Respond to prefers-color-scheme dark in app web views

Follow section front redirects in Spectrum

Enable NLP source in PCS for load testing

Switch off the News Alerts Survey Widget when we have enough responses

Poll to determine if new LUF updates are available

Allows the winning A/B test variant to be turned on without Spectrum deployment

Show infinite scrolling sections in Assembler MultiView

Show option for NLP article summaries in Action Bar

Show NLP summaries collection recirc on article pages

A general feature flag for Recipe Features that aren't yet released

Feature flag for media team features that aren't yet released

Use new Orca video player for preroll plugin in Spectrum

Show the snow tracker (instead of the heat tracker) on Spectrum

A college professor wants to use Section 230 against Big Tech

Commerce Department revokes more export licenses to China’s Huawei

Apple plays up AI potential in new iPads

Nats go over .500 the hard way by beating the O’s and Corbin Burnes

A look at what has changed since the Nationals were last above .500

Baseball can crush rookies. Why hasn’t it crushed Trey Lipscomb?

‘Look at the U.S.A.’: A photographer’s reflection on post-9/11 conflict

How Trump’s allies amplify his Truth Social messages to the wider world

In photos: The scene after tornadoes struck Michigan and Oklahoma 

In Arizona, election workers trained with deepfakes to prepare for 2024

Election 2024 latest news: Biden back in the battleground state of Wisconsin

France tries to shed its rude reputation ahead of the Olympics

Don’t be a jerk at the airport: A guide for headphones

The new cure-all for vacation excess: the IV drip 

Ask Amy: I want to be closer with my brother. He never reaches out to me.

Miss Manners: I’m offended by a golfer’s skirt choice

Carolyn Hax: Family pushes siblings to ‘make amends’ after their mother’s death

Middle East conflict live updates: WHO says health services in south Gaza will run out of fuel in three days

U.S. signals optimism for Gaza cease-fire as Israel moves into Rafah 

The FTC’s noncompete clause rule goes too far

The next global crisis could come from the sun. We should prepare now.

The crisis Biden and Trump don’t want to deal with

RFK Jr’s ‘history lesson’ on Russia’s invasion of Ukraine flunks the fact test

In court, Stormy Daniels pulled a Trump on Trump 

Postal worker finds WWII-era letters, drives 5 hours to deliver them

Strangers help Sesame Street puppeteer after heirloom necklace was stolen

Teen grabs wheel when driver passes out and school bus veers into traffic

The Trump-Biden battle over the 2017 tax cut

That time football legend, rig-driving eligible bachelor Biden was arrested

Social Security has to be fixed. But you still need your own savings.

An I bond is now at 4.28 percent. Are they still a good deal?

Use these 6 points to say no to a college you and your kid can’t afford

US-VOTE-POLITICS-ECONOMY-BIDEN

Big Tech news and how to take control of your data and devices

See more coverage in your recommendations

Technology

Tips delivered to your inbox twice weekly

The Tech Friend newsletter

Business and Tech alerts

Elon Musk has offered to proceed with a deal to buy Twitter at the price he proposed months ago before trying to call it off, according to a legal filing, a stunning development weeks before the two sides were due to face off in a trial.

In a letter that Musk’s side sent to Twitter overnight, he offered to go ahead with the deal at $54.20 a share if the Delaware Chancery Court, which was scheduled to hold the trial on Oct. 17, agrees to “enter an immediate stay” of the case “and adjourn the trial and all other” related proceedings. Twitter enclosed a copy of the letter from Musk’s attorneys in a financial filing Tuesday.

Twitter said in a statement Tuesday that it received the letter and intends to close the transaction at the original share price offered by Musk’s team. The company plans to accept the offer but is waiting for confirmation that the judge can oversee the process, said a person familiar with the discussions who spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe sensitive matters.

Because there is great distrust on both sides, Twitter leaders are still questioning whether the letter represents a legal maneuver, the person said.

