Advertisement

SKIP ADVERTISEMENT

Comments

Which States Will Gain or Lose Seats in the Next CongressSkip to Comments
The comments section is closed. To submit a letter to the editor for publication, write to letters@nytimes.com.

Which States Will Gain or Lose Seats in the Next Congress

Congressional seats awarded to each state from the 2020 census

Each box represents a House seat.

Gaining seats

Losing seats

No change

N.H.

Maine

Vt.

Mont. +1

Wash.

Mass.

N.D.

Mich. –1

N.Y.

–1

Conn.

Idaho

Wyo.

S.D.

Ore.

+1

Minn.

Wis.

R.I.

Neb.

Penn. –1

Colo.

+1

Ohio

–1

Iowa

N.J.

Nev.

Utah

Ill.

–1

Ind.

Md.

Kan.

N.M.

W.Va. –1

Calif.

–1

Va.

Ariz.

Ky.

Del.

Mo.

Okla.

Tenn.

N.C. +1

Ga.

Ark.

S.C.

Texas

+2

Miss.

Ala.

La.

Fla.

+1

Alaska

Hawaii

Maine

N.H.

Vt.

Mont. +1

Mich.

–1

Mass.

Wash.

N.D.

Minn.

N.Y.

–1

Conn.

Ore. +1

Idaho

Wyo.

S.D.

Wis.

R.I.

Neb.

Penn. –1

Colo.

+1

Ohio

–1

Iowa

N.J.

Nev.

Utah

Ill.

–1

Ind.

Md.

Kan.

N.M.

Calif.

–1

Va.

Ariz.

Ky.

Mo.

Del.

W.Va.

–1

Okla.

Tenn.

N.C. +1

Ga.

Ark.

S.C.

Texas

+2

Miss.

Ala.

La.

Fla.

+1

Alaska

Hawaii

N.H.

Maine

Vt.

Mont. +1

Wash.

Mass.

N.D.

Conn.

N.Y.

–1

Mich.

–1

Idaho

Wyo.

S.D.

Minn.

Ore.

+1

Wis.

R.I.

Neb.

Penn. –1

Colo.

+1

Iowa

N.J.

Ohio

–1

Nev.

Utah

Ind.

Ill.

–1

Md.

Kan.

N.M.

W.Va. –1

Va.

Ky.

Ariz.

Calif.

–1

Del.

Mo.

Okla.

Tenn.

N.C. +1

Ga.

Ark.

S.C.

Texas

+2

Miss.

Ala.

La.

Fla.

+1

Alaska

Hawaii

Sources: United States Census Bureau; socialexplorer.com

The new census numbers are in, and they show an America continuing its long population shift from the Northeast and Midwest to the South and West, a trend that will shape Congress for the next decade.

The country’s old center of political power — the industrial belt stretching from New York to Illinois — is once again losing seats in Congress while Sun Belt states such as Florida, North Carolina and Texas will gain them. California will lose a seat for the first time.

Congressional seats in each region

150 congressional seats

South

West

100

Midwest

Northeast

50

0

1910

’40

’60

’80

2000

’20

South

150 congressional seats

West

100

Midwest

Northeast

50

0

1910

1940

1960

1980

2000

2020

Several of the states gaining or losing seats are key swing states, and the changes to the political map will help determine which party holds majorities in the House through the 2020s, beginning with next year’s midterm elections.

Most of the congressional district lines will be drawn in the upcoming months by state legislatures and local commissions that have been given redistricting authority. Republicans control the redistricting process in far more states than do Democrats, because of G.O.P. dominance in down-ballot elections.

Democrats, meanwhile, have shifted redistricting decisions in states where they have controlled the government — such as California, Colorado and Virginia — to independent commissions intended to create fair maps.

Congressional apportionment is determined by essentially dividing the U.S. population by 435, the number of seats in the House. The fastest-growing states will add new seats, while those that are shrinking or growing slower than the national average will lose them.

