Friday, May 10, 2024
More
    Home Blog

    Are R.F.K. Jr. Signature Gatherers Misleading New Yorkers for Ballot Access?

    0

    Amy Bernstein, a traffic court judge in Brooklyn, was heading home from work one night in late April when, she said, a young man carrying a clipboard approached her on the subway platform, asking if she would sign a petition to help place independents on the ballot in New York.

    The top of the petition was folded underneath itself, so that the names of the candidates were not visible, Ms. Bernstein said. She asked for more details and told the man she was a judge — at which point he yanked the clipboard away, she said, and asked: “Am I going to get in trouble?”

    The petition was for Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s independent presidential campaign, which is working to collect the signatures needed to secure a spot for him on the November ballot in New York State. The campaign needs 45,000 but is aiming for more than 100,000. Candidates often collect far more signatures than they need in case some end up being invalidated for various reasons.

    “At a minimum, it’s misleading,” Ms. Bernstein said of the interaction. “I was just pretty much taken aback.”

    More than a half-dozen New York City residents, including two who are journalists at The New York Times and were approached randomly, have described similar encounters with signature gatherers for Mr. Kennedy in Brooklyn over the past three weeks. In each case, the resident was approached by a clipboard-wielding petitioner and asked to support “independent” or “progressive” candidates, or, in one case, to help get Democrats and President Biden on the ballot.

    In three cases, the petitioners said that they were being paid for the work, the people who were approached said; in four cases, the petitioners said they had been told by a supervisor not to show or mention Mr. Kennedy’s name. Descriptions and photographs of the petitioners suggest that they are at least four different people. The petitioners themselves could not be identified or reached for comment.

    In each of the encounters described to The Times, the names of Mr. Kennedy and his running mate, Nicole Shanahan, were hidden by the paper being folded. Only the slate of electors — the little-known people designated to vote for the candidates in the Electoral College — was visible in fine print at the top.

    Most of the New Yorkers who spoke with The Times have experience in law or politics, including two who have worked in Democratic politics. They all said they had found their encounter curious, which led them to post about it on social media or reach out to reporters. In two cases, they reported the matter to state officials.

    Mr. Kennedy’s campaign manager, Amaryllis Fox Kennedy, who is also his daughter-in-law, said the described conduct was “utterly at odds with all of our intensive training and materials.” She said the campaign would take legal action against any paid contractor found to be engaging in such activities.

    Ms. Kennedy said the campaign had a number of paid contractors in New York, who in turn tended to hire local crews, “who themselves often hire others.” She said the campaign would undertake a review of its gathered petitions “for any hint of folded paper,” adding that the campaign staff members responsible for routine fraud checks had not seen any sign of such activity.

    “We take ballot access, voter rights and truthfulness extremely seriously around here,” Ms. Kennedy said. “It’s the very substance of what motivates us to fight the establishment parties in the first place.”

    Slippery or misleading tactics are hardly novel in the world of signature-gathering to gain ballot access for political candidates. Campaigns often turn to outside firms — who in turn hire temporary workers — to perform the time-consuming, expensive work of stopping residents on the street. Mr. Kennedy needs to gather hundreds of thousands of signatures across the country as his campaign scrambles to get him on the ballot in all 50 states, relying on a sprawling network of volunteers, contractors, consultants and lawyers.

    While some of the encounters described to The Times could be considered misleading yet legal, others could fall into the category of election fraud, legal experts said, or could at least be used as fodder for court challenges.

    James A. Gardner, a professor at the University at Buffalo School of Law, said that even folding petitions to conceal the names of candidates probably amounted to fraud. “This is one of those strange instances where the law and common sense align,” Mr. Gardner said.

    The whole point of gathering signatures, Mr. Gardner said, is to show that a base of qualified voters in the state want to vote for that candidate. “There is New York case law that invalidates petitions when the purpose of the petition has been fraudulently misrepresented.”

    He pointed to a 1959 court ruling that arose from a case in Queens, in which a judge ruled that residents had been fraudulently induced to sign a petition supporting a slate of candidates for local office: The petitions had been folded to conceal their true purpose, and people were told they were signing onto school busing or tax proposals. The judge ruled that the candidates could not be placed on the ballot.

    But Jeffrey M. Wice, a professor at New York Law School who specializes in elections and voting rights, said he was not sure if state law explicitly outlawed misleading petitions, or if folding down the sheets would count as altering them illegally.

    “This really gets down to whether the Kennedy petitions are challenged down the road,” Mr. Wice said. “If they are, this could be brought to the court’s attention.”

    Mr. Kennedy, 70, an environmental lawyer who in recent years has become a prominent vaccine skeptic and purveyor of conspiracy theories, is already on the ballot in California, Delaware, Hawaii, Utah and Michigan, a battleground state. His campaign says he has also gathered enough signatures in Idaho, Iowa, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Carolina and Ohio. Legal challenges are all but certain, as Democratic allies of Mr. Biden wage a fierce campaign to block Mr. Kennedy from state ballots.

    New York is one of the least hospitable states for independent and third-party candidates, after the 2020 passage of a law that sharply limited automatic party ballot access and set up stringent rules for gathering signatures. Independent candidates have just six weeks to gather 45,000 verified signatures. Across the country, the process has long been ripe for misleading tactics, mistakes or fraud: Several Republican candidates for governor in Michigan were knocked off the ballot in 2022 because of forged signatures collected by outside petition companies.

    The Kennedy campaign has hundreds of volunteers gathering signatures across New York State. A training document for these volunteers, which was viewed by The Times, gives clear instructions about how to gather petition signatures, starting with: “Do not misrepresent yourself or the petition in any way.”

