Monday, May 13, 2024
More
    Home Blog

    BAFTA TV Awards 2024 Winners Unveiled

    The 2024 BAFTA Television Awards have taken place in London on Sunday evening, bringing much excitement and glamor to the British capital.

    The Crown and Black Mirror led the nominations, unveiled in March, with eight and seven, respectively, followed by Happy ValleySlow Horses, and The Sixth Commandment with six each. Other multiple nominees include the likes of The Last of UsThe Long Shadow, and Succession.

    In the performance categories, 17 of the 44 nominees received their first BAFTA TV Awards nomination, including the likes of David Tennant (Good Omens), Hannah Waddingham (Eurovision Song Contest 2023), Harriet Walters (Succession), Bella Ramsey (The Last of Us), and Elizabeth Debicki (The Crown).

    Sunday’s honors follow the recent BAFTA Television Craft Awards 2024, which were handed out in London in late April. Black MirrorThe Last of Us, and Slow Horses were among the big winners that night.

    This Sunday, the BAFTA TV Awards ceremony, held at London’s Royal Festival Hall, and also airing on BBC One and the BBC iPlayer later in the evening, is being hosted by comedians Rob Beckett and Romesh Ranganathan.

    Among the award presenters unveiled ahead of Sunday’s ceremony were the likes of Jeff Goldblum, Lashana Lynch, Martin Freeman, Aidan Turner, as well as Baby Reindeer duo Richard Gadd and Jessica Gunning.

    Follow along as THR updates the winners, highlighted in bold, of the 2024 BAFTA TV Awards below.

    LEADING ACTRESS

    ANJANA VASAN Demon 79 (Black Mirror) Broke & Bones / Netflix

    ANNE REID The Sixth Commandment – Wild Mercury Productions, True Vision / BBC One

    BELLA RAMSEY The Last of Us – Sony Pictures Television Studios, PlayStation Productions,, Naughty Dog, Word Games, The Mighty Mint, HBO / Sky Atlantic

    HELENA BONHAM CARTER Nolly – Quay Street Productions / ITVX

    SARAH LANCASHIRE Happy Valley – Lookout Point, AMC / BBC One (WINNER)

    SHARON HORGAN Best Interests – AC Chapter One / BBC One

    LEADING ACTOR

    BRIAN COX Succession – Project Zeus, Hyberobject Industries, Gary Sanchez Productions, Hot Seat Productions, HBO / Sky Atlantic

    DOMINIC WEST The Crown – Left Bank Pictures / Netflix

    KANE ROBINSON Top Boy Cowboy Films / Netflix

    PAAPA ESSIEDU The Lazarus Project – Urban Myth Films / Sky Max

    STEVE COOGAN The Reckoning – ITV Studios / BBC One

    TIMOTHY SPALL The Sixth Commandment – Wild Mercury Productions, True Vision / BBC One (WINNER)

    ENTERTAINMENT PERFORMANCE

    ANTHONY McPARTLIN, DECLAN DONNELLY I’m A Celebrity… Get Me Out of Here! – Lifted Entertainment / ITV1

    BIG ZUU Big Zuu’s Big Eats – Boom, Big Productions / Dave

    GRAHAM NORTON The Graham Norton Show – So Television / BBC One

    HANNAH WADDINGHAM Eurovision Song Contest 2023 – BBC Studios / BBC One

    JOE LYCETT Late Night Lycett – Rumpus Media, My Options Were Limited / Channel 4 (WINNER)

    ROB BECKETT, ROMESH RANGANATHAN Rob & Romesh Vs – CPL Productions / Sky Max

    SCRIPTED COMEDY

    BIG BOYS Jack Rooke, Jim Archer, Bertie Peek, Ash Atalla, Alex SmithRoughcut TV / Channel 4

    DREAMING WHILST BLACK Thomas Stogdon, Dhanny Joshi, Adjani Salmon, Ali Hughes, Nicola Gregory, Yemi Oyefuwa – Big Deal Films, A24 / BBC Three

    EXTRAORDINARY Emma Moran, Toby MacDonald, Sally Woodward Gentle, Lee Morris, Charlie Palmer, Jennifer SheridanSid Gentle Film / Disney+

    SUCH BRAVE GIRLS Kat Sadler, Simon Bird, Catherine Gosling Fuller, Jack Bayles, Phil Clarke – Various Artists Limited / BBC Three (WINNER)

    DRAMA SERIES

    THE GOLD Production Team – Tannadice Pictures / BBC One

    HAPPY VALLEY Sally Wainwright, Sarah Lancashire, Jessica Taylor, Faith Penhale, Will Johnston, Fergus O’Brien – Lookout Point, AMC / BBC One

    SLOW HORSES Saul Metzstein, Will Smith, Jane Robertson, Jamie Laurenson, Hakan Kousetta, Iain Canning – See-Saw Films / Apple TV+

    TOP BOY Production Team – Cowboy Films / Netflix (WINNER)

    SINGLE DOCUMENTARY

    DAVID HOLMES: THE BOY WHO LIVED Dan Hartley, Kevin Konak, Simon Chinn, Jonathan Chinn, Vanessa Davies, Amy Stares – Lightbox / Sky Documentaries

    ELLIE SIMMONDS: FINDING MY SECRET FAMILY Jasleen Sethi, David Thompson, Colleen Flynn, Kathryn Jein, Nick Underhill – Flicker Productions / ITV1 (WINNER)

    HATTON Daniel Dewsbury, Paul Yoshida, Sam Bergson, Ian Davies, John McKenna – Noah Media Group, Sky Studios / Sky Crime

    VJERAN TOMIC: THE SPIDER-MAN OF PARIS Jamie Roberts, Dan Reed – Amos Pictures / Netflix

    P&O CRUISES MEMORABLE MOMENT AWARD (voted for by the public)

    BECKHAM David teases Victoria about her ‘working class’ upbringing – Studio99, Ventureland / Netflix

    DOCTOR WHO Ncuti Gatwa being revealed as the 15th Doctor – Bad Wolf, BBC Studios Productions / BBC One

    HAPPY VALLEY Catherine Cawood and Tommy Lee Royce’s final kitchen showdown – Lookout Point, AMC / BBC One (WINNER)

    THE LAST OF US Bill and Frank’s Story – Sony Pictures Television Studios, PlayStation Productions, Naughty Dog, Word Games, The Mighty Mint, HBO / Sky Atlantic

    THE PIANO 13-year old Lucy stuns commuters with jaw dropping piano performance – Love Productions / Channel 4

    SUCCESSION Logan Roy’s death – Project Zeus, Hyberobject Industries, Gary Sanchez Productions, Hot Seat Productions, HBO / Sky Atlantic

    FACTUAL ENTERTAINMENT

    CELEBRITY RACE ACROSS THE WORLD Production Team – Studio Lambert / BBC One (WINNER)

    THE DOG HOUSE Production Team – Five Mile Films / Channel 4

    ENDURANCE: RACE TO THE POLE Alexis Girardet, Mike Warner, Adam Bullmore, Martin Long – October Films / Channel 5