State population growth above and below the U.S. rate, by decade since 1900

State population grew

faster than the country

+40 pct. pts.

+20

U.S. rate

0

1900

2020

–20

State population grew

slower than the country

Alaska
Maine
Wis.
Vt.
N.H.
Wash.
Idaho
Mont.
N.D.
Minn.
Ill.
Mich.
N.Y.
Mass.
Ore.
Nev.
Wyo.
S.D.
Iowa
Ind.
Ohio
Pa.
N.J.
Conn.
R.I.
Calif.
Utah
Colo.
Neb.
Mo.
Ky.
W.Va.
Va.
Md.
Del.
Ariz.
N.M.
Kan.
Ark.
Tenn.
N.C.
S.C.
Okla.
La.
Miss.
Ala.
Ga.
Hawaii
Texas
Fla.
Sources: United States Census Bureau; socialexplorer.com

Republicans will need to flip only about five House seats in the 2022 election to seize control of the chamber.

The results released on Monday show that seven states will lose seats while six will gain. Texas will add two seats and Florida one. The fast-growing states of Montana and Oregon will each add one seat, as will Colorado and North Carolina. Montana’s second seat comes after 30 years of having just a single at-large district.

At the same time, the big states of the Midwest and Northeast that historically have backed Democrats will lose congressional seats and the electoral votes that come with them. Illinois, Michigan, Ohio, New York, Pennsylvania and West Virginia will each lose one district. California’s loss of one seat reflects the slowing population growth of the nation’s largest state.

If the 2020 election was re-run with the new Electoral College numbers, President Biden would have won 303 electoral votes, instead of the 306 he took last November. Mr. Biden won the Electoral College with plenty of votes to spare.

The census was hampered or delayed by an array of Trump administration efforts to remove undocumented immigrants from the count, a shift that mostly likely would have increased the number of Republican-held districts in the next Congress.

Who wins?

The fastest-growing states are the obvious winners. Texas has added multiple seats in each census since 1970, and Florida has added seats after each census since 1890.

Florida’s congressional seats over time

Gained seats from the previous census

’80

2000

’90

1910

’60

’30

’40

’50

’70

’20

’10

4

seats

5

6

8

12

15

19

23

25

27

28

1910

’30

’40

’70

’80

’90

2000

’10

’20

’50

8

15

23

25

27

28

4

seats

5

6

19

1910

’30

’40

’50

’70

’80

4

seats

5

6

8

15

19

1990

2000

’10

’20

25

27

28

23

No state has been gaining more people than Texas. In the last decade, Texas has effectively increased its size by the population of Connecticut — primarily because of the swarms of Americans and new immigrants moving en masse to its booming metropolitan areas surrounding Austin, Dallas and Houston.

Texas’ congressional seats over time

Gained seats

No change

’30

’50

’60

’70

2000

’10

’20

1910

’40

’80

’90

21

22

23

25

27

30

32

36

38

18

seats

21

1910

’30

’70

’80

’90

2000

’20

’40

’50

’60

’10

25

27

30

32

36

38

18

seats

21

21

22

23

1910

’30

’40

’50

’60

’70

18

seats

21

21

22

23

25

’80

’90

2000

’10

’20

27

30

38

32

36

Having more members of Congress means more political power for the growing states of the South and West. And having more electoral votes will highlight the priorities of these states in presidential contests — especially battlegrounds like Florida and Texas — and draw greater attention from the candidates.

Before the 1910 census, the number of congressional seats increased as the population grew. Since 1910, the number of House seats has been capped at 435. Gaining more seats means grabbing more political power from other states.

In the last five reapportionments, Texas has added 11 congressional districts, reaching 38 beginning with the 2022 election from 27 in 1990. Just 10 other states have more members of Congress than Texas has added in that period alone.

Who loses?

