Tuesday, May 21, 2024
More
    Home Blog Page 1502

    COVID-19–Associated Hospitalizations Among Adults During SARS-CoV-2 Delta and Omicron Variant Predominance, by Race/Ethnicity and Vaccination Status — COVID-NET, 14 States, July 2021–January 2022

    0

    On March 18, 2022, this report was posted online as an MMWR Early Release.

    Christopher A. Taylor, PhD1; Michael Whitaker, MPH1; Onika Anglin, MPH1,2; Jennifer Milucky, MSPH1; Kadam Patel, MPH1,2; Huong Pham, MPH1; Shua J. Chai, MD3,4; Nisha B. Alden, MPH5; Kimberly Yousey-Hindes, MPH6; Evan J. Anderson, MD7,8,9; Kenzie Teno, MPH10; Libby Reeg, MPH11; Kathryn Como-Sabetti, MPH12; Molly Bleecker, MA13; Grant Barney, MPH14; Nancy M. Bennett, MD15; Laurie M. Billing, MPH16; Melissa Sutton, MD17; H. Keipp Talbot, MD18; Keegan McCaffrey19; Fiona P. Havers, MD1; COVID-NET Surveillance Team (View author affiliations)

    View suggested citation

    Summary

    What is already known about this topic?

    SARS-CoV-2 infections can result in COVID-19–associated hospitalizations, even among vaccinated persons.

    What is added by this report?

    In January 2022, unvaccinated adults and those vaccinated with a primary series, but no booster or additional dose, were 12 and three times as likely to be hospitalized, respectively, as were adults who received booster or additional doses. Hospitalization rates among non-Hispanic Black adults increased more than rates in other racial/ethnic groups.

    What are the implications for public health practice?

    All adults should stay up to date with COVID-19 vaccination to reduce their risk for COVID-19–associated hospitalization. Implementing strategies that result in the equitable receipt of COVID-19 vaccinations among persons with disproportionately higher hospitalizations rates, including non-Hispanic Black adults, is an urgent public health priority.

    Altmetric:
    Citations:
    Views:

    Views equals page views plus PDF downloads

    Beginning the week of December 19–25, 2021, the B.1.1.529 (Omicron) variant of SARS-CoV-2 (the virus that causes COVID-19) became the predominant circulating variant in the United States (i.e., accounted for >50% of sequenced isolates).* Information on the impact that booster or additional doses of COVID-19 vaccines have on preventing hospitalizations during Omicron predominance is limited. Data from the COVID-19–Associated Hospitalization Surveillance Network (COVID-NET) were analyzed to compare COVID-19–associated hospitalization rates among adults aged ≥18 years during B.1.617.2 (Delta; July 1–December 18, 2021) and Omicron (December 19, 2021–January 31, 2022) variant predominance, overall and by race/ethnicity and vaccination status. During the Omicron-predominant period, weekly COVID-19–associated hospitalization rates (hospitalizations per 100,000 adults) peaked at 38.4, compared with 15.5 during Delta predominance. Hospitalizations rates increased among all adults irrespective of vaccination status (unvaccinated, primary series only, or primary series plus a booster or additional dose). Hospitalization rates during peak Omicron circulation (January 2022) among unvaccinated adults remained 12 times the rates among vaccinated adults who received booster or additional doses and four times the rates among adults who received a primary series, but no booster or additional dose. The rate among adults who received a primary series, but no booster or additional dose, was three times the rate among adults who received a booster or additional dose. During the Omicron-predominant period, peak hospitalization rates among non-Hispanic Black (Black) adults were nearly four times the rate of non-Hispanic White (White) adults and was the highest rate observed among any racial and ethnic group during the pandemic. Compared with the Delta-predominant period, the proportion of unvaccinated hospitalized Black adults increased during the Omicron-predominant period. All adults should stay up to date (1) with COVID-19 vaccination to reduce their risk for COVID-19–associated hospitalization. Implementing strategies that result in the equitable receipt of COVID-19 vaccinations, through building vaccine confidence, raising awareness of the benefits of vaccination, and removing barriers to vaccination access among persons with disproportionately higher hospitalizations rates from COVID-19, including Black adults, is an urgent public health priority.

    COVID-NET conducts population-based surveillance for laboratory-confirmed COVID-19–associated hospitalizations in 99 counties across 14 states.§ COVID-19–associated hospitalizations are those occurring among residents of a predefined surveillance catchment area who have a positive real-time reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) or rapid antigen detection test result for SARS-CoV-2 during hospitalization or the 14 days preceding admission.

    This analysis describes weekly hospitalization rates during Delta- and Omicron-predominant periods. Among nonpregnant and pregnant adults aged ≥18 years, hospitalization rates were calculated overall, and by race/ethnicity and COVID-19 vaccination status. Age-adjusted rates were calculated by dividing the number of hospitalized COVID-19 patients by population estimates for race/ethnicity, and vaccination status in the catchment area. Vaccination status (unvaccinated, receipt of a primary series only, or receipt of a primary series plus a booster or additional dose) was determined for individual hospitalized patients and for the catchment population using state immunization information systems data (2).** Monthly incidence among adults who received booster or additional doses was calculated by summing the total number of COVID-19 patients with booster or additional doses hospitalized over all days of the month and dividing by the sum of adults with booster or additional doses in the underlying population for each day of the month.†† This method was also used for calculations in unvaccinated persons and those who received a primary series but not a booster or additional dose.§§

    Using previously described methods (3), investigators collected clinical data on a representative sample of adult patients (7.9%) hospitalized during July 1, 2021–January 31, 2022, stratified by age and COVID-NET site. Surveillance officers abstracted data on sampled patients from medical charts. Pregnant women were excluded because their reasons for hospital admission (4) might differ from those for nonpregnant persons.

    Variances were estimated using Taylor series linearization method. Chi-square tests were used to compare differences between the Delta- and Omicron-predominant periods; p-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. Percentages presented were weighted to account for the probability of selection for sampled cases (3). Analyses were conducted using SAS statistical software survey procedures (version 9.4; SAS Institute). This activity was reviewed by CDC and conducted consistent with applicable federal law and CDC policy.¶¶

    During the Omicron-predominant period, overall weekly adult hospitalization rates peaked at 38.4 per 100,000, exceeding the previous peak on January 9, 2021 (26.1) and the peak rate during the Delta-predominant period (15.5) (Figure 1). Age-adjusted hospitalization rates among Black adults peaked at 94.7 (January 8, 2022), higher than that among all other racial and ethnic groups, 3.8 times the rate among White adults (24.8) for the same week, and 2.5 times the previous peak (January 16, 2021) among Black adults (37.2). This was the highest age-adjusted weekly rate observed among any racial and ethnic group during the pandemic. During the Omicron-predominant period, hospitalization rates increased among unvaccinated persons and those who completed a primary series, with and without receipt of a booster or additional dose (Figure 2). Weekly rates among unvaccinated adults and adults who received a primary COVID-19 vaccination series with a booster or additional dose peaked at 149.8 (January 8, 2022) and 11.7 (January 22, 2022), respectively. The cumulative monthly age-adjusted hospitalization rate during January 2022 among unvaccinated adults (528.2) was 12 times the rates among those who had received a booster or additional dose (45.0) and four times the rates among adults who received a primary series, but no booster or additional dose (133.5). The rate among adults who received a primary series, but no booster or additional dose (133.5), was three times the rate among adults who received a booster or additional dose (45.0).

    Clinical information was abstracted for 5,681 adults with COVID-19–associated hospitalization during July 1, 2021–January 31, 2022 (Table). Black adults accounted for a higher percentage of hospitalizations during the Omicron-predominant period (26.7%) than during the Delta-predominant period (22.2%, p = 0.05). Among all adults, relative to the Delta-predominant period, COVID-19–related illness was the primary reason for admission for a smaller percentage of hospitalizations (87.5% versus 95.5%, p<0.01), and median length of stay was shorter (4 versus 5 days, p<0.01) during the Omicron-predominant period; during this period, the proportion of patients admitted to an intensive care unit, who received invasive mechanical ventilation, and who died in-hospital decreased significantly (all p<0.01).

