Thursday, May 16, 2024
More
    Home Blog

    Sen. Bob Menendez ‘put his power up for sale,’ prosecutor claims in bribery trial

    0

    Sen. Robert Menendez “put his power up for sale” and “betrayed the people he was supposed to serve,” a prosecutor claimed Wednesday at the start of the New Jersey Democrat’s federal bribery trial in New York.

    The defense meanwhile introduced Menendez “not as an agent of the Egyptian government” but as “an American patriot” who “took no bribes.”

    Menendez has pleaded not guilty to 16 federal charges including bribery, fraud, acting as a foreign agent and obstruction.

    Federal prosecutors in New York have alleged that he accepted hundreds of thousands of dollars in bribes in the form of cash, gold bars, mortgage payments and a luxury convertible in exchange for the senator’s political clout. Three New Jersey businessmen who were also charged, along with the governments of Egypt and Qatar, were the alleged recipients.

    “He was powerful. He was also corrupt,” prosecutor Lara Pomerantz said of the senator during her opening statement. “In the United States of America, leaders are expected to put their country first, to put the interests of the people they serve above their own. This case is about a public official who put greed first.”

    Pomerantz pointed at Menendez, who was seated at the defense table with his head turned toward the jurors.

    “This is Robert Menendez, a United States senator from New Jersey, and he was entrusted to make big decisions, including decisions that affect this country’s national security,” Pomerantz said. “Robert Menendez was a United States senator on the take, motivated by greed, focused on how much money he could put in his own pocket and in his wife’s pocket. That is why you’re here today. That is what this trial is all about.”

    His price, Pomerantz told the jury, was gold bars, envelopes stuffed with cash, checks to his wife for a no-show job and a Mercedes-Benz convertible.

    “This was not politics as usual. This was politics for profit,” Pomerantz said. “The FBI found gold bars and over $400,000 in cash in Menendez’s home, in a safe, in jacket pockets, in shoes, all over the house.”

    Pomerantz outlined the alleged corruption schemes that she said “filled Menendez’s pockets,” starting with a promise to assist the government of Egypt with military aid.

    “Menendez promised to use his power to help Egypt. And that deal, bribes for Menendez’s promise to help Egypt, lasted for years,” Pomerantz said.

    According to the indictment, the arrangement was brokered by New Jersey businessman Wael Hana, a friend of Menendez’s wife, Nadine, who prosecutors said received the senator’s help preserving a halal meat monopoly.

    “Robert Menendez was willing to corruptly use his power to help Hana and the government of Egypt in exchange for bribes. What the law calls quid pro quo,” Pomerantz said. “Sham paychecks and gold from Hana for Menendez’s promise of military aid for Egypt.”

    Menendez is also charged with receiving a $60,000 Mercedes-Benz convertible in exchange for help disrupting a case by the New Jersey Attorney General’s Office.

    “Why did Menendez agree to disrupt a criminal investigation? Because Nadine needed a car,” Pomerantz said. “Menendez would try to make the investigation go away.”

    In the spring of 2019, another New Jersey businessman, Jose Uribe, handed Nadine $15,000 in cash that prosecutors said she used as a down payment for the car. She texted Menendez, “Congratulations. We are the proud owners of a 2019 Mercedes,” according to Pomerantz. Uribe, who has pleaded guilty and agreed to cooperate, kept making the monthly payments, prosecutors said.

    Not long after Menendez allegedly agreed to use his power to intervene in a state criminal case, Pomerantz said the senator promised a third businessman, Fred Daibes, that he would interfere with Daibes’ federal prosecution and help the government of Qatar by supporting a Senate resolution praising the country.

    “What did Menendez get in exchange? Cash and gold bars,” Pomerantz said.

    She told the jury that Daibes’ fingerprints were found on the envelopes of cash found at Menendez’s home and serial numbers on the gold bars traced them to Daibes and Hana.

    At the time, the gold bars were worth $50,000 apiece, prosecutors said.

    “Did Menendez know how much they were worth? You bet,” Pomerantz said. “Menendez Googled the price of a kilogram of gold.”

    In his opening statement, defense attorney Avi Weitzman insisted “there are innocent explanations for the gold and the cash” found in the senator’s New Jersey home — hinting at a strategy to blame Menendez’s wife, who was also charged in the case.

    “The gold bars were found in a closet that is a locked closet. It is Nadine’s closet,” Weitzman said. “He did not know of the gold bars that existed in that closet.”

    Weitzman said the couple led “separate lives” and the senator’s wife had financial concerns that she kept from her husband.

    “The evidence will show that Nadine was hiding her financial challenges from Bob,” he said.

    Menendez’s wife has pleaded not guilty to her charges and will be tried separately in July due to a medical condition.

    The defense said “the government has been investigating this case for years” and came up with “not one piece” of evidence that shows the senator took a bribe.

    “He did not violate the law, period, and the allegations by the United States Attorney’s Office are wrong, dead wrong,” Weitzman said. “He did not ask for bribes. He did not get any bribes.”

    Menendez has said all of the actions in the indictment fell within the scope of his position.

    “Bob was doing his job and he was doing it right,” Weitzman said.

    Weitzman went on to compare Menendez to the bespectacled character in the “Where’s Waldo” children’s books with the blue pants, red and white striped shirt and cap always lost in a crowd.

    Weitzman displayed on a screen the signature crowded landscape from the books with cartoonish words “Where’s Bob?” and invited the jury to think of it during the trial.

    “Every time the government shows you something about Nadine, just ask yourself, ‘Where’s Bob?'” Weitzman said.

    Weitzman insisted the two led separate lives.