Elon Musk’s texts reveal what led to Twitter bid, before deal fell apart

Musk’s offer comes at a key moment in the lead-up to <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/07/12/twitter-elon-musk-lawsuit/" target=_blank>the trial</a>, which was due to settle months of legal wrangling between the billionaire and the social media company following Musk’s<a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/07/08/musk-deal-sec/" target=_blank> moves in July to terminate</a> his planned $44 billion purchase of Twitter.

Both sides had been conducting depositions. Musk’s side collected testimony from Twitter chief executive Parag Agrawal and whistleblower Peiter Zatko, the company’s former head of security, who <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/interactive/2022/twitter-whistleblower-sec-spam/?itid=co_twitter-whistleblower_1&itid=mc_magnet-twitter-whistleblower_inline_1" target=_blank>alleged extreme deficiencies</a> in Twitter’s security practices and inaccuracies in its filings to security regulators, according to court schedules.

Two people briefed on Zatko’s sworn interviews said they did not produce any revelations that would have helped Musk’s effort to escape the deal without incurring significant costs. Zatko was also deposed by Twitter.

Musk was scheduled to be deposed in the case Thursday in Austin, where he lives, after the original date was scrapped, the filings showed. His attorney Alex Spiro’s deposition was expected to follow on Sunday in New York.

Musk and his attorney did not respond to requests for comment Tuesday. The tech mogul weighed in on Twitter on Tuesday afternoon, however.

“Buying Twitter is an accelerant to creating X, the everything app,” he wrote. That letter is also used in his holding entities for the Twitter purchase, X Holdings.

Legal experts say Musk’s willingness to close the deal suggests that he may have realized that he was in a weaker position than he wanted to be going into the trial and his deposition.

“Musk is finally listening to his lawyers,” Anat Alon-Beck, a business law professor at Case Western Reserve University, said in an email. “He would be a fool to not at least try to buy the company now and avoid being deposed.”

Bloomberg News first reported news of the offer. Twitter shares were suspended Tuesday at their highest level in months after the report.

“This is a clear sign that Musk recognized heading into Delaware Court that the chances of winning versus Twitter board was highly unlikely,” Dan Ives, an analyst with Wedbush Securities, wrote in a note Tuesday. “This $44 billion deal was going to be completed one way or another.”

The court held an emergency hearing Tuesday morning with both sides. Musk was willing to drop the case, but Twitter wanted assurances that the court would oversee the process because of the distrust, the person familiar with the discussions said.

For months, Musk has argued that he should be entitled to exit the deal because of representations Twitter had made regarding spam and bots on the platform, but legal experts said Musk had waived due diligence by proceeding with the deal.

Twitter has been thrust<a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/05/18/twitter-musk-takeover-chaos/" target=_blank> into internal chaos</a> this year as it has faced a tumultuous stock decline and an increasingly uncertain future with Musk. Many senior executives and rank-and-file workers have left the company or have been fired.

Elon Musk attempts hostile takeover of Twitter, calling path ‘painful’

The billionaire chief executive of Tesla took a large stake in Twitter earlier this year and <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/04/14/elon-musk-twitter-takeover-bid/" target=_blank>launched a hostile takeover bid</a> in April. The company was at first hesitant to accept his offer but eventually acquiesced.

While Musk’s interest in owning Twitter initially seemed surprising, one motivation for his purchase was made clearer in <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/09/30/elon-musk-texts-twitter/" target=_blank>text messages</a> revealed in court documents last week: He was increasingly frustrated with what he saw as the encroachment on free speech by content moderation decisions. Musk <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/04/14/elon-musk-ted-talk/" target=_blank>said</a> in a TED interview in April that he wanted an “inclusive arena for free speech.”

He also said he would <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/05/10/musk-talk-twitter/">reverse the ban</a> on former president Donald Trump, saying at an event in May that it “was a morally bad decision, to be clear, and foolish in the extreme.” Twitter permanently banned Trump after the <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/january-6-capitol-riot/" target="_blank" class="contextual_link">Jan. 6</a>, 2021, <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/interactive/2021/jan-6-insurrection-capitol/" target=_blank>insurrection</a>.