That certain states are losing seats is predictable, based on historical performance. New York has now lost congressional seats for eight reapportionments in a row. Pennsylvania has lost seats after every census since 1920. Ohio and Michigan have both lost seats five times in a row. West Virginia has lost two-thirds of its congressional districts since it had six heading into the 1960 census.

But losing a seat is a new experience for California, which doubled in population between the start of World War II and the turn of the millennium.

California’s congressional seats over time

Gained seats

Lost seats

No change

1910

’30

’40

’50

’60

’70

’80

’90

2000

’10

’20

38

52

53

11

seats

20

23

30

43

45

53

52

’30

’50

’60

’90

’10

’20

’10

’40

’70

’80

2000

11

seats

20

23

30

38

43

45

52

53

53

52

’10

’30

’40

’50

’60

’70

38

43

11

seats

20

23

30

’80

’90

2000

’20

’10

45

52

53

53

52

From 1860 to 2000, California gained congressional seats after every census. It kept the same number of seats, 53, after the 2010 census. Now the Golden State will lose one, yet another indication that its political influence may have plateaued.

Never has the New York House delegation carried less weight than it will after the 2022 election. After losing one seat, New York will have 26, down from a high of 45 in the 1930s and 1940s. The state’s loss was narrow — if it had counted just 89 more people, Minnesota would have lost a seat instead of New York.

New York’s congressional seats over time

Gained seats

Lost seats

No change

1910

1930

1940

1960

1980

1990

2000

2010

2020

1950

1970

45

41

34

31

29

27

26

43 seats

45

43

39

1910

1930

1940

1950

1960

1970

39

43 seats

45

45

43

41

1980

1990

2000

2010

2020

34

31

29

27

26

1910

1930

1940

45

45

43

1970

1950

1960

41

43

39

1980

1990

2000

34

31

29

2010

2020

27

26

New York has not had so few members of Congress since the 1800 census, when the House had only 142 members — less than one-third its current size.

Like New York, Pennsylvania is long past its high point of influence on Congress.

Pennsylvania’s congressional seats over time

Gained seats

Lost seats

1910

1930

1940

1950

1960

1970

1980

1990

2000

2010

2020

33

30

25

21

18

36 seats

34

27

23

19

17

1910

’30

’40

’50

’60

’70

’80

’90

2000

’10

’20

34

30

27

23

19

36 seats

33

25

21

18

17

1910

1950

1940

1930

36 seats

30

33

34

1990

1980

1960

1970

21

23

27

25

2000

2010

2020

19

18

17

The 2020 census is the 10th in a row in which Pennsylvania has lost congressional seats.

Will more power shift to Republicans?

Republicans control the mapmaking process in key states like Florida, North Carolina and Texas, where there are new House seats to be created amid booming suburban populations. The G.O.P. is also likely to eliminate a Democratic district in Ohio, which will lose one seat.

At the same time, Democratic lawmakers in Illinois and New York are poised to eliminate Republican seats as they draw new maps.

Who controls redistricting

Democrats

Republicans

Split

Independent commission

States gaining seats

States losing seats

Mont.

Ore.

N.Y.

Mich.

Penn.

Ohio

Ill.

Colo.

W.Va.

Calif.

N.C.

Texas

Fla.

States gaining seats

Mont.

Ore.

Colo.

N.C.

Texas

Fla.

States losing seats

N.Y.

Mich.

Penn.

Ohio

Ill.

W.Va.

Calif.

And several key states with changes coming to their maps — California, Colorado, Michigan and Montana — have independent commissions tasked with determining new legislative boundaries on a nonpartisan or bipartisan basis.

“The parties have this natural inclination to go for broke, say, ‘We’ve got a new seat, let’s grab it and take the opportunity we have,’ ” said Bernard Grofman, a political science professor at the University of California, Irvine, who has served as a special master for court-ordered redistricting in multiple states. For Republicans, he said, “picking up new seats and stopping Joe Biden is going to have a high, high priority, even though they may pay a big political price down the road.”