    The volunteers’ work has been supplemented with paid signature gatherers.

    Jeffrey Norquist, a professor of sociology at Farmingdale State College, said he had been approached on the platform at the Atlantic Avenue-Barclays Center subway station, a heavily trafficked area and major transportation hub in Brooklyn, and was asked if he would sign a petition to get third-party candidates on the ballot.

    “I am usually game for this sort of thing,” Dr. Norquist said. But he noticed that the top of the page had been folded, obscuring the candidates, and he asked why. The man said it was a petition for Mr. Kennedy, and Dr. Norquist walked away.

    Two days later, he saw a man on the same platform — he could not say if it was the same one, “a late-20s basic white dude” — and Dr. Norquist asked him why he was ”deceiving” people. It did not matter, the man said, because Mr. Biden was going to win New York anyway. He said he was just looking to make a few dollars.

    Joel S. Berg, who leads a hunger- and food-security nonprofit group, was out for a run on a Saturday in late April when he saw a man with a petition clipboard. A veteran of Democratic politics and petitioning efforts, Mr. Berg stopped. He recalled that the man said he was trying to help “Joe Biden and other Democrats,” and then murmured: “And Kennedy.”

    Mr. Berg said that he asked the man if he was a paid canvasser, and that the man said he was. “I didn’t really want to bust his chops,” Mr. Berg said. “But if a campaign I liked did something deceptive, I would have been offended.”

    Ira Pearlstein, a lawyer, said he had been approached twice on the sidewalk near Barclays Center in Brooklyn, right above the Atlantic Avenue subway station. The first time, he said, a man told him the petition was for “any candidate” to be placed on the ballot, but when Mr. Pearlstein unfolded it, he saw Mr. Kennedy’s name at the top.

    “I told him this is very misleading, and very undemocratic,” Mr. Pearlstein recounted. The man, he said, responded that he would not bother him anymore.

    The second time, Mr. Pearlstein said he was approached by a young man who said that he was a student, and that he hoped to make some money on the side. Mr. Pearlstein echoed his concern about the misleading petition. “It almost sounded like he didn’t quite know,” Mr. Pearlstein said.

    Mr. Pearlstein said that his wife — who said she had been approached separately — had reported the matter to state election officials.

    A spokeswoman for the New York State Board of Elections referred questions to the board’s division of election-law enforcement, which did not respond to a request for comment.

    Ms. Bernstein, the judge, also reported her encounter to state officials. Then, standing on the subway platform last week, she felt a tap on the shoulder.

    It was the same man, asking if she wanted to sign the same petition.

    She answered with the most New York of questions: “Are you kidding me?”

    Nick Corasaniti contributed reporting.

    Qu Jing: Baidu’s PR chief out after sparking a PR nightmare for the Chinese tech giant

    0

    Editor’s Note: Sign up for CNN’s Meanwhile in China newsletter which explores what you need to know about the country’s rise and how it impacts the world.


    Hong Kong
    CNN
     — 

    The PR chief of Baidu who sparked a public relations crisis with controversial comments endorsing a tough workplace culture has left the Chinese search engine.

    Qu Jing has stepped down from her position as vice president and head of communications, a person familiar with the matter told CNN on condition of anonymity. CNN has also seen a screenshot of an internal personnel system that appears to confirm she no longer works at the company.


    Baidu did not immediately respond to a request for comment. By Thursday night, Qu had removed the title of “Baidu’s vice president” from her account on Douyin, China’s version of TikTok.

    In a series of short videos posted last week on Douyin, Qu spoke about her devotion to her job, strict management style and unflagging demands on her direct reports, hitting a raw nerve with young workers fed up with grueling hours and relentless pressure.

    In one video, she lashed out at an employee who refused to go on a 50-day business trip during the Covid-19 pandemic, when China imposed stringent travel restrictions and quarantines.

    “Why should I take my employee’s family into consideration? I’m not her mother-in-law,” Qu said. “I’m 10 years, 20 years older than you. I didn’t feel bitter about it or tired, even though I have two children. Who are you to tell me that your husband can’t stand it?”

    In another clip, Qu shared her personal sacrifices as a working mother. She was working so hard that she forgot her elder son’s birthday and what grade her younger son was in at school. She said she didn’t regret it because she “chose to become a career woman.”

    “If you work in public relations, don’t expect weekends off,” she said in a third video. “Keep your phone on 24 hours a day, always ready to respond.”

    Qu had apologized earlier in the day and said her posts did not speak for Baidu, but her fiery remarks had already triggered a backlash in China, where young people have long complained about a culture of excessive overwork and highly competitive professional environments, especially in the tech industry.

    The controversy soon became a trending topic on Douyin and Weibo, China’s X-like platform, dominating online discussions. Users criticized Qu for her aggressive and insensitive approach and accused her, and Baidu (BIDU), of promoting a toxic workplace.

    “In her voice and in her tone, there’s deep indifference to and lack of empathy for the common plight of her colleagues,” said Ivy Yang, a China tech analyst and founder of consulting firm Wavelet Strategy.

    “A lot of what she said really struck a nerve, because people feel that in their own workplaces very often. The fact that she said it in a way that’s so direct and in your face, it just generated this kind of emotional reponse,” she said.

    “This is what the bosses are thinking, and she was merely saying it out aloud,” Yang added.

    China’s young workers have increasingly spoken out against the harsh workplace culture that has come to dominate many industries.