The text messages also show that Twitter co-founder and former chief executive Jack Dorsey was one of Musk’s biggest supporters in the process and was often at odds with the board, which was often scrambling to understand Musk and his motives. The texts reveal an elite cast of characters, including celebrities, high-profile investors and media barons, who gave Musk input on the deal, made hiring suggestions and sometimes encouraged him to let right-wing figures who were banned by Twitter back on the platform.

But the outspoken executive, who has more than 107 million followers on Twitter, moved to back out of the deal months later, arguing that he had a right to drop out of the agreement because Twitter hadn’t given him enough information about the company’s business.

Twitter and Musk have been locked in litigation ever since.

Musk soured on the deal amid economic pressures, as the impact of his offer caused a blow to Tesla’s stock — the key source of his wealth — and his net worth. He had planned to finance the deal through a combination of loans and a $33 billion equity commitment tied to his own wealth, which would draw on investors.

Musk sold nearly $7 billion worth of Tesla stock in anticipation of having to close the deal in early August, after the battle was already going to court, surprising some investors.

“In the (hopefully unlikely) event that Twitter forces this deal to close *and* some equity partners don’t come through, it is important to avoid an emergency sale of Tesla stock,” he wrote on Twitter.

The renewed offer was not immediately announced inside Twitter, several employees said, speaking on the condition of anonymity, leaving employees to learn about it the same way their users did: on Twitter.

But in an email to Twitter employees Tuesday afternoon, obtained by The Washington Post, Twitter General Counsel Sean Edgett informed them of Musk’s offer, adding, “Our intention is to close the transaction at $54.20 per share,” echoing the language of Twitter’s public statement.

Employees began to sound off on the platform Tuesday, expressing shock after months of deliberations. Some conveyed skepticism that the letter was sincere. One employee summed up the mood by saying “Congrats or I’m sorry y’all” in an internal Slack message described to The Post.

The prospect of Musk buying Twitter had already opened rifts among the company’s ranks, as his critical tweets about the company and plans to reverse key policies, <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/05/10/musk-talk-twitter/">including its ban</a> on Trump, <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/04/25/twitter-employees-musk/">rankled many employees</a>. Meanwhile, the company’s value slid amid economic woes and a decline in the social media advertising market, and in July Musk filed to <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/07/08/musk-deal-sec/">back out of the deal</a>, setting the stage for the court battle.

At least one employee, speaking on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss their job, said Tuesday that they can’t imagine staying at the company if Musk becomes owner.

The possible resolution comes alongside a major downturn for internet stocks, prompting layoffs and hiring freezes at industry heavyweights. The possibility that Musk might yet end up acquiring Twitter at the original price has helped the company’s shares hold much of their value during a year when social media rivals Meta and Snap have shed more than half of theirs.

Will Oremus and Joseph Menn contributed to this report.

University of Nebraska-Lincoln

Faiz Siddiqui is a technology reporter with The Washington Post's Business Desk covering companies such as Tesla and Twitter. His area of coverage has also included ride-hailing and the race to build autonomous cars. Prior to that, he covered the D.C. Metro and local transportation scene.

Faiz Siddiqui

Winner of the 2017 Overseas Press Club Bob Considine Award for "Behind the Firewall" Series on Silicon Valley China

 2010 Finalist, Livingston Award for Young Journalists

 2009 Finalist, Livingston Award for Young Journalists 

Columbia University, BA. 

Columbia Graduate School of Journalism, MS.

Lizza joined The Washington Post as Silicon Valley correspondent in 2016, becoming the paper's eyes and ears in the region. She focuses on social media and the power of the tech industry in a democratic society. Before that, she was the Wall Street Journal's first full-time beat reporter covering AI and the impact of algorithms on people's lives. 

Elizabeth Dwoskin

Western Washington University, BA in Journalism

Rachel Lerman covers breaking news in technology for The Washington Post.

Rachel Lerman

washpost