    Among 829 adults hospitalized during the Omicron-predominant period, 49.4% were unvaccinated, compared with 69.5% during the Delta-predominant period (p<0.01). The proportion of hospitalized adults who received booster or additional doses increased from 1.3% during the Delta-predominant period to 13.4% during the Omicron-predominant period (p<0.01)***; among these, 10.7% were long-term care facility residents and 69.5% had an immunosuppressive condition.††† Black adults accounted for 25.2% of all unvaccinated persons hospitalized during the Delta-predominant period; that proportion increased by 23%, to 31.0% during the Omicron-predominant period. Relative to the Delta-predominant period, the proportion of cases in non-Hispanic Asian or Pacific Islanders also increased, whereas the proportion in all other racial and ethnic groups decreased. The proportion of hospitalized Black adults who received a primary COVID-19 vaccination series with or without a booster or additional dose increased from 4.7% and 14.9%, respectively, during the Delta-predominant period to 14.8% and 25.5%, respectively, during the Omicron-predominant period; Hispanic adults experienced smaller increases.

    Discussion

    During the period of Omicron predominance, hospitalization rates increased most sharply among Black adults in the United States relative to all other racial and ethnic groups examined and reached the highest rate observed among all racial and ethnic groups since the beginning of the pandemic. Relative to the Delta-predominant period, a larger proportion of hospitalized Black adults were unvaccinated. Although hospitalization rates increased for all adults, rates were highest among unvaccinated adults and lowest among adults who had received a primary series and a booster or additional dose. Hospitalization rates during peak Omicron circulation (January 2022) among unvaccinated adults remained 12 times the rates among vaccinated adults who received booster or additional doses and four times the rates among adults who received a primary series, but no booster or additional dose. The rate among adults who received a primary series, but no booster or additional dose, was three times the rate among adults who received a booster or additional dose. This is consistent with data showing the incidence of positive SARS-CoV-2 test results or death from COVID-19 is higher among unvaccinated adults and adults who have not received a booster than among those who have received a booster or additional dose (5).

    Relative to the Delta-predominant period, a significantly shorter median length of hospital stay was observed during the Omicron-predominant period and smaller proportions of hospitalizations with intensive care unit admission, receipt of invasive mechanical ventilation, or in-hospital death. Other studies found similarly decreased proportions of severe outcomes among hospitalized patients with COVID-19 during this period (6).§§§

    The prevalence of primary COVID-19 vaccination and of receipt of a booster dose were lower among Black adults compared with White adults. As of January 26, 2022, 39.6% of Black persons received a primary vaccine series; of those, 43.9% of adults received a booster dose once eligible. These proportions are lower compared with 47.3% of White persons who received a primary series and 54.5% of eligible adults who received a booster dose.¶¶¶ Relative to the Delta-predominant period, Black adults accounted for a larger proportion of unvaccinated adults during the Omicron-predominant period, and age-adjusted hospitalization rates for Black adults increased to the highest rate among all racial and ethnic groups for any week during the pandemic. A previous study conducted before the Omicron-predominant period that showed increased risk for COVID-19–associated hospitalization among certain racial and ethnic groups, including Black adults, and suggested the increased hospitalization rates were likely multifactorial and could include increased prevalence of underlying medical conditions, increased community-level exposure to and incidence of COVID-19, and poor access to health care in these groups (7). The increase in transmissibility of the Omicron variant might have amplified these risks for hospitalization, resulting in increased hospitalization rates among Black adults compared with White adults, irrespective of vaccination status. Taken together, these findings suggest that the increased risk for hospitalization among Black adults during the Omicron-predominant period might also be due, in part, to lower proportions of Black adults receiving both the primary vaccination series and booster doses.

    The findings in this report are subject to at least four limitations. First, COVID-19–associated hospitalizations might have been missed because of hospital testing practices and test availability. Second, vaccination status is subject to misclassification; this might affect estimation of rates by vaccination status. Third, because immunocompromise status is not always known, it is not possible to distinguish between booster and additional doses; this could have influenced observed rates. Finally, the COVID-NET catchment areas include approximately 10% of the U.S. population; thus, these findings might not be nationally generalizable.

    Coinciding with Omicron variant predominance, COVID-19–associated hospitalization rates among adults increased in late December 2021 and peaked in January 2022; rates increased more among Black adults relative to rates among adults of other racial and ethnic groups. Rates were highest among unvaccinated adults and lowest among those who had received a booster or additional dose. All adults should stay up to date (1) with COVID-19 vaccination to reduce their risk for COVID-19–associated hospitalization. Implementing strategies that result in the equitable receipt of COVID-19 vaccinations, though building vaccine confidence, raising awareness of the benefits of vaccination, and removing barriers to vaccination access among persons with disproportionately higher hospitalizations rates from COVID-19, including Black adults, is an urgent public health priority.

    Acknowledgments

    Arthur Reingold, Jeremy Roland, Ashley Coates, California Emerging Infections Program, Oakland, California; Breanna Kawasaki, Rachel Herlihy, Isaac Armistead, Madelyn Lensing, Jordan Surgnier, Sarah McLafferty, Colorado Department of Public Health & Environment; Ann Basting, Tessa Carter, Maria Correa, Daewi Kim, Carol Lyons, Hazhia Sorosindi, Connecticut Emerging Infections Program, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut; Emily Fawcett, Katelyn Ward, Jana Manning, Asmith Joseph, Allison Roebling, Chandler Surell, Stephanie Lehman, Taylor Eisenstein, Suzanne Segler, Grayson Kallas, Marina Bruck, Rayna Ceaser, Annabel Patterson, Sabrina Hendrick, Johanna Hernandez, Hope Wilson, School of Medicine, Emory University, Georgia Emerging Infections Program, Georgia Department of Public Health, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Foundation for Atlanta Veterans Education and Research, Atlanta, Georgia; Jim Collins, Shannon Johnson, Justin Henderson, Sue Kim, Alexander Kohrman, Lauren Leegwater, Val Tellez Nunez, Sierra Peguies-Khan, Michigan Department of Health and Human Services; Kayla Bilski, Kristen Ehresmann, Richard Danila, Jake Garfin, Grace Hernandez, Kieu My Phi, Ruth Lynfield, Sara Vetter, Xiong Wang, Minnesota Department of Health; Daniel M. Sosin, Susan L. Ropp, Sunshine Martinez, Jasmyn Sanchez, Cory Cline, Melissa Judson, Florent Nkouaga, Mark Montoya, New Mexico Department of Health; Sarah Lathrop, Kathy M. Angeles, Yadira Salazar-Sanchez, Sarah A. Khanlian, Nancy Eisenberg, Dominic Rudin, Sarah Shrum Davis, Mayvilynne Poblete, Emily B. Hancock, Francesca Pacheco, New Mexico Emerging Infections Program; Yassir Talha, Celina Chavez, Jennifer Akpo, Alesia Reed, Murtada Khalifa, CDC Foundation, New Mexico Department of Health; Suzanne McGuire, Kerianne Engesser, Nancy Spina, Adam Rowe, New York State Department of Health; Sophrena Bushey, Virginia Cafferky, Maria Gaitan, Christine Long, Thomas Peer, Kevin Popham, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York; Julie Freshwater, Denise Ingabire-Smith, Ann Salvator, Rebekah Sutter, Ohio Department of Health; Sam Hawkins, Public Health Division, Oregon Health Authority; Tiffanie Markus, Katie Dyer, Karen Leib, Terri McMinn, Danielle Ndi, Gail Hughett, Emmanuel Sackey, Kathy Billings, Anise Elie, Manideepthi Pemmaraju, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee; Amanda Carter, Andrea George, Andrew Haraghey, Ashley Swain, Caitlin Shaw, Laine McCullough, Mary Hill, Ryan Chatelain, Salt Lake County Health Department, Salt Lake City, Utah; Alvin Shultz, Robert W. Pinner, Rainy Henry, Sonja Mali Nti-Berko, CDC; Elizabeth Daly, Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists.