    PORTRAIT ARTIST OF THE YEAR Production Team – Storyvault Films / Sky Arts

    SOAP

    CASUALTY Production Team – BBC Studios / BBC One (WINNER)

    EASTENDERS Production Team – BBC Studios / BBC One

    EMMERDALE Production Team – ITV Studios / ITV1

    DAYTIME

    LOOSE WOMEN AND MEN Production Team – ITV Studios Daytime / ITV1

    LORRAINE Production Team – ITV Studios Daytime / ITV1

    MAKE IT AT MARKET Martin Connery, Aman Mistry, Iain Robson, Kim Merrick, Lauren Elliott, Andrew Snowball – Flabbergast TV / BBC One

    SCAM INTERCEPTORS Production Team – BBC Studios Documentary Unit / BBC One (WINNER)

    INTERNATIONAL

    THE BEAR Christopher Storer, Joanna Calo, Josh Senior, Matty Matheson, Tyson Bidner – FX Productions / Disney+

    BEEF Lee Sung Jin, Steven Yeun    , Ali Wong, Jake Schreier, Ravi Nandan, Alli Reich – A24 / Netflix

    CLASS ACT Bruno Nahon, Tristan Séguela, Olivier Demangel, Laurent Lafittede Passe Entertainment / Netflix (WINNER)

    THE LAST OF US Production Team – Sony Pictures Television Studios, PlayStation Productions, Naughty Dog, Word Games, The Mighty Mint, HBO / Sky Atlantic

    LOVE & DEATH Production Team – Lionsgate, David E. Kelley Productions, Blossom Films, Texas Monthly / ITVX

    SUCCESSION Production Team – Project Zeus, Hyberobject Industries, Gary Sanchez Productions, Hot Seat Productions, HBO / Sky Atlantic

    NEWS COVERAGE

    CHANNEL 4 NEWS: INSIDE GAZA: ISRAEL AND HAMAS AT WAR Esme Wren, Federico Escher, Helene Cacace, Matt Frei, Secunder Kermani, Millicent TeasdaleITN / Channel 4 (WINNER)

    SKY NEWS: INSIDE MYANMAR – THE HIDDEN WAR Production Team – Sky News / Sky News

    SKY NEWS: ISRAEL-HAMAS WAR Production Team – Sky News / Sky News

    CURRENT AFFAIRS

    INSIDE RUSSIA: TRAITORS AND HEROES (STORYVILLE) Paul Mitchell, Anastasia Popova, Mikhail Kozyrev, Daria Olevskaya, Monica Garnsey, Emma Hindley – BBC News World Service, Ronachan Films / BBC Four

    PUTIN vs THE WEST Norma Percy, Tim Stirzaker, Lucy Hetherington, Lotte Murphy-Johnson, Max Stern – Brook Lapping / BBC Two

    RUSSELL BRAND: IN PLAIN SIGHT (DISPATCHES) Production Team – Hardcash Productions / Channel 4

    THE SHAMIMA BEGUM STORY (THIS WORLD)  Joshua Baker, Sara Obeidat, Sasha Joelle Achilli, Sarah Waldron, Simon McMahon, Mustafa Al-Ali – BBC Current Affairs / BBC Two (WINNER)

    LIMITED DRAMA

    BEST INTERESTS Production Team – AC Chapter One / BBC One

    DEMON 79 (BLACK MIRROR) Charlie Brooker, Richard Webb, Jessica Rhoades, Bisha K. Ali, Annabel Jones, Toby Haynes – Broke & Bones / Netflix

    THE LONG SHADOW George Kay, Lewis Arnold, Matt Sandford, Sarah Lewis, Sacha Szwarc, Willow Grylls – New Pictures / ITV1

    THE SIXTH COMMANDMENT Derek Wax, Brian Woods, Sarah Phelps, Saul Dibb, Frances du PilleWild Mercury Productions, True Vision / BBC One (WINNER)

    FEMALE PERFORMANCE IN A COMEDY

    BRIDGET CHRISTIE The Change – Expectation / Channel 4

    GBEMISOLA IKUMELO Black Ops – BBC Studios Comedy Productions, Mondo Deluxe Productions / BBC One (WINNER)

    MÁIRÉAD TYERS Extraordinary – Sid Gentle Films / Disney+

    ROISIN GALLAGHER The Lovers – Drama Republic / Sky Atlantic

    SOFIA OXENHAM Extraordinary – Sid Gentle Films / Disney+

    TAJ ATWAL Hullraisers – Fable Pictures / Channel 4

    MALE PERFORMANCE IN A COMEDY

    ADJANI SALMON Dreaming Whilst Black – Big Deal Films, A24 / BBC Three

    DAVID TENNANT Good Omens – BBC Studios Comedy Productions, Narrativia, The Blank Corporation / Prime Video

    HAMMED ANIMASHAUN Black Ops – BBC Studios Comedy Productions, Mondo Deluxe Productions / BBC One

    JAMIE DEMETRIOU A Whole Lifetime with Jamie Demetriou – BBC Studios Comedy Productions, Guilty Party Pictures / Netflix

    JOSEPH GILGUN Brassic – Calamity Films / Sky Max

    MAWAAN RIZWAN Juice – Various Artists Limited / BBC Three (WINNER)

    SPORTS COVERAGE

    CHELTENHAM FESTIVAL DAY ONE Richard Willoughby, Paul McNamara, Mark Demuth, Bridget Toomey, Rob Oldham, Dionne Robinson-Smith, Andrew Hill – ITV Sport / ITV1 (WINNER)

    MOTD LIVE: FIFA WOMEN’S WORLD CUP 2023 Production Team – IMG / BBC One

    WIMBLEDON 2023 MEN’S FINAL Production Team – BBC Sport, Wimbledon Broadcast Services / BBC One

    LIVE EVENT COVERAGE

    THE CORONATION CONCERT Production Team – BBC Studios / BBC One

    EUROVISION SONG CONTEST 2023 Production Team – BBC Studios / BBC One (WINNER)

    ROYAL BRITISH LEGION FESTIVAL OF REMEMBRANCE Production Team – BBC Studios / BBC One

    REALITY

    BANGED UP Production Team – Shine TV / Channel 4

    MARRIED AT FIRST SIGHT UK Danielle Lux   , Murray Boland, Rachel Viner, Susy Price, James Kayler, Dermot CaulfieldCPL Productions / E4

    MY MUM, YOUR DAD Production Team – Lifted Entertainment / ITV1

    SQUID GAME: THE CHALLENGE Stephen Lambert, Tim Harcourt, John Hay, Nicola Brown, Toni Ireland, Stephen Yemoh – Studio Lambert / Netflix (WINNER)

    FACTUAL SERIES

    DUBLIN NARCOS Benedict Sanderson, Claire McFall, Sacha Baveystock, Edmund Coulthard, Megan Taylor, Laura DunneBlast! Films / Sky Documentaries

    EVACUATION Production Team – Wonderhood Studios / Channel 4

    LOCKERBIE Nancy Strang, John Dower, Claire McFall, Barnaby Fry, Dejan Cancar, Charlie Hawryliw – Mindhouse Productions / Sky Documentaries (WINNER)

    ONCE UPON A TIME IN NORTHERN IRELAND Production Team – KEO Films, Walk On Air Films / BBC Two