    In 2019, Alibaba co-founder Jack Ma drew intense criticism after endorsing the “996” trend, meaning working from 9 a.m. to 9 p.m. six days a week, and calling it a “huge blessing.”

    Yang called the backlash against Ma a “watershed moment” that led people to rethink the relationship between the workplace and themselves — a trend that has only intensified as the Chinese economy slows.

    China’s economy grew stronger than expected at the start of this year, but problems — including a property crisis, declining foreign investment and tepid consumption — are piling up.

    “When companies demand complete loyalty, time and energy from their employees, employees feel there’s no reciprocity or reward for their sacrifice or contribution, especially when things are slowing down. That becomes the central conflict, and this conflict is also at the heart of the Baidu saga,” Yang added.

    As public anger mounted, the videos posted on Qu’s personal Douyin account were taken down.

    After days of silence, Qu apologized on Thursday for “causing such a big storm” in a post on her personal account on WeChat, China’s most popular social media app.

    “I have carefully read all the opinions and comments from various platforms, and many criticisms are very pertinent. I deeply reflect on and humbly accept them,” Qu wrote.

    She also sought to put distance between her remarks and Baidu, saying she had not sought approval beforehand and that they did not represent the company’s stance.

    “There were many inappropriate and unsuitable points made in the videos, which led to misunderstandings about the company’s values and culture, causing serious harm,” Qu wrote.

    A person familiar with the matter said Qu’s clips were part of her push to amplify Baidu’s voice on short video platforms, which have become an increasingly important channel for information dissemination in China.

    Qu had asked all members of the PR team to create their personal accounts, according to the person, who requested anonymity.

    “The main purpose is to improve everyone’s ability to make short videos. Everyone can have different options over the content, and Cristina chose to speak about her personal experience,” said the person, referring to Qu’s English name.

    Qu worked as a reporter for China’s state news agency Xinhua before switching to the PR industry. She joined Baidu in 2021 from Huawei, a Chinese tech giant known for its hard-charging “wolf culture,” where employees are expected to emulate wolves’ bloodthirsty nature, fearlessness and resilience.

    A former Baidu employee said Qu brought Huawei’s aggressive corporate culture with her to Baidu.

    “(She triggered) a pretty big culture shock. About 60% of the team left within months of her arrival,” the former employee told CNN on the condition of anonymity.

    The PR team is expected to always be available, keep their phones on, reply to messages immediately and attend meetings at midnight and on weekends with short notice, the former employee said.

    Qu also adopted the military-style language used in corporate management at Huawei, requiring the team to be “disciplined” and “able to win battles,” the former employee said.

    CNN has reached out to Huawei for comment.

    This article has been updated with additional information.

    Senate Races to Pass Bill to Reauthorize FAA and Improve Air Travel

    0

    The Senate is racing against a Friday deadline to pass legislation to reauthorize the Federal Aviation Administration at a moment of intense uncertainty and disruption in the air travel system, but a host of policy disputes and unrelated issues are threatening to prolong the debate.

    As one of the few remaining bills considered a must-pass item this year, the F.A.A. package has become a magnet for dozens of amendments and policy riders that lawmakers are fighting for a vote on, which has slowed its progress in the Senate. Regional interests have also scrambled the usual political alliances among lawmakers, making quick action trickier.

    “All of us need to work constructively and with urgency to finish the job on F.A.A.,” Senator Chuck Schumer of New York, the majority leader, said on the Senate floor on Wednesday. “Nobody, absolutely nobody, should want us to slip past the deadline. That would needlessly increase risks for so many travelers and so many federal workers.”

    The bill, which would reauthorize the agency for the next five years, would provide more than $105 billion to the F.A.A. and another $738 million to the National Transportation Safety Board for airport modernization, technology programs and safety. It also would bolster the hiring and training of air traffic controllers, codify airlines’ refund obligations to passengers and strengthen protections for passengers with disabilities.

    The legislation is a bipartisan compromise negotiated over months by the Senate and House committees with jurisdiction over the F.A.A., after Congress authorized several short-term extensions of the agency when lawmakers failed to meet earlier deadlines. The House passed its version of the bill almost a year ago in a lopsided vote of 351 to 69.

    “To get F.A.A. done, we need haste and a common desire to get to yes,” Mr. Schumer said on Wednesday. “Any member who insists on extraneous change will only increase the likelihood that we miss the deadline.”

    With the legislation threatening to stall, the House on Wednesday approved a one-week extension before leaving Washington for the weekend. But it was not clear whether the Senate would be able to follow suit before the deadline, and leaders continued to push to move the longer-term overhaul.

    The debate comes at a time of acute uncertainty about the aviation system, which has had a recent spate of concerning episodes such as dangerous near collisions on runways, plane malfunctions and thousands of flight delays and cancellations.

    On Thursday afternoon, the Senate voted overwhelmingly, 84-13, to move the package past a procedural hurdle. Senate leaders said a lopsided vote indicated consensus on the bill and a desire to move quickly, past other lawmakers’ amendment demands.

    Senator Ted Cruz of Texas, the top Republican on the Commerce Committee, said that the Senate had a “very good prospect of passing the bill” by Friday and that he expected “a strong bipartisan vote at the end of the day.”

    “That’s what I’d like to see happen,” he said. “This is a bill that incorporates hundreds of member priorities from both sides of the aisle, makes real strides forward in terms of enhancing safety, in terms of investing in air traffic controllers to reduce delays.”