    “He didn’t know about the dealings Nadine had,” Weitzman said of Menendez. “You can’t just assume that Bob knows about them.”

    Weitzman showed the jury a photo of Menendez’s closet, dress shirts neatly hanging, and said no cash was found there. He said much of the cash was found in the basement of Nadine’s home and was withdrawn over 30 years.

    “I know that sounds odd,” Weitzman said. “From a young age, the senator learned the value of having cash,” which the lawyer said was the product of his upbringing by parents who fled Cuba. “These were not bills that were given as bribes.”

    The seated jury, which was selected and sworn in earlier Wednesday, includes a retired economist, an occupational therapist who likes “hanging out with my dog,” an attorney originally from Michigan and someone who “had a nephew locked up for molestation.” All pledged to be fair.

    “I’m going to ask, to the extent you feel comfortable, to minimize your news intake,” Judge Sidney Stein told prospective jurors at one point.

    Before opening statements, the judge precluded testimony from a psychiatrist the defense hoped would bolster Menendez’s claim that he stashed cash in his home as a result of a “fear of scarcity.” Menendez, the son of Cuban immigrants, has said it was part of his upbringing to keep cash lying around, but Stein said the psychiatrist’s testimony “just doesn’t stand up.”

    Menendez is the first sitting member of Congress to be charged with conspiracy by a public official to act as a foreign agent.

    The senator has maintained his innocence since his initial indictment last year.

    In March, he announced that will not seek another term as a Democrat but he left open the possibility of running in November as an independent.

    GameStop stock slides 18% as meme rally fades

    0

    GameStop stock (GME) tanked more than 18% Wednesday as a rally among meme names showed signs of fading. Shares of the video game retailer are coming off a two-day short squeeze. GameStop stock gained more than 180% over the prior two sessions amid numerous halts for volatility.

    AMC (AMC) also fell 20% Wednesday after shares of the theater chain operator had climbed 95% in the past two days.

    Other heavily shorted stocks that dropped Wednesday included SunPower (SPWR), Beyond Meat (BYND), and the Children’s Place (PLCE).

    GameStop shares surged Monday after the reemergence of Keith Gill, also known as “Roaring Kitty,” whose bull case on GameStop ignited the meme stock rally back in 2021.

    In a note to clients, Nicholas Colas, co-founder at DataTrek Research, wrote this recent trading action “feels like an echo of early 2021, when this account helped fuel a vicious short squeeze in GameStop.”

    Colas noted that the move back in 2021 was quite a bit larger than we’ve seen so far this time around, with GameStop stock rising 1,500% in January 2021 before forfeiting most of those gains.

    The pain short sellers endured during the original meme stock rally three years ago didn’t deter bets against these companies in recent days.

    Keith Gill, known in social media forums as Roaring Kitty, testifies during a virtual hearing on GameStop in Washington, on Feb. 18, 2021. (House Financial Services Committee via AP, File) (ASSOCIATED PRESS)

    Short interest in GameStop remained elevated since that meme rally, data from S3 Partners showed, with almost 24% of the float.

    GameStop shorts were down $1.36 billion on Tuesday after losing almost $900 million on Monday.

    “We are seeing continued squeeze related short covering due to the rebirth of the meme trade,” said Ihor Dusaniwsky, managing director of S3 Partners.

    On Tuesday, Wall Street strategists warned the fresh burst of enthusiasm is far from the madness of three years ago, with “low” chances of a 2021 repeat.

    GameStop stock tumbled on Wednesday, indicating the rally in meme names is fading. (AP Photo/John Minchillo, File)

    GameStop stock tumbled on Wednesday, indicating the rally in meme names is fading. (AP Photo/John Minchillo, File) (ASSOCIATED PRESS)

    The meme frenzy three years ago garnered national attention, attracting an army of retail traders during the pandemic lockdowns.

    “I don’t look at this at all like I did in 2021 when it was almost a transformational moment, dragging, you know, tens of millions of people back into the marketplace,” said Tom Sosnoff, CEO of tastylive, an options and futures trading platform.

    On Tuesday, YouTuber Matt Kohrs, who has held positions in GameStop and AMC in the past, said the pivotal aspect of “the little guy versus the big guy” during the short squeezes of 2021 holds true today.

    “The perception is that the entire system is set up and insulated to benefit the powerful elite. GME is the symbol of the populist movement against that concept,” said Kohrs.

    “The only true change I see from a psychology standpoint is not being locked inside anymore,” he added.

    Ines Ferre is a senior business reporter for Yahoo Finance. Follow her on Twitter at @ines_ferre.

    Click here for the latest stock market news and in-depth analysis, including events that move stocks

    Read the latest financial and business news from Yahoo Finance

    Slovakian Prime Minister Robert Fico shot and is fighting for his life

    0

    BANSKA BYSTRICA, Slovakia (AP) — Slovakia’s populist prime minister, Robert Fico, was shot multiple times and gravely wounded Wednesday while greeting supporters at a event in an attempted assassination that shocked the small country and reverberated across Europe weeks before an election.

    Doctors were still fighting for his life several hours after the pro-Russian leader, 59, was hit in the abdomen, Defense Minister Robert Kalina told reporters at the hospital where Fico was being treated for his wounds.

    He said an operation on Fico was not yet complete and described his condition as “extraordinarily serious.”

    Five shots were fired outside a cultural center in the town of Handlova, nearly 140 kilometers (85 miles) northeast of the capital, government officials said. Fico was shot while attending a meeting of his government in the town of 16,000 that was once a center of coal mining.

    A suspect was in custody, and an initial investigation found “a clear political motivation” behind the assassination attempt, Interior Minister Matus Sutaj Estok said as he briefed reporters alongside the defense minister.