    COVID-NET Surveillance Team

    Gretchen Rothrock, California Emerging Infections Program; Millen Tsegaye, Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment; Julie Plano, Connecticut Emerging Infections Program, Yale School of Public Health; Kyle Openo, Georgia Emerging Infections Program, Georgia Department of Public Health Division of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, Emory University; Andy Weigel, Iowa Department of Health; Chloe Brown, Michigan Department of Health and Human Services; Erica Bye, Minnesota Department of Health; Wickliffe Omondi, New Mexico Emerging Infections Program, University of New Mexico; Alison Muse, New York State Department of Health; Christina Felsen, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry; Eli Shiltz, Ohio Department of Health; Nasreen Abdullah, Public Health Division, Oregon Health Authority; William Schaffner, Vanderbilt University Medical Center; Melanie Crossland, Salt Lake County Health Department


    References

    1. CDC. Stay up to date with your COVID-19 vaccines. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC; 2022. Accessed March 10, 2022. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/stay-up-to-date.html
    2. Moline HL, Whitaker M, Deng L, et al. Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines in preventing hospitalization among adults aged ≥65 years—COVID-NET, 13 states, February–April 2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2021;70:1088–93. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm7032e3external icon PMID:34383730external icon
    3. Garg S, Patel K, Pham H, et al. Clinical trends among U.S. adults hospitalized with COVID-19, March to December 2020: a cross-sectional study. Ann Intern Med 2021;174:1409–19. https://doi.org/10.7326/M21-1991external icon PMID:34370517external icon
    4. Delahoy MJ, Whitaker M, O’Halloran A, et al.; COVID-NET Surveillance Team. Characteristics and maternal and birth outcomes of hospitalized pregnant women with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19—COVID-NET, 13 states, March 1–August 22, 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2020;69:1347–54. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6938e1external icon PMID:32970655external icon
    5. Johnson AG, Amin AB, Ali AR, et al. COVID-19 incidence and death rates among unvaccinated and fully vaccinated adults with and without booster doses during periods of Delta and Omicron variant emergence—25 U.S. Jurisdictions, April 4–December 25, 2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2022;71:132–8. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm7104e2external icon PMID:35085223external icon
    6. Iuliano AD, Brunkard JM, Boehmer TK, et al. Trends in disease severity and health care utilization during the early Omicron variant period compared with previous SARS-CoV-2 high transmission periods—United States, December 2020–January 2022. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2022;71:146–52. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm7104e4external icon PMID:35085225external icon
    7. Acosta AM, Garg S, Pham H, et al. Racial and ethnic disparities in rates of COVID-19–associated hospitalization, intensive care unit admission, and in-hospital death in the United States from March 2020 to February 2021. JAMA Netw Open 2021;4:e2130479. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.30479external icon PMID:34673962external icon
    Return to your place in the textFIGURE 1. Weekly COVID-19–associated hospitalization rates* among adults aged ≥18 years, by race and ethnicity — COVID-19–Associated Hospitalization Surveillance Network, 14 states, March 2020–January 2022
    The figure is an epidemiologic curve showing the weekly COVID-19–associated hospitalization rates among adults aged ≥18 years, using data from the COVID-19–Associated Hospitalization Surveillance Network, in 14 states, during March 2020–January 2022.

    * Overall rates are unadjusted; rates presented by racial and ethnic group are age-adjusted.

    Selected counties in California, Colorado, Connecticut, Georgia, Iowa, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, New Mexico, New York, Ohio, Oregon, Tennessee, and Utah (https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/69/wr/mm6915e3.htm). Starting the week ending December 4, 2021, Maryland data are not included in weekly rate calculations but are included in previous weeks.

    Return to your place in the textFIGURE 2. Weekly age-adjusted rates of COVID-19–associated hospitalizations among adults aged ≥18 years, by vaccination status* — COVID-19–Associated Hospitalization Surveillance Network, 13 states, September 4, 2021–January 29, 2022§
    The figure is an epidemiologic curve showing weekly age-adjusted rates of COVID-19-associated hospitalizations among adults aged ≥18 years, by vaccination status, using data from the COVID-19–Associated Hospitalization Surveillance Network, in 13 states, during September 4, 2021–January 29, 2022.

    Abbreviation: COVID-NET = COVID-19–Associated Hospitalization Surveillance Network.

    * Adults who completed a primary vaccination series were defined as those who had received the second dose of a 2-dose primary vaccination series or a single dose of a 1-dose product ≥14 days before a positive SARS-CoV-2 test associated with their hospitalization but received no booster dose. Adults who received booster doses were classified as those who completed the primary series and received an additional or booster dose on or after August 13, 2021, at any time after completion of the primary series, and ≥14 days before a positive test result for SARS-CoV-2, because COVID-19–associated hospitalizations are a lagging indicator and time passed after receipt of a booster dose has been shown to be associated with reduced rates of COVID-19 infection (https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2114255external icon). Adults with no documented receipt of any COVID-19 vaccine dose before the test date were considered unvaccinated.

    Selected counties in California, Colorado, Connecticut, Georgia, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, New Mexico, New York, Ohio, Oregon, Tennessee, and Utah (https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/69/wr/mm6915e3.htm). Iowa does not provide data on vaccination status.

    § Starting the week ending December 4, 2021, Maryland data are not included in weekly rate calculations but are included in previous weeks. To ensure stability and reliability of rates by vaccination status, data are presented beginning when 14 days have passed since at least 5% of the population of adults aged ≥18 years in the COVID-NET surveillance catchment area had received an additional or booster dose.