The 2021 redistricting process will also be the first time since 1961 that a raft of mostly Southern states will not have their maps subject to a preclearance process from the Justice Department, following the Supreme Court’s 2013 decision to strike down Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act. The court last month heard arguments that could undo more elements of the act that would impede the ability to sue to block new maps.

Without having to seek preclearance, Republicans in states where they control all levers of government — Florida, Georgia and Texas, to name three — will have far more influence on the new maps than they have had in past reapportionment cycles.

A handful of states with split control of the government — including Minnesota, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin — will have a battle between Republican legislators and Democratic governors. In North Carolina, Republicans who control the legislature will draw the maps, which by state law cannot be vetoed by Gov. Roy Cooper, a Democrat.

In Texas, it’s likely its new districts will need to include at least parts of greater Houston, given the region’s population boom. Republican mapmakers will be hard-pressed to draw all the new districts in their favor, given how many Democratic voters live in and around the state’s largest population centers.

All districts within a state are supposed to have roughly the same population. The map below shows which districts have grown more or less than that number since redistricting after the 2010 census release.

How population in districts changed, relative to the average

Here’s a look at whether the populations in current district boundaries have grown more or less than the average of about 761,000 people.

More than average

Less than average

10,000

25,000

50,000

75,000

100,000 people

10,000

25,000

50,000

75,000

100,000 people

Because Montana gained a seat, its single district will be split into two. Each one will represent more than 500,000 fewer people than the current district.

Portland

Missoula

Billings

Detroit

Chicago

New York

San Francisco

Denver

Charleston

Raleigh

Los Angeles

Atlanta

Dallas

Austin

Orlando

Houston

The districts near Houston will most likely to be split up because the current boundaries are overpopulated.

Miami

More than average

Less than average

10,000

50,000

100,000 people

10,000

50,000

100,000 people

Because Montana gained a seat, its single district will be split into two. Each one will represent more than 500,000 fewer people than the current district.

Portland

Missoula

Billings

Detroit

Chicago

New York

San Francisco

Denver

Charleston

Los Angeles

Raleigh

Atlanta

Dallas

Austin

Orlando

Houston

Miami

The districts near Houston will most likely to be split up because the current boundaries are overpopulated.

More than average

Less than average

10,000

50,000

10,000

50,000

100,000

people

100,000

people

Because Montana gained a seat, its single district will be split into two. Each one will represent more than 500,000 fewer people than the current district.

Portland

Billings

New York

Chicago

Denver

Charleston

Raleigh

Atlanta

Dallas

Houston

Miami

The districts near Houston will most likely to be split up because the current boundaries are overpopulated.

Notes: Data are estimates based on the changes in population between the 2019 American Community Survey and the 2020 Census. Each district is assumed to have changed the same amount as the rest of the state for that period. Alaska, New Hampshire, North Dakota, South Dakota and Wyoming each have only one statewide district and will not redistrict.·Sources: Census Bureau; socialexplorer.com

The new Texas map presents the biggest question for partisan mapmakers: Whether to maximize their advantage heading into the 2022 midterm elections or draw fewer, more durable districts for Republicans.

Take a look at the full census data released Monday.

Changes in population and congressional seats, 2010-20

State
2020 Census population
Percentage change
New seats
Seats change
Average
district size
California
39,538,223
+6.13
52
–1
760,350
Texas
29,145,505
+15.91
38
+2
766,987
Florida
21,538,187
+14.56
28
+1
769,221
New York
20,201,249
+4.25
26
–1
776,971
Pennsylvania
13,002,700
+2.36
17
–1
764,865
Illinois
12,812,508
–0.14
17
–1
753,677
Ohio
11,799,448
+2.28
15
–1
786,630
Georgia
10,711,908
+10.57
14
765,136
North Carolina
10,439,388
+9.48
14
+1
745,671

Expand