    SPECIALIST FACTUAL

    CHIMP EMPIRE James Reed, Matt Houghton, Callum Webster, Matt Cole – KEO Films, Underdog Films / Netflix

    THE ENFIELD POLTERGEIST Jerry Rothwell   , Al Morrow, Stewart le Maréchal, Nicole Stott, Jonathan Silberberg, Davis Guggenheim MetFilm, Concordia Studio / Apple TV+

    FORCED OUT Production Team – Dragonfly / Sky Documentaries

    WHITE NANNY, BLACK CHILD Andy Mundy-Castle, Natasha Dack Ojumu, Rochelle Newman, Zeb Achonu, Ross Leppard, Rachael McLean-Anderson – Doc Hearts, TigerLily Productions, BFI / Channel 5 (WINNER)

    SHORT FORM

    MOBILITY Jack Carroll, Thomas Gregory, Akaash Meeda, David Simpson, Sam Ward – Tiger Aspect Productions / BBC Three (WINNER)

    THE SKEWER: THREE TWISTED YEARS Production Team – unusual / BBC iPlayer

    STEALING UKRAINE’S CHILDREN: INSIDE RUSSIA’S CAMPS Production Team – VICE UK / VICE News

    WHERE IT ENDS Jack Robertson, Fergal Costello, Sam Ward, David Simpson – Tiger Aspect Productions / BBC Three

    COMEDY ENTERTAINMENT

    THE GRAHAM NORTON SHOW Graham Norton, Graham Stuart, Jon Magnusson, Toby Baker, Catherine Strauss, Pete Snell – So Television / BBC One

    LATE NIGHT LYCETT Production Team – Rumpus Media, My Options Were Limited / Channel 4

    ROB & ROMESH VS Danielle Lux, Murray Boland, Jack Shillaker, Bill Righton, David Taylor, Graham Proud – CPL Productions / Sky Max (WINNER)

    WOULD I LIE TO YOU? Peter Holmes, Rachel Ablett, Jake Graham, Zoe Waterman, Liz Clare, Barbara Wiltshire – Zeppotron / BBC One

    ENTERTAINMENT

    HANNAH WADDINGHAM: HOME FOR CHRISTMAS Hannah Waddingham, Hamish Hamilton, Katy Mullen, Moira Ross, Raj Kapoor, Nick Todisco – Done + Dusted / Apple TV+

    LATER… WITH JOOLS HOLLAND Production Team – BBC Studios / BBC Two

    MICHAEL MCINTYRE’S BIG SHOW Christian Fletcher, Dan Baldwin, James Pratt, Lisa Kirk, Sarah Mittell, Simon Staffurth – Hungry McBear / BBC One

    STRICTLY COME DANCING Production Team – BBC Studios / BBC One (WINNER)

    SUPPORTING ACTOR

    AMIT SHAH Happy Valley – Lookout Point, AMC / BBC One

    ÉANNA HARDWICKE The Sixth Commandment – Wild Mercury Productions, True Vision / BBC One

    HARRIS DICKINSON A Murder at the End of the World FX Productions / Disney+

    JACK LOWDEN Slow Horses – See-Saw Films / Apple TV+

    MATTHEW MACFADYEN Succession – Project Zeus, Hyberobject Industries, Gary Sanchez Productions, Hot Seat Productions, HBO / Sky Atlantic (WINNER)

    SALIM DAW The CrownLeft Bank Pictures / Netflix

    SUPPORTING ACTRESS

    ELIZABETH DEBICKI The Crown – Left Bank Pictures / Netflix

    HARRIET WALTER Succession – Project Zeus, Hyberobject Industries, Gary Sanchez Productions and Hot Seat Productions, HBO / Sky Atlantic

    JASMINE JOBSON Top Boy – Cowboy Films / Netflix (WINNER)

    LESLEY MANVILLE The Crown – Left Bank Pictures / Netflix

    NICO PARKER The Last of Us – Sony Pictures Television Studios, PlayStation Productions, Naughty Dog, Word Games, The Mighty Mint, HBO / Sky Atlantic

    SIOBHAN FINNERAN Happy Valley – Lookout Point, AMC / BBC One

    Mike Tyson receives firm warning about his lifestyle ahead of huge Jake Paul fight

    0

    Mike Tyson has been warned about the importance of maintaining a healthy lifestyle ahead of his seismic showdown with Jake Paul later this year.

    It will be the 57-year-old’s first fight in four years, having last fought Roy Jones Jr back in 2020.


    Tyson has given up sex and cannabis as he looks to beat Paul, with the boxing icon also updating fans with clips of him working in the gym.

    Yet former boxing star Vitor Belfort has warned Tyson that, in order to beat Paul, he shouldn’t be maintaining a healthy lifestyle for just a few months.

    Mike Tyson has been warned about his lifestyle and the need to maintain a healthy one as he looks to beat Jake Paul later this year

    GETTY

    He instead thinks Tyson should have been looking after himself for a long period in order to boost his chances of glory.

    Belfort told World Boxing News: “It is good business for both fighters.

    “They generate a lot of money for each other, which is good for the sport.

    “But only Mike can answer that question. I don’t think it would be a good idea if he only trained for this fight.

    “A fighter always has to keep up a healthy lifestyle. I hope that he is.”

    Belfort previously fought Evander Holyfield in an exhibition match back in 2021.

    Addressing comparisons between that showdown and the upcoming fight between Tyson and Paul, he continued: “When I fought Holyfield, he was very strong and very fit, but I was the better man on that night.

    “If he hit me, I could have gone down – that is the nature of the sport.

    “However, I hit him first.

    “This fight feels more like an exhibition, and I don’t think Mike is the same fighter he used to be.”

    Tyson, meanwhile, has also been speaking as the showdown approaches.

    And the 57-year-old has revealed he’s hoping hypnosis can give him an edge as he looks to wind back the years in two months’ time.

    “I’m an exponent of hypnosis,” he recently told Nick Kyrgios.

    “I was raised off of hypnosis since I was 13, 14, to the end of my career. I always had hypnosis before I fought.

    “It only works with, and only certain people get it. Not everybody gets it.

    Mike Tyson

    Mike Tyson has been training hard in the gym as he prepares for his fight with Jake Paul

    INSTAGRAM

    “I guess that’s what life is all about. Not everybody’s the same, but I got it, and it’s all about reaching your self conscious.

    “You have a connection with your self-consciousness and your ferociousness.

    “Everything’s about being connected and using that for your fighting. Everything’s love. Everything is connected to love.

    “Even us that’s going to war. I got hooked back. And it’s war, and there’s love. Everything’s love.”

    While Tyson has given up sex, Paul has revealed he won’t be following suit.

    Jake Paul

    Mike Tyson is coming out of retirement to face off against Jake Paul later this year

    GETTY

    He said on his podcast: “If I didn’t have sex for like… if I restrain myself for like two weeks I start having wet dreams because my body’s like, ‘Get this out!’

    “It’s not weird, it just means that I’m normal.”