    TABLE. Demographic characteristics and clinical interventions and outcomes in COVID-19–associated hospitalizations among nonpregnant adults aged ≥18 years (N = 5,681),* by vaccination status and period of SARS-CoV-2 variant predominance§ — COVID-NET, 14 states, July 2021–January 2022Return to your place in the text
    Characteristic Variant predominance period, no. (%)
    Total hospitalizations** Vaccination status
    Unvaccinated Primary series, no booster Primary series, plus booster
    Delta (Jul 1–Dec 18) Omicron (Dec 19–Jan 31) p-value†† Delta (Jul 1–Dec 18) Omicron (Dec 19–Jan 31) Delta (Jul 1–Dec 18) Omicron (Dec 19–Jan 31) Delta (Jul 1–Dec 18) Omicron (Dec 19–Jan 31)
    Overall§§ 4,852 (64.1) 829 (35.9) 3,269 (71.8) 409 (28.2) 1,183 (58.0) 255 (42.0) 45 (15.3) 93 (84.7)
    Median age, yrs, (IQR) 60 (47–72) 64 (49–77) <0.01 56 (43–67) 60 (46–77) 71 (61–80) 66 (52–78) 75 (69–82) 69 (59–79)
    Age group, yrs
    18–49 1,419 (28.7) 251 (25.6) 0.01 1,185 (36.6) 141 (30.3) 140 (10.1) 71 (21.1) 2 (1.3) 13 (13.2)
    50–64 1,723 (30.4) 265 (26.6) 1,274 (33.7) 142 (28.8) 310 (21.2) 77 (26.3) 7 (9.5) 23 (21.1)
    ≥65 1,710 (40.9) 313 (47.9) 810 (29.7) 126 (40.9) 733 (68.6) 107 (52.5) 36 (89.2) 57 (65.7)
    Sex
    Men 2,574 (52.7) 435 (52.2) 0.83 1,751 (52.7) 225 (51.5) 610 (53.2) 127 (50.8) 21 (38.4) 50 (60.8)
    Women 2,278 (47.3) 394 (47.8) 1,518 (47.3) 184 (48.5) 573 (46.8) 128 (49.2) 24 (61.6) 43 (39.2)
    Race/Ethnicity¶¶
    White, non-Hispanic 2,917 (54.4) 474 (47.6) 0.05 1,852 (50.2) 222 (40.7) 817 (63.1) 137 (46.4) 41 (87.9) 71 (70.8)
    Black, non-Hispanic 943 (22.2) 185 (26.7) 687 (25.2) 98 (31.0) 169 (14.9) 60 (25.5) 3 (4.7) 11 (14.8)
    American Indian or Alaska Native, non-Hispanic 63 (1.5) 8 (1.0) 46 (1.5) 5 (1.5) 15 (1.9) 3 (1.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
    Asian or Pacific Islander, non-Hispanic 133 (3.6) 19 (4.6) 88 (3.4) 9 (5.4) 36 (4.6) 7 (11.8) 0 (0.0) 3 (5.9)
    Hispanic 589 (12.3) 43 (8.2) 447 (13.7) 52 (12.9) 101 (9.3) 33 (11.2) 1 (7.4) 6 (7.9)
    LTCF residence*** 264 (5.6) 53 (7.2) 0.18 76 (2.8) 14 (4.3) 155 (12.4) 24 (9.3) 9 (18.4) 11 (10.7)
    Any underlying medical condition††† 4,195 (88.5) 729 (91.0) 0.18 2,705 (85.1) 337 (87.7) 1,126 (96.8) 242 (96.3) 44 (99.1) 84 (89.6)
    Immunosuppressive condition§§§ 505 (11.0) 132 (16.9) <0.01 240 (7.7) 45 (10.4) 215 (18.6) 50 (21.7) 18 (44.7) 26 (69.5)
    Reason for admission
    Likely COVID-19–related 4,487 (95.5) 712 (87.5) <0.01 3,046 (96.3) 356 (89.5) 1,069 (93.0) 215 (85.3) 42 (94.4) 79 (85.5)
    Inpatient surgery 33 (0.4) 12 (1.4) 14 (0.2) 4 (0.7) 17 (1.0) 5 (2.6) 0 (0.0) 2 (1.3)
    Psychiatric admission requiring medical care 75 (1.5) 32 (3.9) 50 (1.6) 14 (3.5) 18 (1.3) 12 (4.7) 0 (0.0) 3 (5.1)
    Trauma 69 (1.1) 23 (2.7) 37 (0.8) 13 (3.4) 27 (1.9) 5 (1.1) 1 (3.6) 2 (1.6)
    Other 68 (1.3) 28 (4.1) 29 (0.8) 7 (2.6) 31 (2.6) 15 (6.3) 2 (2.0) 4 (5.2)
    Unknown 13 (0.2) 3 (0.3) 7 (0.2) 2 (0.4) 6 (0.1) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 1 (1.2)
    COVID-19–related signs or symptoms on admission¶¶¶
    Yes 4,503 (95.7) 739 (91.9) <0.01 3,072 (97.0) 368 (93.6) 1,069 (92.9) 225 (90.3) 38 (89.5) 82 (90.6)
    No 244 (4.3) 73 (8.1) 113 (3.0) 29 (6.4) 98 (7.1) 27 (9.7) 7 (10.5) 9 (9.4)
    Hospitalization outcome
    Length of stay, days, median (IQR) 5 (3–10) 4 (2–9) <0.01 5 (3–11) 5 (3–9) 5 (3–10) 4 (2–9) 6 (3–18) 4 (2–10)
    ICU admission****,†††† 1,148 (24.2) 149 (16.8) <0.01 820 (25.3) 83 (17.4) 256 (22.7) 41 (16.1) 7 (21.1) 13 (16.8)
    IMV§§§§ 626 (13.6) 70 (7.6) <0.01 467 (14.9) 36 (6.6) 124 (11.2) 21 (8.2) 5 (16.7) 6 (9.2)
    In-hospital death¶¶¶¶ 540 (12.6) 72 (7.0) <0.01 385 (12.6) 42 (7.2) 123 (12.3) 19 (7.1) 5 (19.5) 7 (8.4)
    Vaccination status*****
    Unvaccinated 3,269 (69.5) 409 (49.4) <0.01 NA NA NA NA NA NA
    Primary series, no booster 1,183 (25.0) 255 (32.7) NA NA NA NA NA NA
    Primary series, plus booster 45 (1.3) 93 (13.4) NA NA NA NA NA NA
    Days since last vaccination dose received before positive SARS-CoV-2 test result†††††
    15–60 NA NA NA NA NA 19 (0.9) 3 (1.1) 22 (52.9) 23 (31.2)
    61–120 NA NA NA NA 88 (7.7) 14 (7.6) 11 (30.8) 45 (49.3)
    121–180 NA NA NA NA 336 (26.6) 20 (5.9) 2 (6.3) 12 (13.9)
    >180 NA NA NA NA 560 (64.9) 183 (85.4) 8 (10.0) 4 (5.5)

    Abbreviations: COVID-NET = COVID-19–Associated Hospitalization Surveillance Network; ICU = intensive care unit; IMV = invasive mechanical ventilation; LTCF = long-term care facility; NA = not applicable.
    * Data are from a weighted sample of hospitalized nonpregnant adults with completed medical record abstractions and a discharge disposition. Sample sizes presented are unweighted with weighted percentages.
    Vaccination status is based on state immunization information system data. Adults who completed a primary vaccination series were persons who had received the second dose of a 2-dose COVID-19 vaccination series or a single dose of a 1-dose product ≥14 days before a positive SARS-CoV-2 test associated with their hospitalization but received no booster or additional dose. Adults who received booster doses were classified as those who completed the primary series and received an additional or booster dose on or after August 13, 2021, at any time after completion of the primary series, and ≥14 days before a positive test result for SARS-CoV-2, as COVID-19–associated hospitalizations are a lagging indicator and time passed after receipt of a booster dose has been shown to be associated with reduced rates of COVID-19 infection (https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2114255external icon). Adults with a positive result whose SARS-CoV-2 test date was ≥14 days after the first dose of a 2-dose series but <14 days after receipt of the second dose were considered partially vaccinated. Partially vaccinated adults, and those who received a single dose of a 1-dose product <14 days before the positive SARS-CoV-2 test result were not included in analyses by vaccination status but were included in rates and overall proportions that were not stratified by vaccination status. Adults with no documented receipt of any COVID-19 vaccine dose before the test date were considered unvaccinated. If the SARS-CoV-2 test date was not available, hospital admission date was used. Adults whose vaccination status had not yet been verified using the immunization information system data were considered to have unknown vaccination status and were included in total proportions but not stratified by vaccination status. Vaccination status is not available for Iowa and cases from Iowa are excluded from analyses that examined vaccination status. Additional COVID-NET methods for determining vaccination status have been described previously. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.08.27.21262356v1external icon
    § Delta period: July 1, 2021–December 18, 2021, reflects the time when Delta was the predominant circulating variant; Omicron period: December 19, 2021–January 31, 2022, reflects the time when Omicron was the predominant circulating variant.
    Selected counties in California, Colorado, Connecticut, Georgia, Iowa, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, New Mexico, New York, Ohio, Oregon, Tennessee, and Utah (https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/69/wr/mm6915e3.htm). Iowa does not provide data on vaccination status. Starting the week ending December 4, 2021, Maryland data are not included in calculations but are included in previous weeks.
    ** Total hospitalizations include data from selected counties in 14 COVID-NET states irrespective of vaccination status and includes adults with partial or unknown vaccination status. As a result, the number of total hospitalizations exceeds the sum of unvaccinated adults, adults who received a primary series without a booster or additional dose, and adults who received a primary series with a booster or additional dose.
    †† Proportions between the pre-Delta and Delta period were compared using chi-square tests; p-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant, adjusted for multiple comparisons using the Bonferroni correction method.
    §§ Percentages presented for the overall number are weighted row percentages. Percentages presented for demographic characteristics are weighted column percentages.
    ¶¶ If ethnicity was unknown, non-Hispanic ethnicity was assumed. Persons with multiple, unknown, or missing race accounted for 6.9% (weighted) of all cases. These persons are excluded from the proportions of race/ethnicity but are included in other analyses.
    *** LTCF residents include hospitalized adults who were identified as residents of a nursing home/skilled nursing facility, rehabilitation facility, assisted living/residential care, long-term acute care hospital, group/retirement home, or other LTCF upon hospital admission. A free-text field for other types of residences was examined; patients with an LTCF-type residence were also categorized as LTCF residents.
    ††† Defined as one or more of the following: chronic lung disease including asthma, chronic metabolic disease including diabetes mellitus, blood disorder/hemoglobinopathy, cardiovascular disease, neurologic disorder, immunocompromising condition, renal disease, gastrointestinal/liver disease, rheumatologic/autoimmune/inflammatory condition, obesity, feeding tube dependency, and wheelchair dependency.
    §§§ Includes current treatment or recent diagnosis of an immunosuppressive condition or use of an immunosuppressive therapy during the preceding 12 months.
    ¶¶¶ COVID-19–associated signs and symptoms included respiratory symptoms (congestion or runny nose, cough, hemoptysis or bloody sputum, shortness of breath or respiratory distress, sore throat, upper respiratory infection, influenza-like illness, and wheezing) and non-respiratory symptoms (abdominal pain, altered mental status or confusion, anosmia or decreased smell, chest pain, conjunctivitis, diarrhea, dysgeusia or decreased taste, fatigue, fever or chills, headache, muscle aches or myalgias, nausea or vomiting, rash, and seizures). Symptoms are abstracted from the medical chart and might not be complete.
    **** ICU admission and IMV are not mutually exclusive categories, and patients could have received both.
    †††† ICU admission status was missing in 1.3% (weighted) of hospitalizations; these hospitalizations are included in other analyses.
    §§§§ IMV status was missing in 1.4% (weighted) of hospitalizations; these hospitalizations are otherwise included elsewhere in the analysis.
    ¶¶¶¶ In-hospital death status was missing in 1.4% (weighted) of hospitalizations; these hospitalizations are otherwise included elsewhere in the analysis.
    ***** An additional 172 (3.4%, 95% CI = 2.7%–4.2%) adults were partially vaccinated, 69 (0.9%, 95% CI = 0.6–1.2) received a primary vaccination series <14 days before a positive for SARS-CoV-2 test result, and 186 (4.1%) had unknown vaccination status; these groups are not further described in this analysis.
    ††††† If SARS-CoV-2 test date was missing, hospitalization admission date was used.