    Still, each senator has considerable leverage in a body that requires 60 votes to break a filibuster, particularly with the aviation law’s deadline close at hand. They have filed dozens of amendments to the bill that they want Senate leaders to put up for a vote. Some proposals relate to the aviation system, while others are wholly separate pieces of legislation that proponents want to tack onto the F.A.A. bill to increase their chances of passage.

    One of the most intense regional fights has been over a provision in the bill that would add five round-trip flights out of Ronald Reagan National Airport outside Washington, D.C. Proponents, which include Delta Air Lines, have said they want to expand access to the nation’s capital and increase competition.

    But the proposal has incensed lawmakers representing the area, who have argued that the airport maintains the busiest runway in the country and cannot support additional flights. Senators Tim Kaine and Mark Warner of Virginia and Benjamin L. Cardin and Chris Van Hollen of Maryland, all Democrats, filed an amendment to strike the new flights. If they do not receive a vote on their proposal, Mr. Kaine and Mr. Warner threatened on Thursday to object to speedy passage of a one-week extension, which they said would allow leaders to run out the procedural clock on the broader package without allowing any amendment votes.

    Another group of senators was pressing for a vote on their bipartisan proposal to halt the Transportation Security Administration’s expansion of facial recognition technology at airports and restrict it where it is in use.

    Senators have also proposed adding a number of unrelated policy ideas.

    Senator Josh Hawley, Republican of Missouri, demanded a vote on his bill that would expand eligibility for federal compensation for the group of people harmed by exposure to the nation’s nuclear weapons program. (The Senate passed the bill in March, but the House has not taken it up.) He also vowed to block quick approval of an extension if his measure did not receive a vote.

    Mr. Cardin and Mr. Van Hollen wanted to add a bipartisan measure to allow the federal government to fully fund the replacement of the Francis Key Scott Bridge in Baltimore, which collapsed in late March.

    Senators Richard J. Durbin of Illinois, the No. 2 Democrat, and Roger Marshall, Republican of Kansas, wanted to attach their legislation related to credit card competition.

    And Senators Marsha Blackburn, Republican of Tennessee, and Richard Blumenthal, Democrat of Connecticut, were seeking to attach the Kids Online Safety Act, which would require social media networks to take “reasonable measures” to prevent harm to minors on their sites.

    Senate leaders were still working on Thursday afternoon to secure an agreement to speed up the process, and the path to approving the short-term extension was not clear.

    Senator John Thune of South Dakota, the No. 2 Republican, said on Wednesday that it seemed “increasingly unlikely” that an agreement could be reached, but that “there’s always hope.”

    “Everybody’s got holds on this right now,” he said. “Whether or not they get fully exercised remains to be seen.”

    Any major changes the Senate makes to the measure would jam the House, where leaders have urged their colleagues across the Capitol to keep out unrelated provisions.

    The bill is a “carefully negotiated package, and support for the package could be compromised if the Senate starts unraveling key components of the agreement or adding completely unrelated legislation to the package,” said Justin Harclerode, a spokesman for Republicans on the House Transportation Committee. He added that policy riders could “complicate its passage in the House.”

    Air travel industry players have urged quick passage of the bill to address a range of critical issues in the system and to provide the F.A.A. with long-term operating certainty.

    “A4A supports the swift passage of the agreed-upon bipartisan, bicameral language that was released Sunday night after months of thoughtful negotiations,” Airlines for America, a trade group, said in a statement. “Extraneous, nongermane amendments threaten this must-pass bill amid a looming May 10 deadline.”

    “We urge Congress to pass the F.A.A. reauthorization agreement without delay,” Sara Nelson, the president of the Association of Flight Attendants-C.W.A., A.F.L.-C.I.O., said in a statement. “This agreement will stabilize the F.A.A. and provide it with the resources necessary to ensure America’s aviation system remains the gold standard for safety, security and connectivity.”

    US regulators are looking at potential ‘bait and switch’ schemes with airline-affiliated credit card reward points

    0

    Stephanie Keith/Bloomberg/Getty Images

    Airport lounges are just a few of the many perks promised for consumers who use airline reward cards, along with upgrades, frequent flyer miles and points to book travel, buy merchandise or even fund a college savings plan.


    New York
    CNN
     — 

    If you use a points-and-rewards credit card offered by an airline in partnership with a big bank, how much are the points you’ve accrued worth in dollars? And how much do you need to spend to get the best rewards?

    If you’re not sure, you’re probably not alone. The terms and conditions of such card programs can be confusing and in some instances they can be changed at any time.

    Those were two of the issues discussed at a joint hearing held Thursday by the Department of Transportation and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, in an effort to examine ways to improve consumers’ experience with — and financial return from — the popular programs that can generate huge revenue for large airlines.

    “For many families looking to finance a trip or a vacation, those [credit card] benefits are really valuable. … It’s almost seen as savings – something in the bank that you will be able to spend,” said Rohit Chopra, CFPB’s director. “[But] our review of all the fine print suggests that credit card companies and airlines have the power to quickly and dramatically devalue those points by making it more challenging to redeem them. … This creates confusion over the true value of the points and raises some questions about fairness.”

    In some instances, Chopra added, consumers may pay fees for rewards cards “without a clear option to get a refund” when benefits get stripped away.

    Also raised at the hearing was concern for consumers who use rewards cards to carry revolving debt.

    “Consumers with revolving debts on average pay far more in interest and fees than they get back in rewards,” according to a CFPB report released Thursday.

    The hearing featured Chopra and Secretary of Transportation Peter Buttigieg, as well as a panel of consumer advocates and representatives from a few small airlines, a small credit union and a small bank. No one from the major airlines or the top 10 credit card issuing banks was present, although many had been invited, according to CFPB and DOT officials.