    Manchester United 0 Arsenal 1: Title race still alive, Trossard key again, Casemiro blunder

    0

    Arsenal beat Manchester United 1-0 at Old Trafford to return to the top of the Premier League, with just one match remaining for Mikel Arteta’s side this season.

    Leandro Trossard scored the all-important goal from close range following Kai Havertz’s pass. It now means the title race will go to the final day with Manchester City — who are a point behind Arsenal on 85 — playing their game in hand against Tottenham Hotspur on Tuesday.

    United, meanwhile, are in eighth on 54 points, three points behind Chelsea and Newcastle United, with two games remaining.

    Carl Anka, James McNicholas and Liam Tharme break down the key talking points from the game…


    Trossard turns up when it matters… again

    Neither Gabriel Jesus nor Gabriel Martinelli have been as effective in front of goal as expected this season, with just 10 league goals between them. Fortunately, someone else has stepped up: Trossard. He tucked home the opener for his 12th Premier League goal this season — his 17th in all competitions.

    His form has seen him displace Martinelli as first choice on the left wing, and he justified Arteta’s faith at Old Trafford with another critical contribution. Trossard is arguably the most natural finisher in the Arsenal squad and has a habit of delivering big moments even when he appears to be on the periphery of the game.

    Typically, Trossard scoring has been a positive omen for Arsenal. Heading into this game, Arsenal had won their last nine Premier League games when the Belgian scored and were without a defeat in the last dozen games in which he found the net.

    James McNicholas


    It has been a week to forget for Casemiro. The 32-year-old was beaten and bullied by Crystal Palace players in Monday’s 4-0 defeat before he was dropped from the Brazil squad for the 2024 Copa America on Friday.

    The formerly imperious defensive midfielder has been struggling for United all season as injuries, tactical adjustments and other oddities have left him a shadow of his former self.

    This is not the Casemiro that was a controlled frenzy of a man, patrolling Real Madrid’s midfield on his way to winning five Champions League titles. This is not the man who waved away Marcel Sabitzer in February 2023, comfortable in the knowledge few Premier League attackers could beat him.

    This season’s Casemiro has been slow to recognise footballing dangers and naive when reacting to them. Arsenal’s opener in the 20th minute saw Casemiro — who was again moonlighting at centre-back — dawdling by the byline when Andre Onana attempted a short goal kick.

    Arsenal’s aggressive counter-press recovered the ball quickly but Casemiro had barely meandered past the edge of Onana’s penalty area by the time Havertz came into space on the right.

    Instead of sprinting at top pace to join his team-mates and possibly set an offside trap, Casemiro moved without urgency.

    Havertz’s pass found Trossard at the near post and Arsenal found themselves a goal up. The (reasonably) good work United had done up to that point had expired. As Gary Neville said on commentary for Sky Sports: “That is a basic error. You have to get up quicker, and he ambles out. There is no excuse for that.”

    What Erik ten Hag’s side gained from Casemiro’s long passing from deep (he nearly set up Rasmus Hojlund with a pass over the top in the game’s opening 10 minutes), was balanced by everything else.

    Casemiro is not a centre-back — nor would he, or anyone associated with United, have gone into the season expecting him to play there in an injury-enforced emergency. However, at a time when Ten Hag needs big performances from his most experienced players, Casemiro keeps making juvenile mistakes.

    Carl Anka


    Saliba and that tackle

    What’s the biggest difference between Arsenal this time last year and Arsenal now?

    There are a few possible answers: Declan Rice, a growing sense of maturity, going blow for blow with City rather than holding onto a lead. But the biggest of all might be the availability of William Saliba.


    Saliba was imperious for Arsenal (Stuart MacFarlane/Arsenal FC via Getty Images)

    The centre-back’s value to Arsenal was shown during the second half when he executed a sublime tackle on Alejandro Garnacho. With the Argentina international bearing down on him, Saliba backtracked before stepping in with perfect timing. If a tackle can be a thing of beauty, then this was surely it.

    During last season’s run-in, Arsenal lacked composure. Saliba epitomises it. In a game in which Arsenal were some way short of their best, they could still rely on the 23-year-old to keep United at arm’s length.

    James McNicholas


    An Arsenal of options

    “We know the difficulty and the history,” said Arteta pre-match, of a ground where Arsenal had only won four times in 31 Premier League visits.

    An injury-hit United side or not, it was a professional performance compared to how they came unstuck and faded away to Bayern Munich and Porto in the Champions League. Arsenal started the game sitting off, forcing United to try to play through the compact mid-block, then hitting with the sucker-punch goal.

    There were a couple of heroics in Arsenal’s own box — notably Saliba’s tackle (as described above) — but it took more than 67 minutes for United to register a shot on target.

    Arsenal showed their different faces throughout, pinning United back at the start of the second half with possession upfield, counter-pressing aggressively to win it back as quickly as they lost it. There was also some slick build-up using Havertz as a false nine and wingers running inside him, and the other end of the tactical spectrum with wingers defending deep in a back six.

    go-deeper

    GO DEEPER

    Arsenal’s rest defence is the most underrated weapon in the title race

    Never mind only a second Old Trafford Premier League win since 2007, Arsenal made it 42 points, 13 wins, 11 clean sheets and only 13 goals conceded in Premier League away games in 2023-24 — their best season on the road since the 2003-04 Invincibles…

    Liam Tharme


    Any crumbs of comfort for United?

    The last few weeks have seen Ten Hag at pains to express the impact injuries have had on United’s season. The Dutchman had ambitions to turn United into a transition-based side, but a litany of ailments have made him unable to field his best XI for large sections of the season.

    At the start of the game, Ten Hag had gone through 14 different centre-back combinations this season. Arsenal, for comparison, had used three.

    United are a team low in confidence and lacking familiar passing rhythms — as seen in a second half which saw multiple misplaced passes from United players in the final third, with individuals unsure of where to go and what to do in the rare moments they had possession in dangerous areas.

    If there are any crumbs of comfort, they will likely be in United’s midfield balance.

    Sofyan Amrabat was afforded a rare start in central midfield and was tasked with collecting the ball from United’s centre-backs during the build-up. The Moroccan would also sit next to Kobbie Mainoo when the side did not have the ball, creating a simple but not always seen screen ahead of the front four.

    United were not the inconsistent and often incoherent pressers they have been in the past against Arsenal, instead staying in a more-compact-than-usual 4-4-2 shape when their opponents were looking to recycle possession.

    Amad — who had to be substituted in the 70th minute with what looked to be an impact injury — did look dangerous in parts when progressing the ball in attacking areas. It may have been his first Premier League start, but he has made a case to get more game time soon (health permitting.)

    Carl Anka


    What did the managers say?

    We’ll bring you this after both Ten Hag and Arteta have spoken at their post-match press conference.


    What next for Arsenal? (… supporting Spurs?)

    Sunday, May 19: Everton (H), Premier League, 4pm UK, 11am ET

    After Manchester City fans endured watching this game hoping for a United win, Arsenal supporters face the unedifying prospect of having to support Spurs when they host City on Tuesday night. Arsenal know that if they’re to win this title, they need a favour from elsewhere.

    Arteta’s side then face Everton at the Emirates, who they’ve only lost to twice at home in the Premier League era (31 matches), winning 24 and drawing five.