    Suggested citation for this article: Taylor CA, Whitaker M, Anglin O, et al. COVID-19–Associated Hospitalizations Among Adults During SARS-CoV-2 Delta and Omicron Variant Predominance, by Race/Ethnicity and Vaccination Status — COVID-NET, 14 States, July 2021–January 2022. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2022;71:466–473. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm7112e2external icon.


    MMWR and Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report are service marks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

    Use of trade names and commercial sources is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Department of
    Health and Human Services.
    References to non-CDC sites on the Internet are
    provided as a service to MMWR readers and do not constitute or imply
    endorsement of these organizations or their programs by CDC or the U.S.
    Department of Health and Human Services. CDC is not responsible for the content
    of pages found at these sites. URL addresses listed in MMWR were current as of
    the date of publication.

    All HTML versions of MMWR articles are generated from final proofs through an automated process.
    This conversion might result in character translation or format errors in the HTML version.
    Users are referred to the electronic PDF version (https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr)
    and/or the original MMWR paper copy for printable versions of official text, figures, and tables.

    Questions or messages regarding errors in formatting should be addressed to
    mmwrq@cdc.gov.

    German gas buyers raise the alarm over Russia’s rouble demand

    0
    • BDEW group calls on government to guard against disruption
    • Russian demand raises doubts over historic supply role
    • Russian gas still flowing west

    FRANKFURT/LONDON, March 24 (Reuters) – German utilities on Thursday said their country needed an early warning system to tackle gas shortages, a day after Russia ordered the switch of contract payments to roubles, raising the risk of a supply squeeze and even higher prices.

    President Vladimir Putin’s rouble payment demand, which IEA Executive Director Fatih Birol called a “security threat,” added to market nervousness and called into question Russia’s historic claim it is a reliable gas supplier regardless of geopolitics.

    Putin announced this demand on Wednesday, in the wake of the United States and European allies teaming up on a series of sanctions aimed at Russia after that nation’s invasion Ukraine last month. read more

    Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

    Europe’s energy sector is already witnessing supply concerns and the benchmark price for German gas delivery next year is up 8% since Putin’s remarks, after already quadrupling over the last 12 months.

    For more than 50 years, even during the Cold War, Moscow has ensured supply to Germany, the biggest consumer of Russian gas. Russia’s main gas exporter, Gazprom (GAZP.MM), has more than 40 long-term agreements with European counterparties. read more

    But on Thursday, Germany’s utilities association BDEW, which counts Gazprom customers RWE (RWEG.DE) and EnBW’s (EBKG.DE) VNG (VNG.UL) as members, urged the government to devise an early warning system in case Russia stops supplies.

    “There are concrete and serious indications that the gas supply situation is about to deteriorate,” BDEW President Kerstin Andreae said, citing Russian’s demand for “unfriendly” countries, which include Germany, to pay for gas in roubles. read more

    BDEW said the national energy regulator, the Bundesnetzagentur, needs to set criteria by which industries and sectors would continue to receive supply, while household customers are protected under existing regulations.

    German economy minister Robert Habeck said there was no need for an early warning mechanism and that supply was guaranteed, but added the situation needed to be monitored closely.

    DILEMMA

    Russia’s demand, which still needs to be backed by a concrete mechanism, presents European customers with a dilemma: decline to pay in roubles and risk getting no gas, or comply and risk higher prices as contracts get renegotiated and more favourable long-term deals are jettisoned.

    “Russia is not (yet) turning off the gas tap. But it could significantly increase the price we pay for it,” analysts at Commerzbank said.

    A compressor station of RWE is pictured in the western town of Huenxe January 7, 2009. REUTERS/Ina Fassbender/File Photo

    Asked whether the United States would allow European nations that cannot manage without Russian gas to process payment in roubles without finding themselves in a breach of sanctions, a White House official said Washington was consulting with its allies.

    European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen agreed, and said the move was an attempt to circumvent EU sanctions against Russia. “We will not allow our sanctions to be circumvented. The time when energy could be used to blackmail us is over,” she said. read more

    Japan, the biggest importer of Russian LNG in Asia, said it was unclear how the rouble switch would work. read more

    Tokyo Gas (9531.T) and Osaka Gas (9532.T), the country’s two biggest local gas suppliers, said they were studying details on the rouble requirement, echoing remarks from Germany’s VNG and other European buyers of Russian pipeline gas.

    South Korea, Asia’s third-largest importer of Russian LNG, expects to be able to continue imports, with the country’s Financial Services Commission saying it would do whatever was necessary to facilitate trade.

    Russian gas supply concerns underpin Asia’s spot LNG prices and Europe’s gas price benchmark

    In Poland, Pawel Majewski, CEO of PGNiG (PGN.WA), said the company – which has a contract with Gazprom until the end of this year – could not simply switch to paying in roubles.

    “Our contract partner can’t freely change the payment method stipulated in the contract,” he said.

    Denmark’s energy giant, Orsted (ORSTED.CO), which also has a long-term take-or-pay contract with Gazprom, said the likely impact of the move was unclear.

    RWE and Uniper (UN01.DE), Germany’s biggest Gazprom client, had no immediate comment on Thursday, while Spain’s Naturgy, which has a contract with Yamal LNG, also declined to comment.

    A top Italian economic adviser said on Wednesday the country would continue to pay in euros.

    For now, Russian gas continues to flow.

    Gas deliveries westwards to Europe through the Nord Stream 1 pipeline across the Baltic Sea rose slightly on Thursday, while the Yamal-Europe pipeline flowed east from Germany into Poland.

    Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

    Reporting by Vera Eckert and Christoph Steitz in Frankfurt; Stine Jacobsen in Copenhagen; Marwa Rashad, Nina Chestney and Noah Browning in London; Marek Strzelecki in Warsaw; Valentina Za in Milan; Tom Kaeckenhoff in Duesseldorf; Yuka Obayashi, Kantaro Komiya and Ritsuko Shimizu in Tokyo; Heekyong Yang and Joori Roh in Seoul; Jeanny Kao in Taipei; Isla Binnie in Madrid; Arathy Somasekhar in Houston; Trevor Hunnicutt in Washington
    Editing by Barbara Lewis and Matthew Lewis

    Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

    Creepy AF Elden Ring Invasion Will Have You Screaming Nope

    0

    An image from YouTuber yung maestro depicting their Tarnished about to get rekt in online Elden Ring PvP by a duo named Fin and Ger.

    Elden Ring can be pretty horrifying. Sometimes it’s the monsters, eldritch horrors with way too many appendages and exposed arteries. Other times it’s the environment, shrouded in misty white fog and just a few obelisk structures as haunting music hums in the background. Such is the case with this nightmarish invasion YouTuber yung maestro experienced in the Consecrated Snowfield of FromSoftware’s latest game. Y’all, I’m spooked.

    Elden Ring’s multiplayer allows you to do things like summon buddies who can help you finally take down that boss that kept kicking your ass. At the same time, though, hostile summoning signs shown by either using the Duelist’s Furled Finger or Festering Bloody Finger, leave you susceptible to PvP invasions from aggressive fans looking to kill you by any means necessary, whether that’s tucking into a ball or blowing themselves up.

    However, what happened to a player who goes by yung maestro was far more frightening. Maestro tweeted a video of themselves getting absolutely fingered to death by twin cooperative players, aptly named Fin and Ger. No, I’m not joking.