    Before the hearing started, however, Rob Nichols, president and CEO of the American Bankers Association, put out a statement.

    “The credit card market in the U.S. is highly competitive, and consumers have hundreds of card issuers and thousands of card reward programs to choose from” Nichols said, citing a Morning Consult survey that indicated 80% of credit card users have at least one credit card offering rewards and that the vast majority say they value them.

    Nichols also cited a bill in Congress that has been strongly opposed by banks, which aims to lower so-called “interchange fees,” which is revenue that banks make on credit card transactions. Such a drop in revenue, banks argue, could jeopardize the availability of rewards programs.

    After the hearing, Jaret Seiberg, a financial services analyst for TD Cowen Washington Research Group, said in a note that he expects the reason for the event is “building the foundation for the CFPB to force changes to airline reward credit cards by ensuring already earned miles cannot be devalued and by preventing airline miles from expiring.”

    But, Seiberg added, “Our expectation remains that the ultimate outcome here is likely tied to the election. We see the CFPB and DOT moving forward if President Biden wins while it is less likely that Trump-controlled agencies would act.”

    Israel-Hamas War Updates: Cease-Fire Talks Stall as Anger Flares Over Rafah

    0

    President Biden’s warning over halting weapons supplies has tightened the bind that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel faces, as he is increasingly caught between international calls for a cease-fire and right-wing Israeli demands to proceed with a wide-scale invasion of Rafah, in southern Gaza.

    Mr. Netanyahu, who has insisted over American objections that invading Rafah is necessary, now finds the U.S.-Israel relationship at a moment of crisis that could affect how he conducts the next phase of the war against Hamas.

    On Thursday, the Israeli leader, alluding to Mr. Biden’s remarks, said in a statement: “If we need to stand alone, we will stand alone. I have said that, if necessary, we will fight with our fingernails. But we have much more than fingernails and with that same strength of spirit, with God’s help, together we will win.”

    With Mr. Biden threatening for the first time to withhold more American weapons, including heavy bombs and artillery shells, if Israel carries out a major operation in Rafah, a city crammed with about a million Palestinians, analysts say that the Israeli military risks losing the support of its most important supplier of foreign arms.

    “The United States provides Israel with a steel dome — it’s not only military support; it’s strategic and political; it’s at the United Nations, the international court, and so on,” said Amos Gilead, a former senior Israeli defense official who worked closely with American security officials for decades.

    “If we lose the United States with the unbelievable friendship of President Biden, it won’t be forgiven,” he added.

    But Rear Adm. Daniel Hagari, spokesman for the Israeli military, said on Thursday that the military had sufficient “munitions for its planned operations, including operations in Rafah.”

    While Israel has enough weapons in its stockpiles to conduct a wide-scale invasion of the Gazan city, U.S. restrictions could force the Israeli military to cut back on deploying specific munitions, experts said.

    “It’s possible we’ll have to economize the way we use our arms and hit more targets without precision bombs,” said Jacob Nagel, a former national security adviser.

    Avi Dadon, a former leader of procurement at Israel’s Defense Ministry, told Kan, the Israeli public broadcaster, that he “could be worried” if American arms were withheld. But outwardly, at least, key members of Mr. Netanyahu’s government said the war effort would not be affected.

    “I turn to Israel’s enemies as well as to our best of friends and say: The state of Israel cannot be subdued,” Defense Minister Yoav Gallant said at a memorial ceremony, adding that the country would do “whatever is necessary” to defend its citizens and “to stand up to those who attempt to destroy us.”

    Bezalel Smotrich, the far-right finance minister, declared that Israel would achieve “complete victory” despite what he described as Mr. Biden’s “pushback and arms embargo.”

    An injured Palestinian child was taken to Al Kuwaiti Hospital in Rafah, in southern Gaza, on Wednesday.Credit…Haitham Imad/EPA, via Shutterstock

    American-made weapons, including heavy bombs, have been essential to Israel’s war effort since the country was attacked by Hamas and other militant groups on Oct. 7. But Mr. Biden has been under growing domestic pressure to rein in Israel’s military as the death toll has risen in Gaza. It is now more than 34,000, according to local health authorities.

    And in his comments on Wednesday in an interview with CNN, Mr. Biden acknowledged for the first time that U.S. bombs had killed innocent civilians in the conflict.

    The American concerns have only grown since the Israeli army sent tanks and troops into the eastern part of Rafah on Monday night, taking over the main border crossing between Gaza and Egypt. Israeli forces have stopped short of entering built-up parts of the city, but Mr. Netanyahu and others have signaled that such an operation is necessary to eliminate Hamas battalions there.

    On Tuesday, American officials said Mr. Biden had withheld 1,800 2,000-pound bombs and 1,700 500-pound bombs that he feared could be dropped on Rafah. The administration was reviewing whether to hold back future transfers, including guidance kits that convert so-called dumb bombs into precision-guided munitions, the officials said.

    In addition to the bombs, Mr. Biden said the United States would not supply artillery shells if Israel invaded population centers in Rafah.

    Gilad Erdan, the Israeli ambassador to the United Nations, described the Biden administration’s decision as “very disappointing” and “frustrating.”

    “We have a cruel enemy here,” he said. “Is this the time to put restrictions on Israel’s weapons?”

    Nadav Eyal, a prominent columnist for a centrist Israeli newspaper, said Mr. Biden had essentially decided to declare an end to the war. Writing on the social media platform X, he called it “the most serious clash between an American administration and the government of Israel since the first Lebanon war.”