    “There’s no doubt about it,” Kalinak added.

    Fico has long been a divisive figure in Slovakia and beyond, but his return to power last year on a pro-Russian, anti-American message led to even greater worries among fellow European Union members that he would lead his country further from the Western mainstream.

    His government halted arms deliveries to Ukraine, and critics worry that he will lead Slovakia — a nation of 5.4 million that belongs to NATO — to abandon its pro-Western course and follow in the footsteps of Hungary under populist Prime Minister Viktor Orbán.

    Thousands have repeatedly rallied in the capital and across Slovakia to protest Fico’s policies.

    A message posted to Fico’s Facebook account said he was taken to a hospital in Banská Bystrica, 29 kilometers (17 miles) from Handlova, because it would take too long to get to the capital, Bratislava.

    The attack comes as political campaigning heats up three weeks ahead of Europe-wide elections to choose lawmakers for the European Parliament. Concern is mounting that populist and nationalists similar to Fico could make gains in the 27-member bloc.

    “A physical attack on the prime minister is, first of all, an attack on a person, but it is also an attack on democracy,” outgoing President Zuzana Caputova, a political rival of Fico, said in a televised statement. “Any violence is unacceptable. The hateful rhetoric we’ve been witnessing in society leads to hateful actions. Please, let’s stop it.”

    President-elect Peter Pellegrini, an ally of Fico, called the shooting “an unprecedented threat to Slovak democracy. If we express other political opinions with pistols in squares, and not in polling stations, we are jeopardizing everything that we have built together over 31 years of Slovak sovereignty.”

    The recent elections that brought Fico and allies to power have underlined deep social divisions.

    Gábor Czímer, a political journalist at Slovakian news outlet Ujszo.com, said the results showed that “Slovak society was strongly split into two camps” — one that was friendly toward Russia and another that pushed for stronger connections with the European Union and the West.

    “At the same time, I couldn’t imagine that it would lead to physical violence,” Czímer said.

    U.S. President Joe Biden said he was alarmed. “We condemn this horrific act of violence,” he said in a statement.

    NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg posted on the social media platform X that he was “shocked and appalled” by the attempt on Fico’s life, while European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen called it a “vile attack.”

    Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy denounced the violence against a neighboring country’s head of government.

    “Every effort should be made to ensure that violence does not become the norm in any country, form or sphere,” he said.

    Fico, who is in his fourth term, and his leftist Smer, or Direction, party won Slovakia’s Sept. 30 parliamentary elections.

    But politics as usual were put aside as the nation faced the shock of the attempt on Fico’s life.

    Slovakia’s Parliament was adjourned until further notice. The major opposition parties, Progressive Slovakia and Freedom and Solidarity, canceled a planned protest against a controversial government plan to overhaul public broadcasting that they say would give the government full control of public radio and television.

    Progressive Slovakia leader Michal Simecka called on all politicians “to refrain from any expressions and steps which could contribute to further increasing the tension,” Simecka said.

    Czech Prime Minister Petr Fiala wished the premier a swift recovery. “We cannot tolerate violence, there’s no place for it in society.”

    The Czech Republic and Slovakia formed Czechoslovakia until 1992.

    ___

    Janicek reported from Prague.

    ___

    This version corrects that Fico is serving his fourth term as prime minister, not his third.

    The top AI announcements from Google I/O

    0

    Google’s going all in on AI — and it wants you to know it. During the company’s keynote at its I/O developer conference on Tuesday, Google mentioned “AI” more than 120 times. That’s a lot!

    But not all of Google’s AI announcements were significant per se. Some were incremental. Others were rehashed. So to help sort the wheat from the chaff, we rounded up the top new AI products and features unveiled at Google I/O 2024. 

    Google plans to use generative AI to organize entire Google Search results pages.

    What will AI-organized pages look like? Well, it depends on the search query. But they might show AI-generated summaries of reviews, discussions from social media sites like Reddit and AI-generated lists of suggestions, Google said.

    For now, Google plans to show AI-enhanced results pages when it detects a user is looking for inspiration — for example, when they’re trip planning. Soon, it’ll also show these results when users search for dining options and recipes, with results for movies, books, hotels, e-commerce and more to come.

    Project Astra and Gemini Live

    Image Credits: Google / Google

    Google is improving its AI-powered chatbot Gemini so that it can better understand the world around it.

    The company previewed a new experience in Gemini called Gemini Live, which lets users have “in-depth” voice chats with Gemini on their smartphones. Users can interrupt Gemini while the chatbot’s speaking to ask clarifying questions, and it’ll adapt to their speech patterns in real time. And Gemini can see and respond to users’ surroundings, either via photos or video captured by their smartphones’ cameras.

    Gemini Live — which won’t launch until later this year — can answer questions about things within view (or recently within view) of a smartphone’s camera, like which neighborhood a user might be in or the name of a part on a broken bicycle. The technical innovations driving Live stem in part from Project Astra, a new initiative within DeepMind to create AI-powered apps and “agents” for real-time, multimodal understanding.

    Google Veo

    Veo
    Image Credits: Google

    Google’s gunning for OpenAI’s Sora with Veo, an AI model that can create 1080p video clips around a minute long when given a text prompt. 

    Veo can capture different visual and cinematic styles, including shots of landscapes and time lapses, and make edits and adjustments to already generated footage. The model understands camera movements and VFX reasonably well from prompts (think descriptors like “pan,” “zoom” and “explosion”). And Veo has somewhat of a grasp on physics — things like fluid dynamics and gravity — which contribute to the realism of the videos it generates. 