    It took place in the Consecrated Snowfield, a secret location in the northeast area of the Lands Between, not far from the Mountaintops of the Giants. It’s this rocky terrain covered in snow and fog. You know, the kinda place where horrors occur. Maestro spawned in, intent on defeating Fin, Host of Fingers, and rushed to engage in combat. Fin, performing what seems to be the Rapture gesture with their arms outstretched toward the sky as if praying to some divine deity for strength, pulled out their Ringed Finger hammer and started running toward maestro. Jumping off the rocks Fin was standing on, maestro then ran into Ger. Sadly, it was over way before it even started.

    Maestro panicked as Fin and Ger, wearing the same bulbous Envoy Crown helmet and what appeared to be the freakish Godskin Noble Robe chest piece, closed in. The result was a deadly fingering. The duo used the Ringed Finger’s claw flick weapon skill, which curls the weapon up and releases it with great ferocity, almost simultaneously. Maestro got knocked down, tried scrambling away to heal, and even unleashed a powerful dragon incantation called Placidusax’s Ruin that shoots fire out of their dragon-transformed head. But it was futile. Maestro died as The Ancient Dragon, an ominous Dark Souls track, played in the background. It’s not the Consecrated Snowfield’s real music, but the horrifying effect was still expertly achieved.

    Maestro ghastly foible was a snippet from a YouTube video they posted on March 23, which was a compilation of PvP fights. The fingering death was so disheartening, it led maestro to madness, apparently pumping their Faith stat to 99 and repeatedly using the Placidusax’s Ruin on all invaders.

    Maestro told Kotaku over direct messages that the deadly invasion was too hilariously haunting to not edit the eerie music in for comedic effect.

    “Surprisingly it’s not scripted,” maestro said. “I’ve found that in the Souls games, people often set up with a friend like that to surprise invaders. When it happens, it’s more fun to play along and see where it goes than to just fight.”

    Though unscripted, things happen at very precise moments, like the fetal position gesture the duo perform just as maestro’s body evaporates from their plane of existence. Whatever the case, this dreadful video will haunt me as I continue making my way through the Lands Between. I already explore the desolate world on edge. Invasions like this one only exacerbate my fears.

     

    Teresa Giudice hospitalized for ’emergency medical procedure’

    0

    Teresa Giudice was admitted to the hospital Wednesday night and underwent an “emergency medical procedure,” Page Six can exclusively confirm.

    “She is in recovery, currently resting, and she thanks everyone for their prayers and well-wishes,” Giudice’s rep tells us, noting that Thursday morning’s surgery was “non-cosmetic.”

    She is set to be released from the hospital “within the next 24 hours,” the rep says.

    Eldest daughter Gia Giudice revealed on her Instagram Story Thursday afternoon that the “Real Housewives of New Jersey” star, 49, had been in the emergency room.

    “Such a trooper. I love you,” the 21-year-old wrote over a selfie of her mom wearing a face mask while in a hospital bed.

    “Pray for a speedy recovery,” Gia then asked her followers alongside a prayer-hands emoji before reiterating, “I love you @teresagiudice.”

    Teresa Giudice at the hospital.
    Gia Giudice posted this selfie of Teresa Giudice in a hospital bed, breaking the news that her mom had been admitted.
    _giagiudice/Instagram

    Teresa’s other family members, including brother Joe Gorga, sister-in-law Melissa Gorga, fiancé Luis Ruelas and her three younger daughters, Gabriella, 17, Milania, 16, and Audriana, 12, have not commented on the hospitalization on social media.

    The reality star’s most recent Instagram post was shared Tuesday and was a shout-out to her co-stars from Season 1 of “Real Housewives Ultimate Girls Trip,” which premiered on Peacock and is airing on Bravo.

    She captioned the picture of the cast on a boat, “I can’t believe The Ultimate Girls Trip is coming to an end tonight! I had such a blast on this trip Hope you guys all enjoyed it!”

    Teresa had not recently complained to the public about any health issues and leads a pretty healthy lifestyle that has included yoga workouts and weightlifting.

    In 2018, she placed third in her first-ever bodybuilding competition.

    She told Us Weekly at the time, “This is the most confident I’ve felt after my kids. This is the best I’ve ever felt since having Gia.”

    Teresa Giudice posing with daughters Gia, Milania, Gabriella and Audriana at an event.
    Teresa has four daughters from her marriage to ex-husband Joe Giudice.
    Getty Images

    The mother of four added, “My body drastically changed because of yoga, but this was even more extreme. It debunks the myth that if you’re over 40, you can’t look good.”

    In February, Teresa shared on Instagram that she had a minor procedure done to help reduce the appearance of varicose veins but noted at the time, “My legs look and feel great.”

    The Bravolebrity’s most recent in-person appearance was on “Watch What Happens Live” last week, in which she revealed Melissa, 43, would not be one of the bridesmaids at her summer wedding to Ruelas.

    Teresa was married to Joe Giudice from 1999 to 2020.

    SpaceX’s new Dragon capsule named ‘Freedom’

    0

    NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

    SpaceX’s Crew-4 will launch to the International Space Station (ISS) in April aboard a Dragon capsule named “Freedom.” 

    NASA astronaut Kjell Lindgren announced the name on Twitter on Wednesday. 

    NASA ANNOUNCES PLANS TO DEVELOP SECOND ARTEMIS MOON LANDER

    “FREEDOM!! Crew-4 will fly to the International Space Station in a new Dragon capsule named ‘Freedom,'” he wrote. “The name celebrates a fundamental human right, and the industry and innovation that emanate from the unencumbered human spirit.”

    Lindgren continued to say that SpaceX and NASA have “restored a national capability” and that Crew-4 honors the ingenuity and hard work of those involved in the effort. 

    “Alan Shepard flew on Freedom 7 at the dawn of human spaceflight. We are honored to bring Freedom to a new generation!” he said. 

    The Freedom 7 mission took place in May 1961. Shepard, one of the original Mercury 7 astronauts, piloted the first U.S. human spaceflight.

    Lindgren, the Crew-4 mission commander, is joined by NASA pilot Bob Hines and mission specialist Jessica Watkins, as well as European Space Agency mission specialist Samantha Cristoforetti.

    RUSSIA’S MINISTRY OF DEFENSE HEAD SERGEI SHOIGU REPORTEDLY MISSING, HASN’T MADE PUBLIC APPEARANCES IN 12 DAYS

    NASA said the earliest targeted launch date for the mission is April 19, 2022. 

    According to an agency blog post, the date was adjusted “allow appropriate spacing for operations and post-flight data reviews between human spaceflight missions and to allow for multiple consecutive launch attempts based on the orbital mechanics for arrival to the space station.”

    “The current no earlier than launch date is Tuesday, April 19, pending completion of program reviews expected early next week to formalize the new target. Crew-4 will carry an international crew of four astronauts to the orbital complex on a new Dragon spacecraft and flight proven Falcon 9 rocket for a science expedition mission,” it said.

    Freedom will lift off in a Falcon 9 rocket from NASA’s Florida-based Kennedy Space Center. 

    CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

    The other Crew Dragon capsules are named Endeavour, Resilience and Endurance. 

    CPS investigations in Rio Grande Valley chill political discourse regarding gender-affirming care

    0

    Sara Parsons is a retired speech therapist based in the Rio Grande Valley who helped launch a local support group for parents of trans children after her daughter came out as trans six years ago.

    “I have friends that have already been reported,” Parsons said from Harlingen, her Cameron County hometown on the border.

    The reports Parsons referred to are Child Protective Services (CPS) investigations into the parents and families of trans children.

    In February, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton issued a non-binding legal opinion that argued that gender-affirming health care treatments for children constituted child abuse. Later that month, Gov. Greg Abbott directed the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services (DFPS), under which CPS operates, to begin investigating any reports of these types of treatments.

    A Texas appeals court reinstated an injunction early this week to pause the investigations with the intention of making a decision in July. However, Paxton brought an appeal to the Texas Supreme Court just two days later.

    The ongoing litigation has left an unclear course of action for state employees and legal questions for parents.

    On the Texas-Mexico border, Parsons said she began to hear about local CPS investigations through her support group network.

    “I have friends here in the Valley that have already been notified by CPS, but with caution,” explained Parsons. “CPS has investigated and gone to the school. The school has said, ‘We have wonderful parents here.’ You know, everything is good. But the gist of the whole matter is that they were still investigated and they’re still under investigation.”