    During that conflict, which began in 1982, the Reagan administration suspended the delivery of cluster-type artillery ammunition and other weapons to Israel.

    “We’ve reached a boiling point,” Mr. Eyal said in a follow-up interview. “Issues that have been negotiated behind closed doors have now been brought into the public view in a very ugly way.”

    Some analysts, however, downplayed the significance of the crisis, arguing it wasn’t as bad as past fissures between the United States and Israel. The rupture in relations over the Iran nuclear deal in 2016 was “much worse,” said Mr. Nagel.

    Amid the tense state of affairs, Israel’s president, Isaac Herzog, thanked the United States for supporting Israel and appeared to lash out at Itamar Ben-Gvir, the national security minister, who had posted on X, “Hamas ♥ Biden.”

    “Even when there are disagreements and moments of disappointment between friends and allies, there is a way to clarify the disputes,” Mr. Herzog said.

    Myra Noveck and Johnatan Reiss contributed reporting.

    Elon Musk’s Neuralink reports trouble with first human brain chip

    0
    Enlarge / Elon Musk, in Paris, France, on Friday, June 16, 2023. Musk predicted his Neuralink Corp. would carry out its first brain implant later that year. The first implantation took place in January 2024.

    The first invasive brain chip that Neuralink embedded into a human brain has malfunctioned, with neuron-surveilling threads appearing to have become dislodged from the participant’s brain, the company revealed in a blog post Wednesday.

    It’s unclear what caused the threads to become “retracted” from the brain, how many have retracted, or if the displaced threads pose a safety risk. Neuralink, the brain-computer interface startup run by controversial billionaire Elon Musk, did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Ars. The company said in its blog post that the problem began in late February, but it has since been able to compensate for the lost data to some extent by modifying its algorithm.

    Neuralink touts that its invasive implant includes 64 flexible threads carrying a total of 1,024 electrodes that can detect neuronal activity. Those flexible threads—described as thinner than a human hair—are inserted individually into the brain by the company’s proprietary surgical robot. The goal is for the threads to be placed near neurons of interest so that signals detected by the electrodes can be recorded and decoded into intended actions, such as moving a cursor on a computer screen.

    On January 28, the company announced that it has surgically implanted its brain-computer interface into its first clinical trial participant, 29-year-old Noland Arbaugh, who developed quadriplegia after a 2016 diving accident. The surgery took place at Barrow Neurological Institute in Phoenix. Musk announced on social media on January 29 that Arbaugh was “recovering well” and that the initial results were “promising.”

    Since then, Neuralink and Arbaugh have released video and livestreams of Arbaugh playing video games, using only his implant to make moves in a chess game and control characters in Mario Kart, for instance. The only hint of trouble was on March 1 when Arbaugh answered questions in an all-hands meeting with Neuralink in which he said at one point: “Sure we’re still working out the kinks and stuff. But once we get this figured out, there’s no reason for [the implant] not to be out there,” according to The Wall Street Journal.

    The Journal was the first to report that an unknown number of threads have become displaced in Arbaugh’s brain. Neuralink posted its blog confirming the problem after the Journal published the report.

    It remains unclear why the threads moved from their placement, but one hypothesis that sources told the Journal is that there was air trapped inside Arbaugh’s skull after the surgery, a condition called pneumocephalus. The sources familiar with Neuralink’s trial said that the possibility of removing the implant was considered after the problem was identified.

    Arbaugh’s safety does not appear to be negatively impacted. However, the company reported that the retraction of the threads lowered his bits-per-second (BPS) rate, which is used to measure how quickly and accurately a patient with an implant can control a computer cursor. Neuralink was able to restore the BPS rate to the level seen before retraction by modifying the algorithm that decodes the electrode signals. According to Neuralink, the tweaks included making the implant “more sensitive to neural population signals,” improving the techniques to translate these signals into cursor movements, and enhancing the user interface. The company reported improved and sustained BPS rates after the changes.

    The Journal reported that the company has told the Food and Drug Administration—which regulates clinical trials and granted approval for Neuralink to test its device in humans—that it believes it has fixes for the problem. The company is hoping to carry out two more implantations in the coming months, with a total of 10 this year.

    Eurovision: Thousands protest against Israel’s entry in Malmo

    • By Kathryn Armstrong
    • BBC News

    Image source, EPA-EFE/REX/Shutterstock

    Image caption, Thousands of people have taken to the streets to protest Israel’s participation in Eurovision

    Thousands of pro-Palestinian demonstrators have gathered in the Swedish city of Malmo to protest against Israel’s participation in the Eurovision song contest.

    It comes as the city prepares to host the competition’s second semi-final on Thursday night, in which Israel’s entrant Eden Golan is performing.

    A smaller demonstration in support of Israel has also taken place.

    Climate activist Greta Thunberg was among those attending the pro-Palestinian protest.

    She told the BBC that there was a “moral obligation to act” and to speak out against Israel’s military operation in Gaza.

    “If we are tens of thousands of people flooding the streets of Malmo when Eurovision is taking place, saying we will not accept this to continue, then it’s a very strong signal – and it does make a difference,” Ms Thunberg said.

    Another protester, Matilda Varatta, told Reuters news agency that she would like to see Israel disqualified as Russia was in 2022 following its full-scale invasion of Ukraine.

    “It’s not true that the Eurovision is not political, it has always been political, and it will always be,” she said.

    Earlier, Ms Golan said that she was “proud to represent my country” and that “nothing will deter” her.