    Veo also supports masked editing for changes to specific areas of a video and can generate videos from a still image, à la generative models like Stability AI’s Stable Video. Perhaps most intriguing, given a sequence of prompts that together tell a story, Veo can generate longer videos — videos beyond a minute in length.

    Ask Photos

    Image Credits: TechCrunch

    Google Photos is getting an AI infusion with the launch of an experimental feature called Ask Photos, powered by Google’s Gemini family of generative AI models.

    Ask Photos, which will roll out later this summer, will allow users to search across their Google Photos collection using natural language queries that leverage Gemini’s understanding of their photo’s content — and other metadata.

    For instance, instead of searching for a specific thing in a photo, such as “One World Trade,” users will be able to perform much more broad and complex searches, like finding the “best photo from each of the National Parks I visited.” In that example, Gemini would use signals such as lighting, blurriness and lack of background distortion to determine what makes a photo the “best” in a given set and combine that with an understanding of the geolocation info and dates to return the relevant images.

    Gemini in Gmail

    Image Credits: TechCrunch

    Gmail users will soon be able to search, summarize and draft emails, courtesy of Gemini — as well as take action on emails for more complex tasks, like helping process returns. 

    In one demo at I/O, Google showed how a parent could catch up on what was going on at their child’s school by asking Gemini to summarize all the recent emails from the school. In addition to the body of the emails, Gemini will also analyze attachments, such as PDFs, and spit out a summary with key points and action items.

    From a sidebar in Gmail, users can ask Gemini to help them organize receipts from their emails and even put them in a Google Drive folder, or extract information from the receipts and paste it into a spreadsheet. If that’s something you do often — for example, as a business traveler tracking expenses — Gemini can also offer to automate the workflow for use in the future.

    Detecting scams during calls

    Image Credits: Google

    Google previewed an AI-powered feature to alert users to potential scams during a call. 

    The capability, which will be built into a future version of Android, uses Gemini Nano, the smallest version of Google’s generative AI offering, which can be run entirely on-device, to listen for “conversation patterns commonly associated with scams” in real time. 

    No specific release date has been set for the feature. Like many of these things, Google is previewing how much Gemini Nano will be able to do down the road. We do know, however, that the feature will be opt-in — which is a good thing. While the use of Nano means the system won’t be automatically uploading audio to the cloud, the system is still effectively listening to users’ conversations — a potential privacy risk.

    AI for accessibility

    Image Credits: Google

    Google is enhancing its TalkBack accessibility feature for Android with a bit of generative AI magic.

    Soon, TalkBack will tap Gemini Nano to create aural descriptions of objects for low-vision and blind users. For example, TalkBack might describe an article of clothing as such: “A close-up of a black and white gingham dress. The dress is short, with a collar and long sleeves. It is tied at the waist with a big bow.”

    According to Google, TalkBack users encounter around 90 or so unlabeled images per day. Using Nano, the system will be able to offer insight into content — potentially forgoing the need for someone to input that information manually.

    We’re launching an AI newsletter! Sign up here to start receiving it in your inboxes on June 5.

    Read more about Google I/O 2024 on TechCrunch

    Gavin Newsom reacts to Meghan, Harry’s ‘delinquent’ charity

    California Governor Gavin Newsom weighed in on the controversy surrounding Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s Archewell Foundation.

    The charity run by the couple was declared “delinquent” and ordered to stop raising or spending money in a letter from California’s Attorney General Rob Bonta on May 3.

    But Archewell and the attorney general’s office have confirmed that the organization is now “fully compliant and in good standing.”

    Meghan Markle and Prince Harry started the Archewell Foundation in 2020. The Archewell Foundation

    Newsom, 56, defended the Sussexes and their foundation during a press conference at a behavioral health treatment center in San Mateo County on Tuesday.

    “I’m here at a behavioral health site, a mental health site. Archewell Foundation, run by Meghan Markle and Prince Harry, do extraordinary work, particularly [for] women and girls, but notably around mental health,” the governor said.

    Gavin Newsom defended the Archewell Foundation at a press conference Tuesday. AP

    He continued: “And I just want folks to know, not only are they in compliance, it was a technical paperwork issue that was wildly overhyped, and with respect, I hope people that ran those headlines run this headline, that it was a very typical, technical issue around paperwork that persists for so many others as well.” 

    “And they’re in full compliance and they’re a celebrated organization that does great work in the state of California,” Newsom added. “So I wanted to clarify that, because that’s important, and I just thought there was a little bit of a piling on that was deeply unfair.”

    Gavin Newsom is the governor of California. AP

    The letter that sparked the initial controversy claimed that Harry, 39, and Markle, 42, let the registration fees for Archewell lapse, causing their organization to be listed as delinquent in the registry of charities and fund-raisers.

    “An organization that is listed as delinquent is not in good standing and is prohibited from engaging in conduct for which registration is required, including soliciting or disbursing charitable funds,” the document, filed by the state’s attorney general, read.

    The document also said, “The organization may also be subject to penalties and its registration may be suspended or revoked by the Registry.”

    Meghan Markle and Prince Harry were in Nigeria when the controversy over their charity made headlines. Getty Images for The Archewell Foundation
    Markle and Harry visited Nigeria for three days. Getty Images for The Archewell Foundation

    Archewell includes the couple’s nonprofit charitable foundation as well as their for-profit business divisions focusing on media production, Archewell Audio and Archewell Productions.

    A spokesperson for Archewell confirmed to Page Six Tuesday that the foundation was back in business.

    “We have diligently investigated the situation and can confirm that the Archewell Foundation remains fully compliant and in good standing,” the statement read.