    Pablo De La Rosa

    /

    Texas Public Radio

    Sara Parsons, a retired speech therapist based in the Rio Grande Valley, launched a local support group for parents of trans children after her daughter came out as trans six years ago.

    When TPR contacted Region 11 DFPS media specialist John Lennan for comment, he said the agency “could not comment on individual investigations as litigation continues.”

    Parsons says that after cases began to spring up in the region, some members of the parent support group she helps lead became more careful about their online presence and have avoided speaking to the media.

    “A lot of people in our group now are just way too afraid, intimidated, to go out to show their faces. One of my friends said, ‘I just can’t do it. I’m afraid because they haven’t come after me, but I know I’m targeted. And I can’t do it. I can’t put my name. I can’t put my face out there.’”

    Parsons explained that she agreed to speak to TPR only because her daughter came out as trans after her 18th birthday.

    With legal cases ongoing, the extended family and legal counsel of members of Parsons’ support group also expressed concern about the unknown consequences of being identified and possibly reported.

    “They’ve been advised by family members and by their attorneys, ‘Don’t give interviews. Don’t have your picture taken. They’re coming for you.’”

    Madeleine Croll has previously served on the executive board of the Hidalgo County Democratic Party and is currently president of the Rio Grande Valley-based advocacy organization Gender Equality Network of Texas, or GENTex.

    She said that Abbott’s directive and the resulting CPS investigations locally had a chilling effect on civic participation in the region. Families are so concerned that some have opted out of participating in political public events over the past few weeks.

    “We have some very active parents of trans kids,” Croll told TPR during a trans rights political action that she organized last week at Edinburg City Hall.

    “Unfortunately, under the current directive, they don’t feel as comfortable bringing out their kids,” she explained. “Now, Greg Abbott has declared open season, and is telling people to file CPS complaints against them for loving their kids and respecting their kids for who they really are.”

    Trans rights advocates gather at Edinburg City Hall in The Rio Grande Valley in March to protest Gov. Abbott’s directive to investigate gender-affirming care as child abuse.

    Pablo De La Rosa

    /

    Texas Public Radio

    Trans rights advocates gather at Edinburg City Hall in The Rio Grande Valley in March to protest Gov. Abbott’s directive to investigate gender-affirming care as child abuse.

    Other states with Republican-controlled legislatures have recently mimicked Abbott’s actions on proposed legislation targeting trans individuals.

    The LGBTQ+ advocacy group Human Rights Campaign (HRC) tracked 38 proposed bills in the U.S. introduced this year alone that seek to deny gender-affirming care to trans children.

    Some Republicans have openly signaled these bills as good politics for the GOP, such as Abbott political strategist Dave Carney, who told reporters, “This is a winning issue. Texans have common sense. This is why the Democrats across the country are out of touch.”

    Madeleine Croll has served on the executive board of the Hidalgo Democratic Party and is president of the trans advocacy nonprofit Gender Equality Network of Texas (GENTex) in the Rio Grande Valley.

    Pablo De La Rosa

    /

    Texas Public Radio

    Madeleine Croll has served on the executive board of the Hidalgo Democratic Party and is president of the trans advocacy nonprofit Gender Equality Network of Texas (GENTex) in the Rio Grande Valley.

    Elias Cantu is the president of LULAC Rio Grande Valley Rainbow Council and serves on the national LULAC LGBT Task Force.

    He said he’s spoken with several advocacy organizations in the region about the ramifications of Abbott’s directive. While the cases have sparked fear, activist leaders in the Rio Grande Valley said they are cautious but unsurprised at Abbott’s actions.

    “We did meet virtually in several meetings. I am a part of several other organizations. Basically what we’re hearing is the same,” said Cantu. “This is all during election season. This is all for votes. And at what cost? It could cost someone. You know, a trans child–a trans child’s life.”

    While Cantu and other leaders see a predictable and detached play for votes from Republicans, Parsons believed the intention behind recent directives targeting trans people may be more personal.

    She explained that her negative experiences with those outside the trans community and the recent anonymously initiated CPS reports by persons presumably close to the families now under investigation led her to look deeper.

    “I would love to say that it’s all political. But I don’t think that was first and foremost in (Abbott’s) mind,” Parsons said. “The previous presidential administration gave everyone permission to not only speak their mind, but dig deep down into themselves. They now have the freedom to say it out loud.”

    RELATED | A third of trans youth are at risk of losing gender-affirming care, study says

    Parsons said the governor’s directive has caused not just a chilling effect on public participation in politics, but an uneasiness in the private life of the community as well.

    “They’ve all said the same thing,” said Parsons about recent sentiments shared within her parent network. “‘We don’t know who turned us in.’ And those are the words – ’turned us in’. Basically they’ve been criminalized.”

    “We don’t know if the school called CPS, we don’t know if it was our physician’s office. And so you’re talking about the people that you entrust with your child’s life. I had a friend who said, ‘I can’t accept this. My God doesn’t make mistakes.’”

    “So I think it’s way beyond political. It’s just become a one track mind to eliminate the odd, the different. The fact that they think that my child and people like her don’t belong.”

    RELATED | His public custody battle helped ignite a movement against transgender health care for kids. Will it carry him to the Texas House?

    Croll said that the recent injunction on investigations gave her some cautious hope moving forward, but she warned that the outcome of rulings on these cases concern more than just trans advocacy organizations.

    “The actions of the governor and attorney general are far beyond the scope of their power of office,” she said. “It’s good that the courts saw they were without merit.”

    She added: “But this is a dangerous action. We want people to be aware of the fact that actions taken in removing the liberty and rights of transgender people can easily be turned upon other groups.”

    Uber Partners With Yellow Taxi Companies in N.Y.C.

    0

    New Yorkers ordering a ride on the Uber app will soon be able to choose a yellow taxi under a new partnership between the ride-hailing giant and two taxi technology companies.

    Starting later this spring for anyone in New York City, the deal will enable Uber riders to pay roughly the same price for a yellow taxi as they would for a standard individual Uber ride, known as UberX, the company said.

    They will get a price upfront in the app before they request the trip, as they currently do with all Uber rides.

    Yellow cabdrivers who respond to Uber app hails will also see a ride’s pricing upfront and under the deal will have the option to accept or reject it.

    The Uber-taxi partnership is the first such large-scale deal in the United States. and comes as New York City’s embattled yellow taxi industry has been decimated by the coronavirus pandemic, with many people still working from home and many tourists staying away.

    The partnership is also something of an about-face for Uber, which has clashed with taxi groups for years as it has attempted to take over markets around the world. But Uber has discovered more recently that partnering with taxi companies instead of fighting them can turbocharge its business, especially overseas. Partnerships with taxi fleets and technology companies in other countries allow Uber riders to order taxis on the app, as will be the case in New York.

    Those agreements, combined with the New York partnership, “would seem to reflect a new page or a new stance in Uber being willing to work more closely with the industry that it was once trying to disrupt,” said Tom White, a senior research analyst with the financial firm D.A. Davidson.

    Being “a little more friendly” with taxi companies could help Uber “curry favor and smooth Uber’s relationships with legislators and policymakers” in those cities, he added.

    Uber said it had integrated with more than 2,500 taxis in Spain, partnered with the taxi service TaxExpress in Colombia, acquired the local HK Taxi app in Hong Kong last year, begun a partnership with SK Telecom in South Korea and also worked with taxis in other countries, including Germany, Austria and Turkey.

    Uber’s new partnership with the taxi industry in New York, which was reported earlier by The Wall Street Journal, will generate more revenue for the company since it receives a fee on every ride ordered through its app.

    Before the pandemic, taxi drivers in New York were losing fares to Uber’s and Lyft’s ride-app services and facing financial ruin after taking out loans to buy medallions — city-issued permits required to own a yellow cab — at inflated prices.

    Uber has faced its own challenges during the pandemic. Early on, with demand for rides plummeting and drivers worried about contracting the coronavirus, many left the platform.

    As the U.S. economy rebounded and cities relaxed restrictions, customers flocked back to Uber and Lyft apps but found that drivers had not returned in the same numbers, leading to drastically higher fares and long wait times for trips.

    Both companies last year acknowledged that they were struggling to attract enough drivers to keep up with demand, and they offered incentives like cash bonuses to get drivers back. The companies say the problem is easing, and Uber said the number of drivers on its platform was at its highest level since February 2020.