    What next for Manchester United?

    Wednesday, May 15: Newcastle United (H), Premier League, 8pm UK, 3pm ET

    With Newcastle only having a solitary league win at Old Trafford since 1972, history is with Manchester United. Yet, Eddie Howe’s much-depleted Newcastle beat United 3-0 there in the Carabao Cup in November.


    Recommended reading

    (Top photo: David Price/Arsenal FC via Getty Images)

    Was the Stone Age actually the Wood Age?

    0

    In 1836, Christian Jürgensen Thomsen, a Danish antiquarian, brought the first semblance of order to prehistory, suggesting that the early hominids of Europe had gone through three stages of technological development that were reflected in the production of tools. The basic chronology — Stone Age to Bronze Age to Iron Age — now underpins the archaeology of most of the Old World (and cartoons like “The Flintstones” and “The Croods”).

    Thomsen could well have substituted Wood Age for Stone Age, according to Thomas Terberger, an archaeologist and head of research at the Department of Cultural Heritage of Lower Saxony, in Germany.

    “We can probably assume that wooden tools have been around just as long as stone ones, that is, 2½ or 3 million years,” he said. “But since wood deteriorates and rarely survives, preservation bias distorts our view of antiquity.” Primitive stone implements have traditionally characterized the Lower Paleolithic period, which lasted from about 2.7 million years ago to 200,000 years ago. Of the thousands of archaeological sites that can be traced to the era, wood has been recovered from fewer than 10.

    Terberger was team leader of a study published last month in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences that provided the first comprehensive report on the wooden objects excavated from 1994 to 2008 in the peat of an open-pit coal mine near Schöningen, in northern Germany. The rich haul included two dozen complete or fragmented spears (each about as tall as an NBA center) and double-pointed throwing sticks (half the length of a pool cue) but no hominid bones. The objects date from the end of a warm interglacial period 300,000 years ago, about when early Neanderthals were supplanting Homo heidelbergensis, their immediate predecessors in Europe. The projectiles unearthed at the Schöningen site, known as Spear Horizon, are considered the oldest preserved hunting weapons.

    In the mid-1990s, the discovery of three of the spears — along with stone tools and the butchered remains of 10 wild horses — upended prevailing ideas about the intelligence, social interaction and toolmaking skills of our extinct human ancestors. At the time, the scientific consensus was that humans were simple scavengers who lived hand-to-mouth until about 40,000 years ago.

    “It turned out that these pre-Homo sapiens had fashioned tools and weapons to hunt big game,” Terberger said. “Not only did they communicate together to topple prey, but they were sophisticated enough to organize the butchering and roasting.”

    The new study, which began in 2021, examined more than 700 pieces of wood from Spear Horizon, many of which had spent the previous two decades stored in chilled tubs of distilled water to simulate the waterlogged sediment that had protected them from decay. With the aid of 3D microscopy and micro-CT scanners that highlighted signs of wear or cut marks, researchers identified 187 pieces of wood that showed evidence of splitting, scraping or abrasion.

    “Until now, splitting wood was thought to have been only practiced by modern humans,” said Dirk Leder, an archaeologist also at Lower Saxony and lead author of the paper.

    Besides weapons, the assemblage included 35 pointed and rounded artifacts that were most likely used in domestic activities such as punching holes and smoothing hides. All were carved from spruce, pine or larch — “woods that are both hard and flexible,” said Annemieke Milks, an anthropologist from the University of Reading who collaborated on the project.

    Since neither spruce nor pine would have been available at the lakeshore, where the site was located, the research team deduced that the trees had been felled on a mountain 2 or 3 miles away or perhaps even farther. Close inspection of the spears indicated that the Stone Agers planned their woodworking projects carefully, following a set order: strip the bark, remove the branches, sharpen the spear head, harden the wood in fire. “The wooden tools had a higher level of technological complexity than we usually see in stone tools from that age,” Leder said.

    All but one of the spears were hewed from the trunks of slow-growing spruce trees and shaped and balanced like modern javelins, with the center of gravity in the middle of the shaft. But were they meant for throwing, or for thrusting? “The spears were made from dense wood and with thick diameters,” Milks said. “To me, that suggests the hominids manufacturing them may have intentionally designed at least some as flight weapons for hunting.”

    She tested the spears’ external ballistics by enlisting six trained male javelin throwers, aged 18 to 34, to heave replicas at hay bales from various distances. “My point was to ask people who were a little bit better at doing this than archaeologists, because up until that point, we’d had experiments with lots of people who were … archaeologists,” Milks said, adding: “Anthropologists are not very good at that kind of thing, either.”

    From 33 feet away, Team Neanderthals hit the target 25% of the time. The athletes were equally accurate at 50 feet, and only slightly less (17%) at 65 feet. “Still, that was double the range at which scientists had estimated a hand-thrown spear could be useful for hunting,” Milks said.

    For her, the notion that our Stone Age forebears were artisans serves to humanize them. “Working wood is slow, even if you’re good at it,” she said. “There are lots of different steps in the process.” She imagines a bunch of Neanderthals clustered around an evening campfire, assembling and sanding and mending their wooden handicrafts. “It all seems very, very close, in a way,” she said, wistfully, “even though it was such a long, long time ago.”

    ‘A Fatal Inheritance,’ by Lawrence Ingrassia book review

    0

    When Regina Ingrassia died at 42, leaving four children, her death seemed cataclysmic but random. “She was one of 318,500 Americans who died of cancer in 1968,” Lawrence Ingrassia, her second-oldest child, writes. “It was tragic, but what was there to say?”

    There would be much more to say, sadly. “Cancer was far from done with my family,” Ingrassia writes in his new book, “A Fatal Inheritance.” Eventually, he would lose two sisters, a brother and a nephew to malignancies that seemed to strike out of the blue. It would take years for researchers to be able to answer fundamental questions about the killer that stalked his family.

    The political parent trap • Michigan Advance

    0

    Being a working mom requires a lot of juggling. For mothers in the Michigan Legislature, that usually means balancing long commutes, unexpected late-night sessions and weekend meetings with constituents alongside nursing, helping kids with homework, getting them to T-ball practice and much more.

    And so even with more women running for office than ever before, there’s still a big “mom gap” in the Legislature. To put a fine point on it, the Michigan Advance reported this week that in the last 100 years since the first woman was elected to the Legislature, only 27 women legislators have ever been mothers of school-aged children while serving. That’s the same number of male lawmakers who are fathers of school-aged children right now.

    Unfortunately, this isn’t a surprise when moms remain the majority of primary caregivers — something underscored during the pandemic when thousands of parents suddenly were working at home. And yet it was moms in most households who ended up caring for the kids while scrambling to get their work done and make it through Zoom calls without their toddler shrieking or waddling into frame.

    The ‘mom gap’: Few mothers have served in the Michigan Legislature while raising children

    When I first started covering the Michigan Capitol two decades ago, it was a decidedly male-dominated club, with the median age probably somewhere in the 40s (if I’m being generous). After the Great Recession hit and layoffs decimated the press corps, you could count the number of female members on one hand (and I was the only mom for awhile).