    “I’m focused on music, on the good energy, and there are so many people supporting me, and I feel like I have such an honour to represent my country, especially in these times”.

    At the pro-Israel demonstration, people could be heard singing Hurricane in support of Ms Golan amid a significant police presence.

    “I’m not that interested in Eurovision,” one demonstrator, Yael Sages Wahlström, told Sweden’s Svenska Dagbladet newspaper.

    “But since there has been such a huge storm of hate against Israel, I wanted to support”.

    Image source, EPA-EFE/REX/Shutterstock

    Image caption, Crowds of people supporting Israel have also gathered in Malmo

    The Israeli Broadcasting Corporation, which organises the country’s contest entry, says it has asked the European Broadcasting Union to prevent a repeat of Wednesday’s booing incident.

    The Swedish authorities say they have heightened security in place and are prepared for potential unrest.

    Israel is currently engaged in a military campaign in Gaza, which they launched as a response to Hamas’ cross-border attack on southern Israel on 7 October.

    About 1,200 people were killed and 252 others were taken hostage.

    More than 34,900 people have been killed in Gaza since then, according to the territory’s Hamas-run health ministry.

    Akshaya Tritiya 2024: 6 items you should purchase for good luck – Lifestyle News

    0

    For Hindus and Jains in India and globally, the auspicious muhurat of Akshaya Tritiya 2024 will start at 5:33 a.m. and end at 12:18 p.m. on May 10, 2024. People generally celebrate Akshaya Tritiya on the third day of Shukla Paksha during the Vaishakha lunar month. Considering the terms ‘Akti’ or ‘Akha Teej’, this day is considered auspicious and associated with perpetual prosperity.

    Akshaya Tritiya is an important annual festival, considered an auspicious moment to initiate new beginnings in life in terms of establishing a venture or purchasing a new item. According to Astrologer Pandit Jagannath Guruji, people can consider purchasing various items on this auspicious occasion.

    Purchasing Property: Akshaya Tritiya is often considered an auspicious moment to purchase items related to the real estate sector. Thus, owning land or property on Akshaya Tritiya 2024 sounds like a good option. It will not only improve your financial situation, but it will also bring positivity into your life for a brighter future.

    Mud Pot: A mud pot is a lucky charm that might bring you prosperity. Fill the earthen pot with akshat (uncracked rice) and haldi (turmeric) and let it remain until the next year. Performing puja on the clay pot is very important.

    Gold – On this auspicious day, Lord Kuber is said to have been tasked with protecting the heavens’ wealth. Purchasing gold and performing rituals to honour Lord Kuber could bring wealth and success to a family. Gold, with its immense worth and significance, is highly rooted in tradition.

    Purchasing Utensils – Those who wish to spend money on purchasing utensils for their home can also be a great option on Akshaya Tritiya. As per Vedic astrology, bringing home new utensils on this day, specially made of brass or copper, is considered auspicious. They are known to welcome good vibes and luck.

    Seeds: Seeds are a symbol of hope and the ability for growth. The ritual of planting seeds on Akshaya Tritiya signifies the prayer of positive energy and the desire of the divine in future efforts.

    Yantras: People should purchase Yantras on Akshay Tritiya as they are extremely auspicious and effective on this day. Yantras are geometrical patterns representing different gods or cosmic powers. They are used during Puja ceremonies to concentrate the mind and direct spiritual energies.

    Why the Phillies can’t — and won’t — get ahead of themselves despite start as MLB’s best team – NBC Sports Philadelphia

    0

    And, on the forty-third day of the longest season, the Phillies rested.

    It has likely come to your attention that, while in repose waiting to begin their weekend series against the Marlins at loanDepot Park, your Fightins’ woke Thursday in possession of the best record (26-12) in all of Major League Baseball.

    To put a slightly finer point on it, they’ve clearly accomplished their stated spring training goal of getting off to a fast start.

    Which made a comment from Rob Thomson after Saturday night’s two touchdowns-to-a-field goal win over the Giants interesting. It wasn’t in response to a specific question. It was an offhand remark, almost as if he was thinking out loud.

    “We’ve got to stay humble and keep going,” the manager said.

    With that in mind, before the Phillies closed out a hugely successful homestand with a 5-3 loss to the Blue Jays that ended their winning streak at seven Wednesday afternoon at Citizens Bank Park, Thomson was asked if his antennae are up for signs of overconfidence.

    “Absolutely,” he said. “This game will humble you in a hurry if you think you’re better than what you really are. We’ve got a good club. But we just need to keep grinding, keep playing, keep being ourselves.”

    In that spirit, here are some helpful reminders that the 2024 season is just now starting to get warmed up. That more than three-quarters of the schedule remains. That having the best record in baseball on May 9, along with 11 bucks, will get you a roast pork sandwich at Di Nic’s in the Reading Terminal Market.

    Not to be a buzz kill. Just numbers that underscore Thomson’s pragmatism.

    On this date in baseball history, for the last four full seasons, here are the teams that were No. 1 in the overall standings – and where they finished – followed by the eventual World Series winner and its overall position at the same time.

    Spoiler alert. All made the postseason. None advanced to the World Series, much less won it.