    Meghan Markle and Prince Harry at an event for their Archewell Foundation in New York in October Stephen Yang for NY Post

    The spokesperson added: “Due payments were made promptly and in accordance with the IRS’s processes and procedures. Furthermore, all necessary paperwork had been filed by the foundation without error or wrongdoing.”

    According to Page Six, the foundation owed around $200, not including any late fees.

    Markle and Harry set up their Archewell charity after they quit royal life and moved to California in March 2020.

    They were in Nigeria this week when the controversy over their foundation made headlines.

    Harry and Markle during their trip to Nigeria Getty Images for The Archewell Foundation

    “We’re just doing great. And happy to be watching our family grow up and evolve,” Markle told People magazine during their three-day Nigeria tour.

    “Of course I’m happy,” the mom of two added. “We’re really happy.”

    Men are 4 times more likely to lose weight when offered money: study

    0

    People with obesity are four times more likely to lose weight if they’re offered pounds at the end of their weight loss journey, according to a new study from the UK. 

    Professor Pat Hoddinott from the University of Stirling in Scotland led the year-long study, published in the journal JAMA Network. The study, called Game of Stones, included 585 men from Bristol, England, Belfast, Ireland, and Glasgow, Scotland who had an average body mass index of 37.7. The study found that in addition to offering financial incentives, sending motivational text messages with information about lifestyle changes and online resources helped people lose more weight.

    The study participants were divided into three groups. One group got cash incentives and motivational text messages, another group got just motivational text messages and a third group got neither. 


    Some men in the study were texted about lifestyle changes. Creativa Images – stock.adobe.com

    People who were offered money and got text messages lost an average of 4.8% of their body weight, people who were sent just texts lost 2.7%, and people who got neither lost just 1.3%.

    “Losing weight can make people feel better, reduce their risk of many health problems such as diabetes, and helps the health service with their aim to keep men well. However, we know men often don’t like to go to traditional weight loss groups,” Hoddinott said in a JAMA press release. 


    Professor Pat Hoddinott led the study.
    Professor Pat Hoddinott led the study. stir.ac.uk

    “This was a very carefully planned study, created for men by men. We worked closely with various men’s health groups and charities, including Men’s Health Forum in the UK and Ireland, with more than 1000 men living with obesity informing the design of the incentive structure,” Hoddintot added.

    One group of participants was told that $507 was being held in an account for them which they would receive after the study but should they not meet their weight loss goals, money would be taken out. Of those in that group, 27 of them received the full amount. On average, those men got $162.

    “The research showed that offering cash incentives was a popular and effective way of helping men to lose weight. This initiative would be a low-cost solution for the health service to offer to men, requiring only four short weight appointments, and with money paid out only at the end to those who lose over 5% of their starting weight,” Hoddintot said in the release. 

    2024 NFL schedule release: Live updates ahead of tonight’s full announcement

    0

    Week 1: Green Bay Packers vs. Philadelphia Eagles, Sept. 6, in São Paulo, Brazil, Peacock

    The league’s first game in Brazil features two playoff teams. It’ll also be the NFL’s first Friday opener for teams since 1970.

    “We’re looking forward to being a part of this historic matchup against the Eagles in São Paulo,” said Packers president and CEO Mark Murphy via the team website. “We’re excited to play in front of our devoted fans in Brazil and help build upon the international popularity of the NFL and the Packers. We had a great experience playing internationally for the first time a couple of years ago, and we’re proud to be part of the league’s continued global growth.”

    The Packers have played outside of the United States several times, though most have been preseason games. They’ve played two preseason games in Canada (1997 in Toronto, 2019 in Winnipeg), and one in Tokyo in 1998. They’ve played only one regular-season game on foreign soil: the 2022 contest against the New York Giants in London, which they lost 27-22.

    There will be four other international games during the 2024 NFL season, though we only know the home teams for those contests. The Carolina Panthers will be the home team for a game played in Munich. The Minnesota Vikings and Chicago Bears will both be home teams for games in London, as will the Jacksonville Jaguars, who will be playing their 12th London game since 2013.

    Did dinosaur blood run hot or cold? Both, according to a new study

    0

    Sign up for CNN’s Wonder Theory science newsletter. Explore the universe with news on fascinating discoveries, scientific advancements and more.



    CNN
     — 

    Were dinosaurs warm-blooded like birds and mammals or cold-blooded like reptiles? It’s one of paleontology’s oldest questions, and gleaning the answer matters because it illuminates how the prehistoric creatures may have lived and behaved.

    Challenging the prevailing idea that they were all slow, lumbering lizards that basked in the sun to regulate their body temperature, research over the past three decades has revealed that some dinosaurs were likely birdlike, with feathers and perhaps the ability to generate their own body heat.

    However, it’s hard to find evidence that unquestionably shows what dinosaur metabolisms were like. Clues from dinosaur eggshells and bones have suggested that some dinosaurs were warm-blooded and others were not.

    A new study published in the journal Current Biology on Wednesday suggested that three main dinosaur groups adapted differently to changes in temperature, with the ability to regulate body temperature evolving in the early Jurassic Period about 180 million years ago.

    Based on fossils from 1,000 dinosaur species and paleoclimate information, the new study looked at the spread of dinosaurs across different environments on Earth throughout the dinosaur era, which started some 235 million years ago and ended 66 million years ago when an asteroid slammed into Earth.

    Two of the three main groups — meat-eating therapod dinosaurs, which included T. rex, and plant-eating ornithischians, whose notable members included Triceratops and Stegosaurus — spread to live in colder climates during the early Jurassic Period, the research suggested. These dinosaurs may have evolved endothermy, or the ability to internally generate body heat, according to the study.