    Things have changed a lot these days, with women, mostly in their 20s, dominating our ranks. But there’s still a big mom gap in the media. And I completely understand why.

    Being a reporter isn’t a 9 to 5 job and covering politics can be … a lot. There are plenty of people without kids who leave journalism because they say it’s too hard to achieve a good work-life balance. When you have tiny humans who need you to survive, that frankly becomes impossible at times.

    My journalism career almost ended up being over before it started, after I became pregnant with my first child shortly after getting my first real job at an Iowa newspaper. As I was running around covering state budget cuts and school events, while my husband and I excitedly painted the nursery and stocked up on newborn clothes, I didn’t realize that some editors had decided I must not be that dedicated to my career. (So much for having it all).

    For the next couple of years, I tried to impress them, volunteering for any assignment. But occasionally, I had to take my daughter with when my childcare fell through, like when I was covering former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean campaigning during the 2004 Iowa caucuses. (While he seemed charmed by my baby, he still didn’t really answer my question on his health care plan).

    At the next couple newspapers I worked for, I learned my lesson and didn’t even put photos of my kid on my desk. I can’t definitely say it helped me land better jobs …. but I don’t think it hurt.

    By the time I started covering the Michigan Capitol full-time, I was a single mom with no family in the state. I was writing three or four stories a day, plus taking on freelance work so I could plop something into my daughter’s college fund, so my day never ended when she was done with her after-school program. That meant a lot of late nights and weekends working at home, which my boss didn’t like and my single coworkers resented (even though, if anything, I worked even harder just to prove myself).

    And then there was plenty of mom guilt, as I had to rush to my kid’s winter concert because the Legislature went late or realized I forgot the plates for her school birthday party and tried not to break down in the car.

    Meanwhile, the only female politician I covered who was navigating single parenthood was then-Sen. Gretchen Whitmer, whose kids are the same age as mine. We would occasionally have candid conversations about the struggle after session or committee hearings.

    Editor Susan J. Demas would sometimes have to bring her kids as she covered events, like President Barack Obama at the University of Michigan | Susan J. Demas

    But motherhood is still viewed by too many as a political weakness. One of my former colleagues dismissed Whitmer as a lightweight and told me he knew she’d “never go anywhere in politics when she got pregnant after getting elected” (which sounded very familiar). I haven’t checked back with him since she became the 49th governor of Michigan and landed on everyone’s list of 2028 presidential hopefuls.

    And who could forget when Ingham County Clerk Barb Byrum was grilled a decade ago about possibly running for statewide office when she had a 3- and a 5-year-old. “But don’t the children want Mom at home?” was an actual question she was asked. (You’ll be terribly surprised to hear the reporter was male).

    The satirical site Wonkette summed up the episode with one of the world’s greatest headlines: “Michigan Lady Might Run For Office Even Though She Has Children, What Is Even Up With That?”

    I’d like to think things have changed enough that women today don’t have to endure such blatant sexism, but I think we all know that’s not true. I will say that women are more open now about what to expect when you’re expecting while running for office or chasing after a toddler.

    Being open about the challenges of motherhood helps other women in politics feel less alone. And working toward solutions, like more affordable childcare and better postpartum health care, can help parents all across the state.

    So many powerful women in Michigan and states across the country were willing to share their stories with us at States Newsroom for our Mother’s Day series, “The Mother Load.”

    There are plenty of people without kids who leave journalism because they say it’s too hard to achieve a good work-life balance. When you have tiny humans who need you to survive, that frankly becomes impossible at times.

    “My kids come before work even. That may not be great for everyone to hear,” state Rep. Rachelle Smit (R-Martin) told the Advance. “If my own priorities in my own personal life and as a wife and a mom are not in line, I don’t feel like I can be the best at my job, either.”

    I respect the hell out of that.

    When I bought Inside Michigan Politics back in 2013, I was finally able to primarily work from home and could be there for my kids the way I wanted to be. I was there to get my daughter and new stepson off to school and pick them up afterward. I never had to miss a soccer or football game. By the time I was recruited to start the Michigan Advance over five years ago, my kids were both in high school, but they still (somehow) wanted me around, so having flexibility meant everything.

    Of course, not everyone is this lucky, which is one reason why moms of young kids continue to be a minority in both the Michigan Legislature and Capitol press corps.

    I know we can do better.

    Viking founder Torstein Hagen on the luxury cruise line specifically for baby boomers

    0

    A veteran cruise attendee at just 24 years old, Julia Wilcox is used to her inbox flooding with promotional emails from cruise lines courting loyal customers. But Wilcox, who vlogs her cruise experiences on TikTok, said one cruise line takes a more idiosyncratic approach to their marketing: Two or three times a month, she’ll get thick and glossy paper envelopes in the mail from Viking Cruises, the luxury cruise line which with she took a 10-day trip in January 2023. It’s the only cruise company that sends her paper mail—and it does so persistently.

    “I get so much paper mail from Viking. I’m like, this is insane,” she told Fortune. “You could send me on a free cruise for the amount of paper and things that you send me.”

    While anomalous in its marketing strategy, the logic behind Viking’s insistence on sending snail mail makes more sense after Wilcox, a Gen Z TikToker, admitted she’s not the company’s target audience. In fact, she was four decades younger than the cruise guests’ median age of 60 or 70. That’s just how Viking wants it.

    “They’re the richest group we have around,” Viking CEO Torstein Hagen said in a May 1 CNBC Squawk on the Street interview. “They have the money; they have the time.” 

    Hagen, who at 81 surpasses his baby boomer target audience, has tailored the cruise to the tastes of the older demographic that holds 70% of the country’s disposable income. There are no kids under 18 allowed, and no casinos aboard. Instead, Viking’s line of 92 vessels—traveling to all seven continents and employing a staff of 10,000—offers walking tours of European cities and cheese tastings.

    “It’s a quite serene environment for people up in their ages,” Hagen said, “and for curious people who want to go to destinations, not [who want] to go on waterslides and the like.”

    Hagen’s strategy has certainly worked thus far. Viking, with a $10.4 billion valuation, raised $1.5 billion in its initial public offering on May 1, the highest of any company this year. Per an SEC filing from last month, Viking experienced 14.4% growth from 2015 to 2023, the biggest leap of any luxury river or ocean cruise during that period.

    “We have a very, very clear focus, and that is reflected in all our customer ratings, the rewards we get, and so forth,” Hagen told CNBC. “It doesn’t make us as large as the others, but it certainly makes us more attractive to the consumer.” 

    Viking did not respond to Fortune‘s request for comment.

    The precision and analytical approach Hagen brings to the company reflects his initial pursuit of physics from the Norwegian Institute of Technology before he came to the U.S. and got his MBA at Harvard. Originally from outside of Oslo, the Norwegian developed his business intuition through failure before success. As CEO of cruise line Royal Viking in the 1980s, Hagen arranged for a $240 million management buyout that failed when a competitor made a surprise purchase of the company. He was soon ousted from the role.

    Hagen, who operates the company alongside daughter Karine Hagen, founded Viking in 1997 at 54. He considered it a humble venture composed of  “two guys with two mobile phones and four river ships,” according to the company prospectus. From its maiden voyage, Viking’s goal was, in Hagen’s words, to be a thinking person’s cruise, not a drinking person’s cruise.