     May 9, 2019 — Minnesota Twins, 23-12 (.657)

    • Rest of the way: 78-49 (.614)
    • Finished first in AL Central, lost in division series
    • Hoisted the trophy: Nationals, on May 9: 15-22 (.405), 26th (tie)

    May 9, 2021 – Boston Red Sox, 22-13 (.629)

    • Rest of the way: 71-57 (.555)
    • Finished second in AL East; lost in LCS
    • Hoisted the trophy: Braves, on May 9: 14-16 (.467), 17th

    May 9, 2022 – Los Angeles Dodgers, 19-7 (.731)

    • Rest of the way: 92-44 (.676)
    • Finished 1st in NL West, lost in division series
    • Hoisted the trophy: Astros, on May 9: 18-11 (.621), 7th (tie)

    May 9, 2023 – Tampa Bay Rays, 29-7 (.806)

    • Rest of the way: 70-56 (.556)
    • Finished 2nd in AL East, lost in wild card round
    • Hoisted the trophy: Rangers, on May 9: 21-13 (.618), 4th

    The last time a team with the best record at this juncture went on to win it all was 2018 when the Yankees and Red Sox were tied at 25-10 (.714). There’s no reason why the Phillies can’t follow in those footsteps. This is just to say that they haven’t clinched a dang thing yet. Including dethroning the Braves at the top of the NL East.

    They have a 2-game lead over the team that has won the division six straight seasons. They’ve also had a remarkably favorable early schedule. Since opening the season with a head-to-head series against the Braves, the Phillies haven’t played a team that’s currently above .500. Other than Atlanta, they haven’t faced a single team with one of the Top 10 records in baseball.

    In addition to the Phillies, Atlanta has played the Dodgers, Indians, Red Sox, Mariners and Rangers – all winning teams. That imbalance will even out over the next four-and-a-half months.

    Injuries can dramatically alter the MLB landscape between now and the end of September. So can the trades teams make – and don’t make – before the deadline.

    One final date point: The Phillies are 15-6 at Citizens Bank Park where their home winning streak ended at 11 on Wednesday. The back half of the schedule is backloaded with road games when 44 of 78 (56.4 percent) of the dates are denoted by white squares on your handy pocket schedules.

    Again, the Phillies have put themselves in a terrific position. But Thomson has been around long enough to know that there are no guarantees in May. He understands there can be a hobgoblin around almost any corner, even against a Marlins team with the third-worst record in baseball.

    “Now we go into Miami. There probably won’t be many people at the ballpark. So you’ve got to create your own energy internally,” he said. “And we have a good group of people who can do that. They tend to bring it every day. So that’s really the only thing for me.

    “What happened the last two years at the end (losing to Houston in the ’22 World Series, losing to Arizona in the ’23 NLCS) is really motivating for this group. I think the entire room is competitive and they feed off each other that way. These guys come to play every day. They are tough. And they have fun at the same time. So it’s a special group. It really is.”

    Exactly how special, though, won’t be determined until October.

    Subscribe anywhere you get your podcasts:
    Apple Podcasts | Youtube Music | Spotify | Stitcher | Art19 | RSSWatch on YouTube

    Footprints in China suggest new megaraptor that roamed with dinosaurs

    0


    An international team of researchers estimated that the fossilized footprints found in China were left by a dinosaur that would be among the largest raptors ever discovered.

    play

    The Velociraptors of “Jurassic Park” were terrifyingly large, merciless killing machines.

    The stuff of nightmares, yes. The stuff of reality? Not so much.

    Scientific research has long held the real Velociraptors were a far cry from the predatory beasts depicted in the film series, growing to be not much larger than wolves and covered in not-so-scary feathers.

    But a team of paleontologists said they may have identified a close cousin to the Velociraptor, a so-called megaraptor, that is much closer to the size of the dinos depicted in the films. In fact, the international team of researchers estimated that the fossilized footprints found in China were left by a dinosaur that would be among the largest raptors ever discovered.

    While it may dwarf the raptors of “Jurassic Park,” researcher Anthony Romilio said the creature has some key differences from its fictional counterpart.

    “When people think of raptor dinosaurs, they most likely think of those in the ‘Jurassic Park’ movies – human-sized, muscly, aggressive hunters,” Romilio, a paleontologist at the University of Queensland, said in a statement. “But these tracks were left by a much slimmer and brainier group in the Velociraptor family.”

    Preserved footprints found in 2020 in China

    The tracks are among more than 240 footprints discovered in 2020 in an area of southeastern China where dinosaurs roamed tens of millions of years ago, the researchers said.

    The researchers found a set of five tracks that were more than 13 inches long and were immediately recognizable because the footprints featured just two toes – a characteristic unique to raptors.

    “We found this track type is distinct in shape, making it quite unique,” Romilio said.

    The team determined the footprints were likely made by a relative of the velociraptor, which they’ve named Fujianipus yingliangi as a nod to the Fujian province where the tracks were found.

    Based on the size of the tracks, the creature was estimated to have been nearly six feet tall and 15 feet long. That’s about two to three times the total length of the velociraptor, making it among the largest of the known raptors.

    Megaraptor roamed during Cretaceous period

    Finding fossilized bones would provide researchers with more insight into what exactly the animal looked like and just how imposing it was.

    But the team said they gleaned enough to determine that the megaraptor was a troodontid, a dinosaur family with legs nearly long as long as six feet, far exceeding other known raptor sizes. The birdlike raptors existed during the Cretaceous period about 145 to 66 million years ago, a few million years more recent than the Jurassic period.

    Their size makes the Fujianipus a relative outlier among its raptor brethren that mostly remained small.

    “It just goes to show the incredible size range among raptor dinosaurs,” Romilio said, “highlighting their adaptability and ecological diversity.”

    The research is published in the journal iScience.

    Eric Lagatta covers breaking and trending news for USA TODAY. Reach him at elagatta@gannett.com