    Sarah Meyssonnier/Reuters

    Visitors look at the skeleton of a gigantic Triceratops over 66 million years old, named “Big John,” on display before its sale at Drouot auction house in Paris in October 2021.

    Therapods and ornithischians lived in a broad range of thermal landscapes in their respective evolutionary histories and were “remarkably adaptable,” the researchers wrote. Recent fossil discoveries have shown that different species of dinosaurs even thrived in the Arctic, giving birth and living there year-round.

    “Warm-blooded animals are generally more active, for example, cold-blooded animals usually don’t build nests,” said lead study author Dr. Alfio Alessandro Chiarenza, Royal Society Newton International Fellow at University College London’s department of Earth sciences.

    By contrast, the towering, plant-eating sauropods kept to warmer, lower-latitude regions of the planet, and the availability of richer foliage in certain habitats wasn’t the only factor why, the study found. Sauropods, which included Brontosaurus and Diplodocus, also appeared to thrive in arid, savannahlike environments and practiced “prolonged climatic conservatism,” the researchers wrote.

    “It reconciles well with what we imagine about their ecology,” Chiarenza said. “They were the biggest terrestrial animals that ever lived. They probably would have overheated if they were hot-blooded.”

    What’s more, he added, the amount of plant matter they would have needed to consume if they were warm-blooded would have been unsustainable.

    “(These animals) were living in herds and we know that each one of them was the equivalent of 10 African elephants. (If they were warm-blooded) they would just destroy plant life. It makes more sense, as living animals, for them to be more cold-blooded.”

    However, Jasmina Wiemann, a postdoctoral research scientist at the Field Museum of Natural History in Chicago, said that the findings from this study contrasted with her own research, which looked at molecular traces of oxygen intake found in dinosaur fossils. Her 2022 study suggested that ornithischians were more likely cold-blooded and sauropods were warm-blooded.

    She questioned to what extent the biogeographic range of a dinosaur was determined by its metabolic capacity as opposed to other factors such as behavior, growth strategy, dietary preferences and other ecological interactions.

    “Some animals with incredibly fast growth rates (i.e., sauropods), and by requirement, fast metabolisms, are here found to be cold-blooded, while other animals with very slow growth rates (i.e., ceratopsians) are recovered as endotherms,” Wiemann said. “These discrepancies will need to be addressed.”

    Chiarenza said that the model, developed by researchers at UCL and Universidade de Vigo in Spain, suggested that the earliest dinosaurs were more reptilian and cold-blooded. But a period of global warming resulting from volcanic activity 180 million years ago, known as the Jenkyns Event, may have been a trigger for the evolution of the ability to generate body heat internally.

    “At this time, many new dinosaur groups emerged. The adoption of endothermy, perhaps a result of this environmental crisis, may have enabled theropods and ornithischians to thrive in colder environments, allowing them to be highly active and sustain activity over longer periods, to develop and grow faster and produce more offspring,” he said in a news release.

    As with all research based on models, the study made predictions grounded in existing information. New fossils or climatic information might alter that picture. “Of course, if a sauropod turned up in the Arctic that would change things,” Chiarenza said.

    Paleontologist Anthony Fiorillo, executive director of the New Mexico Museum of Natural History & Science, said the study was “intriguing” and the “first real attempt to quantify broad patterns that some of us had thought about previously.” Fiorillo, who is also a senior fellow at Southern Methodist University in Dallas, wasn’t involved with the research.

    “Their modeling helps create a robustness to our biogeographical understanding of dinosaurs, and their related physiology,” he said.

    “This study provides a platform for us to further test what we think we might know.”

    Overdose Deaths Dropped in U.S. in 2023 for First Time in Five Years

    0

    Overdose deaths in the United States declined slightly last year, the first decrease in five years, according to preliminary federal data released Wednesday.

    The rare good news in the decades-old addiction crisis was attributable mostly to a drop in deaths from synthetic opioids, chiefly fentanyl, said researchers at the National Center for Health Statistics, who compiled the numbers.

    But the full portrait of the death toll from street drugs remains grim. Even as opioid deaths fell, deaths from stimulants such as cocaine and methamphetamine rose. And some states, including Oregon and Washington, continued to experience sharp rises in overall overdose fatalities.

    Drug overdoses overall in 2023 were estimated at 107,543, down from 111,029 in 2022, a 3 percent drop. Opioid deaths fell 3.7 percent while deaths from cocaine rose 5 percent and deaths from meth rose 2 percent.

    The report from the health statistics agency, an arm of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, did not offer reasons for the drop. But naloxone, a drug that reverses opioid overdoses, has become more widely available: In 2023, 22 million doses of Narcan, the best-known brand, were distributed in the United States and Canada. Test strips for users to detect the presence of fentanyl in a drug became more popular, and many communities and clinics offered programs that hand out sterile syringes.

    Dr. Brian Hurley, president of the American Society of Addiction Medicine, a professional organization of more than 7,500 treatment providers, said that the group appreciated what he called “the leveling of the overdose curve.”

    But he noted that the total remained “historically high” and that the gap between “those with addiction and those receiving treatment remains unacceptably wide.”

    He continued, “Universal access to addiction medications, when clinically appropriate, should be our minimum standard.”

    But though medications exist to curb opioid cravings and reverse opioid overdoses, there are no approved overdose reversal treatments for stimulants, and few options for treating addiction to such substances.

    The latest estimates represent the first drop-off in drug fatalities since 2018, before rates began worsening drastically. By 2020, during the isolation and uncertainty of the Covid pandemic, overdose deaths, in large measure due to fentanyl, hit 100,000 a year and kept climbing. By 2022, they were still increasing, though the rate had slowed.