    The flow

    Viking has benefited from opportune timing for the cruise industry, namely its recovery from pandemic lockdowns that had wealthy vacationers itching for indulgent respites. Patrick Scholes, managing director of lodging and leisure equity research at Truist Securities, is bullish on the industry’s future because of that high demand.

    “People want a vacation,” he told Fortune. “They’re looking for something different that they hadn’t done for the first two, three years of COVID, which certainly was going on a cruise ship.”

    Cruises developed a reputation during the pandemic, as their closed quarters, conducive to contagious disease, sometimes resulted in boats docking early. Even Viking took a hit after 100 passengers on a June 2023 cruise battled norovirus. Companies sweetened deals to win back customers, offering discounts and promises of private beaches. While restaurants and hotel resorts were slow to recover from the pandemic because of labor shortages, cruise ships’ presence on foreign waters meant not having to abide by U.S. wages and employing ample staff of mostly foreign workers. During Wilcox’s Viking cruise, she marveled at the consistent and frequent turndown and cleaning services.

    “In that value proposition is the high, consistent level of staffing and service on a cruise ship,” Scholes said. “You’ve been to a restaurant, you’ve been to a hotel—staffing is a problem, is a challenge after COVID. And cruise lines have not had that problem.”

    Bob Levinstein, CEO of travel agency CruiseCompete, told Fortune Viking especially lives up to its value promise, mastering food, service, excursions, and communication into a reliable product.

    “They just really have it nailed down,” he said.

    More growth for the company is on the way. Having weathered the pandemic, Viking has 24 ships on order, an option for another dozen, and ambitious plans to expand its Chinese customer base to 150,000 passengers by 2025. Viking’s resilience in a tough time for the industry made the decision to go public a no-brainer for Hagen.

    “The private equity firms, at some stage, have to create liquidity from their investments, and they’ve been in now for eight years—so it was as good a time as any,” Hagen told Fortune last month. “During the pandemic, it was not easy, and I think now coming out of that and having good results, that was the natural thing to do.”

    The ebb

    But tides turn, and the economic waters buoying the cruise business are no exception. As cruise companies accommodate growing demand by commissioning more ships, the promotional packages and companies’ pricing power will ebb, Scholes predicted.

    “This is just economic capitalism,” he said. “Come 2029, we’re going to see a lot of new ships, and that’s going to be a lot of cabins to fill. It’ll be difficult to raise prices.”

    There’s a reason for Viking to stay level-headed through the industry’s maturation, Levinstein argued. The company’s $1.5 billion IPO was well timed, he said, but it likely won’t make waves for Viking’s future. It’s likely just a way for ownership to stay liquid and pad their wallets.

    “That’s only about four of the ocean ships—maybe a little less if prices have gone up since they made their last deal,” he said. “But it’s not game-changing money.”

    The cruise’s humble but established amenities aren’t foolproof, either. “The food definitely was a miss,” Wilcox said of her time aboard a Viking, resulting in the “worst” room service hot dog she’d “ever had.” She heard from other cruisers that the specialty menus the cruise promised to change nightly, but the food items offered have been the same for a decade.

    The slip-up in Viking’s reputation of rock-solid amenities may be a strike against the “cookie-cutter” model Hagen touts as a reason for the cruise line’s success, but the CEO remains clear-eyed on the company’s philosophy of streamlined, steadfast service.

    “In my belief, the moment you try to do everything for everybody, you know what happens?” he said. “You do nothing well.” 

    If Trump is found guilty, then what? He’s bracing voters for the worst

    0

    play

    WASHINGTON – When former president and 2024 candidate Donald Trump claims that the judicial system wants to put him in jail, he’s not just protesting the ongoing hush money trial.

    Trump is also bracing voters for the possibility of a guilty verdict.

    At political rallies, on social media, and to reporters gathered at the courthouse in New York, Trump’s attacks on the trial are designed in part to persuade voters to disregard a bad verdict, according to aides, legal analysts, and a review of his remarks.

    “The New York judicial system has been absolutely abused,” Trump told reporters Friday. “The whole world is watching.”

    Trump is accused of improperly influencing the 2016 presidential election by paying hush money to women, seeking to keep them from publicizing sexual liaisons. He has pleaded not guilty.

    Trump targets moderate voters

    Trump has not explicitly said he expects a guilty verdict, and occasionally expresses public optimism about the outcome of the trial. “Many good things are going on in the case,” the former said Thursday.

    But he has spent much more time claiming political bias by the judge, prosecutors and the jury pool, and argues without evidence that his political opponents will do anything to put him behind bars.

    Trump and supporters have also predicted that a guilty verdict would be reversed on appeal, a step that would not be necessary if he is acquitted or if there is a hung jury.

    Legal experts said Trump has little choice but to brace for a guilty verdict, given how it might affect his campaign against President Joe Biden.

    In claiming the trial is unfair, Trump’s targets include moderate and independent voters who have long been skeptical of his behavior.

    “His base will believe everything he says,” said Bradley P. Moss, a Washington, D.C., lawyer who specializes in government transparency issues. “The question is independents.”

    Trump appeals to New Jersey

    Trump’s latest effort to brace supporters for bad legal news comes Saturday at a campaign rally in Wildwood, N.J.

    This will be Trump’s first campaign rally since a May 1 airport event in Freeland, Mich., where he went on at length about his legal concerns.

    While discussing the ongoing New York trial, Trump said “we haven’t had a decision here, but the decision here can probably only be one thing, I guess … ’cause … this whole thing – it’s a rigged deal; it’s a rigged deal.”

    Trump also equated the hush money trial to the major civil cases he has lost, one over bank loan fraud and two others regarding defamation and sexual abuse of writer E. Jean Carroll.

    Altogether, civil courts have ordered Trump to pay more than $500 million in damages.

    “Hopefully, we’ll win all of that stuff easily on appeal,” Trump said at one point in Michigan.

    ‘Orchestrating Trump’s conviction’

    Trump is also trying to discount the New York verdict by citing legal analysts who agree with his criticisms of the case. Some of them say they believe Trump is bound for a guilty verdict because of the way the trial is being conducted by New York Supreme Court Judge Juan Merchan.

    In a Truth Social post on May 5, Trump cited comments by former federal prosecutor Andrew McCarthy that described “how Judge Merchan is orchestrating Trump’s conviction.”

    Trump also attacks the gag order against him, describing it as an attempt to fix the case. Merchan has found Trump in violation of the gag order ten items over attacks on witnesses and court personnel.

    In reading out criticisms of the case on Friday, Trump said he has to be careful because of the gag order: “If I mention the wrong word, they’ll come out here and they’ll take me out to jail some place, because that’s the way it is with this judge – he wants to show how tough he is.”

    Rerun: Trump previously warned of indictments

    The political world has seen this kind of courtroom drama previously, back before Trump was first indicted.

    In late 2022 and early 2023, Trump braced supporters for the likelihood of indictments, and sought to taint them ahead of time by decrying the investigations as politically motivated.

    In June of 2023, three months after the hush money indictment, Trump told a Republican group in New Hampshire that “there could be others coming,” and described them as “election interference.”