    “Now in 2023, we’re finally seeing a decrease, not just flattening out,” said Farida Ahmad, a health scientist with the National Center for Health Statistics.

    The new numbers arrive at a tense moment in a policy debate over how to balance law enforcement and treatment in addressing the drug crisis. In one of the boldest moves, Oregon voted in 2020 to decriminalize possession of street drugs to focus on treatment. But in the face of the rising overdose death rates and street crimes, the state recently repealed the measure.

    Local, state and federal governments have been trying to toggle between tackling the supply of drugs as well as demand. A study published this week in the International Journal of Drug Policy reported that in 2023, local law enforcement seized more than 115 million pills containing fentanyl last year, more than double the 49 million seized in 2017.

    The federal Drug Enforcement Administration said it additionally seized nearly 80 million counterfeit pills that contained traces of fentanyl, up from 50.6 million pills in 2022.

    At the same time, the Biden administration and many local governments have been proponents of a public health approach known as “harm reduction,” which has a primary goal of lowering drug death rates by making drug use safer.

    A separate report with a state-by-state breakdown of a 12-month period ending in November 2023 showed that a majority are projected to have low, single-digit percentage declines in overdose deaths. Nebraska, Kansas and Indiana all saw fatalities dropping more than 14 percent over 2022 figures.

    In contrast, 16 states are projected to have small rises in overdose deaths, and in Alaska, Washington, Nevada and Oregon, they spiked by at least 27 percent.

    The 2023 national numbers are not expected to be finalized for several months.

    First Trump-Biden Debate Could Come as Early as June

    0

    President Biden is willing to debate former President Donald J. Trump at least twice before the election, and as early as June — but his campaign is rejecting the nonpartisan organization that has managed presidential debates since 1988, according to a letter obtained by The New York Times.

    The letter by the Biden campaign lays out for the first time the president’s terms for giving Mr. Trump what he has openly clamored for: a televised confrontation with a successor Mr. Trump has portrayed, and hopes to reveal, as too feeble to hold the job. In a Truth Social post on Wednesday morning, Mr. Trump quickly agreed to the two dates proposed by the Biden campaign, although it was unclear whether he would agree to Mr. Biden’s other terms.

    Mr. Biden and his top aides want the debates to start much sooner than the dates proposed by the Commission on Presidential Debates, so voters can see the two candidates side by side well before early voting begins in September. They want the debate to occur inside a TV studio, with microphones that automatically cut off when a speaker’s time limit elapses. And they want it to be just the two candidates and the moderator — without the raucous in-person audiences that Mr. Trump feeds on and without the participation of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. or other independent or third-party candidates.

    The proposal suggests that Mr. Biden is willing to take some calculated risks to reverse his fortunes in a race in which most battleground-state polls show the president trailing Mr. Trump and struggling to persuade voters that he’s an effective leader and steward of the economy.

    It is the first formal offer by the Biden campaign for debates with Mr. Trump, who has declared repeatedly that he will debate his successor “anytime and anywhere,” and has demanded as many debates as possible. Mr. Biden recently indicated he would debate Mr. Trump, but had until now declined to give any firm commitment or specific details.

    The letter, signed by Mr. Biden’s campaign chair, Jennifer O’Malley Dillon, and addressed to the Commission on Presidential Debates, notifies the group that Mr. Biden will not be participating in the three general-election debates sponsored by the commission, which are scheduled for Sept. 16, Oct. 1 and Oct. 9.

    It is a striking decision for Mr. Biden, an institutionalist who has tried to preserve the traditions of Washington.

    Instead, Ms. O’Malley Dillon writes in the letter that Mr. Biden will participate in debates hosted by news organizations. The move opens the doors for the Biden team and potentially the Trump team to negotiate directly with networks — and with one another — for possible debates.

    In a video announcing his offer, Mr. Biden taunted Mr. Trump. “Make my day, pal,” he said, adding a reference to the one weekday Mr. Trump’s Manhattan trial is generally not in session. “Let’s pick the date, Donald. I hear you’re free on Wednesdays.

    Mr. Trump, in his insult-laden response, said he would like to see more than two debates and for “excitement purposes, a very large venue.” Calling Mr. Biden “the WORST” debater and “crooked,” he accused the president of being “afraid of crowds.”

    Ms. O’Malley Dillon suggested that the first debate be held in late June, by which time Mr. Trump’s New York criminal trial should be completed and after Mr. Biden returns from the Group of 7 summit meetings with other heads of state.

    A second presidential debate should be held “in early September at the start of the fall campaign season, early enough to influence early voting, but not so late as to require the candidates to leave the campaign trail in the critical late September and October period,” she writes.

    The Biden campaign also proposes that one vice-presidential debate be held in late July after Mr. Trump and his running mate are formally nominated at the Republican National Convention in Milwaukee.

    For the president, early debates hold significant advantages. Early votes are crucial, especially for Democrats. And polls show that Mr. Biden currently trails Mr. Trump and that his messages on core issues like the economy are not resonating with enough voters.

    In the 2020 election, Democrats put a huge emphasis on voting early by mail as a safe alternative to in-person voting during the coronavirus pandemic. Early votes gave Mr. Biden a decisive edge over Mr. Trump, who had told his voters not to trust the mail and to instead vote only on Election Day.

    Mr. Trump and the Republican National Committee have tried to repair that damage this year by telling Republicans to vote early.

    “The commission’s failure, yet again, to schedule debates that will be meaningful to all voters — not just those who cast their ballots late in the fall or on Election Day — underscores the serious limitations of its outdated approach,” Ms. O’Malley Dillon writes in the letter.