    Trump wound up under indictment in four separate criminal cases.

    In addition to the New York hush money case, the former president faces trial in South Florida on charges of mishandling classified information, and two cases in Washington, D.C., and Georgia on federal and state charges respectively of trying to steal the 2020 election from Biden.

    Trump is seeking to delay the latter three trials to beyond Election Day on Nov. 5. He may succeed, leaving the New York case as his only trial during the election campaign.

    Politically, the indictments may have helped Trump, at least with hardcore Republican voters who fueled his drive toward the 2024 presidential nomination.

    Polls and primaries also reflected skepticism of Trump from moderate and independent voters, some of whom continued to support former South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley even after she dropped out of the race.

    Political impact

    In the meantime, Trump is preparing for an actual verdict in the New York case – and a political impact that is unknowable.

    Jonathan Turley, a law professor at George Washington University who is often cited by Trump, said the former president’s complaints about a “weaponized justice system” are legitimate.

    Even if Trump is convicted, Turley said, he has a good chance to have the case reversed on appeal because “the entire case is becoming a dumpster fire.”

    Turley also said “no one would bet on an acquittal from a New York jury on Trump,” but it’s possible that jurors will deadlock and be unable to render any verdict.

    Trump could legitimately celebrate a hung jury as a victory, he said.

    Whatever the merits of the case, Moss said Trump has been treated fairly by the justice system. For example, Moss said that any other defendant would be in jail now for violating gag orders the way Trump has. “If anything,” he said, “he’s been handled with kid gloves.”

    Moss also said that, while Trump’s base will stick with him no matter what, it’s hard to see how a guilty verdict would help him.

    “I don’t see anything good coming out of this for Trump,” Moss said. “The question is how much damage it does.”

    Contributing: Bart Jansen

    Biden in Seattle: Cease-fire possible ‘tomorrow’ if Hamas frees hostages

    0

    A cease-fire in the Israel-Hamas war could be possible “tomorrow” if the militant group releases hostages, President Joe Biden said Saturday as new evacuation orders were issued in Gaza’s southern city of Rafah.

    “Israel said it’s up to Hamas,” he said at a private fundraiser in Medina, hosted by former Microsoft President Jon Shirley. “If they wanted to do it, we could end tomorrow.”

    It was Biden’s second fundraiser stop in the Seattle area this weekend, as part of a West Coast fundraising swing as he and Vice President Kamala Harris gear up for their reelection bid against presumptive Republican nominee former President Donald Trump. 

    At a reception in downtown Seattle on Friday, Biden boasted about his administration’s record on jobs and climate and slammed Donald Trump as a threat to democracy.

    He made no mention of the war in his Friday speech at Lotte Hotel Seattle, while protesters gathered outside criticized the president for his support of Israel’s war against Hamas.

    Some said it was too little, too late, of Biden’s decision this past week to not provide offensive weapons to Israel for Rafah. His administration on Friday said there was “reasonable” evidence that Israel had breached international law protecting civilians — Washington’s strongest statement yet on the matter.

    Tens of thousands more people were told to evacuate Saturday, as Israel prepared to expand its military operation deeper into what is considered Gaza’s last refuge, according to The Associated Press.

    Biden’s remarks Saturday were limited.

    “I guess I shouldn’t get into all of this,” he said.

    Instead, he continued with a 16-minute speech, repeating his warning of the consequences if Trump wins this fall.

    “Folks, Trump is running for revenge,” Biden said. “I’m running to lead us to the future.”

    Looking ahead, Biden again teased a potential job for Gov. Jay Inslee in his second-term administration, praising the outgoing governor as “the best governor in America on the environment and one of the best overall.

    “I warn you all, if you like seeing him around Washington state, don’t elect me. But if you don’t mind him leaving the state a little bit, elect me because I’m going to try to grab him.”

    In attendance were Sen. Maria Cantwell, U.S. Reps. Kim Schrier, Marilyn Strickland, Suzan DelBene and Adam Smith, Swinomish Indian Tribal Community Chair Steve Edwards and major Democratic donors, including Microsoft President Brad Smith, Amazon general counsel David Zapolsky and former Costco CEO Jim Sinegal.

    Biden had no public events during his Western Washington visit. He departed Seattle-Tacoma International Airport on Air Force One on Saturday afternoon.

    Seattle Times political reporter Jim Brunner contributed to this story, which includes material from The Associated Press.

    2024 WA Election | Local Politics

    Federal judge blocks White House plan to curb credit card late fees

    0

    A federal judge in Texas has blocked a new government rule that would slash credit card late-payment charges, a centerpiece of the Biden administration’s efforts to clamp down on “junk” fees. 

    Judge Mark Pittman of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas on Friday granted an injunction sought by the banking industry and other business interests to freeze the restrictions, which were scheduled to take effect on May 14. 

    In his ruling, Pittman cited a 2022 decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit that found that funding for the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), the federal agency set to enforce the credit card rule, is unconstitutional. 

    The regulations, adopted by the CFPB in March, seek to cap late fees for credit card payments at $8, compared with current late fees of $30 or more. Although a bane for consumers, the fees generate about $9 billion a year for card issuers, according to the agency.

    After the CFPB on March 5 announced the ban on what it called “excessive” credit card late fees, the American Bankers Association (ABA) and U.S. Chamber of Commerce filed a legal challenge. 

    The ABA, an industry trade group, applauded Pittman’s decision.

    “This injunction will spare banks from having to immediately comply with a rule that clearly exceeds the CFPB’s statutory authority and will lead to more late payments, lower credit scores, increased debt, reduced credit access and higher APRs for all consumers — including the vast majority of card holders who pay on time each month,” ABA CEO Rob Nichols said in a statement. 

    Consumer groups blasted the decision, saying it will hurt credit card users across the U.S.

    “In their latest in a stack of lawsuits designed to pad record corporate profits at the expense of everyone else, the U.S. Chamber got its way for now, ensuring families get price-gouged a little longer with credit card late fees as high as $41,” Liz Zelnick of Accountable.US, a nonpartisan advocacy group, said in a statement. “The U.S. Chamber and the big banks they represent have corrupted our judicial system by venue shopping in courtrooms of least resistance, going out of their way to avoid having their lawsuit heard by a fair and neutral federal judge.”


    “Junk fees” cost Americans billions every year

    According to consumer advocates that support the CFPB’s late-fee rule, credit card issuers hit customers with $14 billion in late-payment charges in 2019, accounting for well over half their fee revenue that year. Financial industry critics say such late fees target low- and moderate-income consumers, in particular people of color.

    Despite Pittman’s stay on Friday, analysts said the legal fight over late fees is likely to continue, with the case possibly heading to the Supreme Court. 

    “We believe this opens the door for the CFPB to seek to lift the preliminary injunction if the Supreme Court rules in the coming weeks that Congress properly funded the agency,” Jaret Seiberg of TD Cowen Washington Research Group said in a report following the decision. “It is why we believe this is not the end of the fighting over whether the fee cut will take effect before full consideration of the merits of the lawsuit.”

    —With reporting by CBS News’ Alain Sherter