    Mr. Trump leads Mr. Biden in most polls of battleground states, including the recent surveys by The New York Times, Siena College and The Philadelphia Inquirer. Significantly more voters trust Mr. Trump over Mr. Biden to handle the economy.

    The Biden campaign and the president’s White House staff widely feel that the debates were important in 2020, and that they will be important again this year.

    The Biden campaign has been trying to remind voters of why a majority removed Mr. Trump from office in 2020. People close to the president have said they’re worried about so-called Trump amnesia — that voters are nostalgic about Mr. Trump and have forgotten how divisive he was — and some of the recent polling underscores that point.

    A side-by-side debate, which could have a large viewing audience, is the most dramatic way for the Biden campaign to give Mr. Trump more exposure, in their view.

    In the first debate in 2020, Mr. Trump barely allowed Mr. Biden to get a word in. He was aggressive and constantly interrupting, while sweating and appearing unwell. Mr. Biden, exasperated, famously said to Mr. Trump, “Will you shut up, man? This is so unpresidential.” And in the days following that first debate, Mr. Trump’s poll numbers fell.

    The Trump campaign’s top officials, Susie Wiles and Chris LaCivita, see the situation differently and share their boss’s eagerness for him to debate Mr. Biden as often as possible. They have indicated that they don’t care who hosts the debate, or where it’s held. The Trump campaign believes, almost to a person, that Mr. Biden has declined significantly since 2020 and would be exposed in a debate against Mr. Trump.

    The letter from Ms. O’Malley Dillon could spell the end of a storied organization that has been running presidential debates since the Reagan era. She makes clear to the commission in her letter that the Biden campaign does not trust the organization to conduct a professional debate, saying it “was unable or unwilling to enforce the rules in the 2020 debates.”

    Among other grievances with the commission, Biden aides are still furious that Mr. Trump debated Mr. Biden in 2020 and appeared visibly under the weather, announcing soon after the debate that he had tested positive for the coronavirus. The Biden team was also livid that members of the Trump family took their masks off when they arrived in the audience for the debate.

    Still, the Biden campaign’s debate proposal comes with conditions. And the decision to sideline the commission offers clear advantages to Mr. Biden. For starters, the Biden campaign proposes limiting the number of debates to only two, whereas the commission has already scheduled three presidential debates.

    Biden campaign officials want the debates to be held in a television studio without an in-person audience that could cheer, boo and derail the conversation, as Trump supporters did during a CNN town hall last year. The commission always invites an audience to watch its presidential debates.

    There’s also a chance that Mr. Kennedy reaches the 15 percent national polling threshold to qualify for the commission’s debates. The Biden campaign views Mr. Kennedy as a spoiler candidate and people close to the president worry that with the Kennedy name he could attract support from voters who might otherwise support Mr. Biden.

    Ms. O’Malley Dillon writes in her letter that the debate should be one-on-one to allow voters “to compare the only two candidates with any statistical chance of prevailing in the Electoral College — and not squandering debate time on candidates with no prospect of becoming president.”

    The Biden campaign has proposed rules — including the automatic cutting-off of microphones — to ensure Mr. Trump does not blow through his time limits and talk over Mr. Biden as he did relentlessly during their first debate in 2020.

    “There should be firm time limits for answers, and alternate turns to speak — so that the time is evenly divided and we have an exchange of views, not a spectacle of mutual interruption,” Ms. O’Malley Dillon writes in the letter.

    “A candidate’s microphone should only be active when it is his turn to speak, to promote adherence to the rules and orderly proceedings.”

    The Biden campaign has also proposed criteria to limit which television networks are allowed to host the debate. It should only be hosted, Ms. O’Malley Dillon writes, by broadcast organizations that hosted both a Republican primary debate in 2016 in which Mr. Trump participated and a Democratic primary debate in 2020 in which Mr. Biden participated — “so neither campaign can assert that the sponsoring organization is obviously unacceptable.”

    Networks that meet that mark include CBS News, ABC News, CNN and Telemundo.

    And the debate moderators “should be selected by the broadcast host from among their regular personnel, so as to avoid a ‘ringer’ or partisan,” Ms. O’Malley Dillon adds.

    The absence of an audience could be a sticking point for Mr. Trump, who has often played to crowds at debates and in town halls, encouraged by their applause, catcalls and jeers.

    Nonetheless, the Trump campaign has been complaining about the commission for months.

    In a statement on May 1 condemning the organization, Ms. Wiles and Mr. LaCivita blasted the group for not agreeing to earlier debates given the fact that early voting begins well before Election Day.

    “We must host debates earlier than ever before,” they said. “Again, we call on every television network in America that wishes to host a debate to extend an invitation to our campaign and we will gladly negotiate with the Biden campaign, with or without the stubborn Presidential Debates Commission.”

    For decades, candidates in both parties have criticized the commission. In 2000, George W. Bush’s campaign tried to engineer its own schedule of debates, but ultimately consented to debates led by the organization.

    In 2012, Republicans complained bitterly about the debates between Mitt Romney, their nominee, and the incumbent, President Barack Obama, when a moderator fact-checked Mr. Romney in real time during one debate.

    In 2016, the Trump campaign fought with the commission over the seating of four women in the Trump family’s box at a debate, three of whom had accused Hillary Clinton’s husband, former President Bill Clinton, of sexual misconduct.

    And in 2020, both the Trump and Biden teams struggled with the commission. Mr. Trump boycotted the second scheduled debate, which the organization decided to make a virtual event.

    In 2022, the Republican National Committee — which has no direct role in negotiating presidential debates with the commission — voted unanimously to have the party nominee pull out of debates with the organization.

    Reid J. Epstein contributed reporting.