    Gridwise, an app that helps drivers track their earnings and tallies data, has found that driver earnings on ride-hail apps have also risen in recent months.

    Still, many drivers remain unhappy about how much money they make, and some said they were driving less or not at all since high gas prices began eating into their earnings.

    Antonio Cruz, 50, a Brooklyn resident who drives for Uber two days a week, said he was concerned that the new Uber-taxi partnership could mean more competition from yellow cabs, especially on the days when he works in Manhattan. “We could lose business,” he said.

    Bruce Schaller, a former city transportation official, said the short-term benefit of the deal was to provide Uber with access to more drivers.

    “If they’re saying they’re fine with drivers now, fine, I just don’t buy it,” Mr. Schaller added. “With the pandemic plus gas prices, more drivers is always good. Even if they have ‘enough,’ having a bigger base of drivers out there is good for Uber.”

    At Uber’s investor day in February, Andrew Macdonald, Uber’s senior vice president of mobility and business operations, said the company wanted every taxi in the world on its platform by 2025 and that it had already added 122,000 taxis to the app last year.

    .

    Uber’s deal with taxi companies in New York could also put pressure on its rival, Lyft, to respond.

    “I would expect Lyft to make a similar deal — in fact I expect them to make the exact same deal,” Mr. Schaller said. Lyft did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

    The new Uber-taxi partnership in New York did not require the approval of the city’s Taxi and Limousine Commission, which oversees the taxi industry, city officials said, though the agency will still have oversight of the rules covering all for-hire drivers.

    “We are always interested in innovative tools that can expand economic opportunities for taxi drivers,” said the agency’s acting commissioner, Ryan Wanttaja. “We are excited about any proposal to more easily connect passengers with taxis and look forward to learning more about this agreement between Uber and the taxi apps and ensuring it complies with TLC rules.”

    New Yorkers can still wave down yellow taxis in the street or order them through two taxi apps, Curb and Arro, which offer upfront pricing like with Uber rides.

    The city’s 13,587 yellow taxis are equipped with technology systems from Curb or Creative Mobile Technologies, which operates the Arro app. The systems also provide driver and passenger information monitors in each vehicle, take credit card payments from riders and pay drivers.

    When a rider requests a yellow taxi through the Uber app, the trip will be referred to Curb or CMT, which will use Uber’s pricing and payment structures. Both Uber and the taxi company will receive fees from the rides. Taxi drivers will continue to be paid through the Curb and CMT systems.

    It is hard to say how the deal will affect passengers and drivers, in part because trip costs and driver payments are controlled by algorithms that vary depending on the app, the length and distance of a trip, the time of day riders request cars and other factors.

    In some cases, riders may pay more for a taxi that they order through the Uber app than for a taxi they hail on the street, but that may not always be true. Similarly, drivers may receive more for a metered trip than a trip ordered through the Uber app, but that may not always be true, either. Uber said it would be providing more details about the taxi option in the coming months.

    Bhairavi Desai, the head of the Taxi Workers Alliance, a group that represents cabdrivers, said she believed that drivers accepting trips from the Uber app would earn less than if they picked someone up off the street and took them to the same place.

    She urged drivers to negotiate better fares from Uber, noting that the agreement was struck “at a moment when the companies need this deal more than the drivers do” because Uber is “hemorrhaging drivers.”

    “We’re going to seize it as an opportunity to negotiate proper terms for the drivers,” she said.

    Others expressed more optimism.

    Mr. Schaller said that if the new system was implemented properly, following existing regulations, it should benefit both drivers and customers.

    “I’ve always expected there would eventually be a convergence of yellow cabs and ride-hail apps, but I wouldn’t have predicted 2022 if you asked me in 2019,” Mr. Schaller added.

    Signs of ovarian cancer you must never ignore

    0

    Health issues always present themselves with tell-tale signs and warnings. In the case of ovarian cancer, for instance, there are some “subtle signs and symptoms“, says Dr Niti Raizada, director, medical oncology and hemato oncology, Fortis Hospital, Richmond Road, Bangalore.

    She explains that ovarian cancer begins in the female organs which produce eggs known as the ovaries. This form of cancer is the third common among women in India, with 46,000 new cases each year. “Family history of cancer forms an important part of evaluation,” she says.

    According to the doctor, presentation of ovarian cancer includes:

    – Often asymptomatic
    – Abdominal bloating
    – Change in bowel habits, indigestion, or nausea
    – Fluid in abdomen known as ascites
    – Weight loss and generalised fatigue
    – Pelvic discomfort
    – Backache
    – Increased frequency of urination
    – Irregular menstruation, difficulty eating, and urinary issues are just a few signs of the later stages of ovarian cancer, when it has spread to the pelvis and the abdomen.

    “Unfortunately, there are no symptoms in the early stages. When the cancer is contained to the ovaries, it is the easiest to treat. Any woman who has ovaries is at risk of ovarian cancer, although there are some factors that increase this risk,” Dr Raizada explains.

    How to reduce the risk of ovarian cancer

    The doctor suggests the following tips:

    1. Diet and exercise

    Weekly exercise regime and a healthy diet are important. Plenty of fruits, vegetables and food rich in vitamin D are some of the dietary measures. Working out 30-40 minutes every day can reduce the risk by up to 20 per cent. Have an active lifestyle.

    2. Oral contraceptives

    Oral contraceptive intake among women is studied to have up to a 50 per cent lower risk of developing ovarian cancer, but one requires medical consultation prior. Length of intake also has some association.

    Ovarian cancer begins in the female organs which produce eggs known as the ovaries. (Photo: Getty/Thinkstock)

    3. Avoiding carcinogens

    Carcinogens are substances that are capable of causing cancer. Substances such as talcum powder (baby powder, vaginal deodorants and makeup) are known to have some uncertain association.

    4. Pregnancy and breastfeeding

    Women who have birthed at least one child, especially before the age of 30, have a lower risk of developing ovarian cancer and even breast cancer. Breastfeeding is also known to lower the risk.

    5. Healthy lifestyle

    Avoiding the use and exposure of tobacco products can not only lower your risk of ovarian cancer, but many other types of cancers as well. Along with it, limiting your alcohol consumption is best.

    6. Genetic Link

    Some ovarian cancers are linked to genetic changes and run-in families with several cases of breast and ovarian cancer. One such important mutation is called BRCA1 (breast cancer gene 1) and BRCA2 (breast cancer gene 2). Identifying such families and their genetic risks will help implement risk-reduction strategies.

    It is important to identify high-risk groups which can be subjected to screening for ovarian cancer. These screening methods include a trans-vaginal ultrasound and serum Ca125 (blood test). Screening tools are generally non-invasive.

    📣 For more lifestyle news, follow us on Instagram | Twitter | Facebook and don’t miss out on the latest updates!

    A Texas Grand Jury Is Considering Another Charge Against Deshaun Watson

    0

    A grand jury in Brazoria County in Texas is considering evidence related to a 10th accusation of sexual misconduct against Deshaun Watson, the former Houston Texans quarterback who was traded to the Cleveland Browns just days ago, according to a lawyer for the complainant.

    A grand jury in Harris County, Texas, where Houston is, rejected nine criminal cases against Watson earlier this month. But a 10th criminal complaint filed with the Houston Police Department described an alleged incident outside the jurisdiction of the Harris County District Attorney’s Office.

    The case, in Brazoria County, south of Houston, is the last criminal case pending against Watson. The complainant told police that Watson ejaculated on her in a November 2020 massage appointment. Her lawyer, Tony Buzbee, said he expects the grand jury to deliberate and issue a decision on Thursday or Friday. Neither the Browns nor Rusty Hardin, Watson’s lawyer, were immediately available for comment.

    The latest grand jury proceeding was first reported by Fox 8 WJW in Cleveland.

    The publicly available police report was heavily redacted but said that the complainant told police that Watson “touched her with his penis and ejaculated causing semen to touch her arm and hand.”

    The complainant, whose name was redacted in the criminal complaint, is one of the 22 plaintiffs who are suing Watson in civil court for sexual misconduct during massage appointments.

    Watson has denied all wrongdoing, and Hardin has said that any sexual acts that occurred during massage appointments were consensual.

    After the grand jury in Harris County declined to bring charges on March 11, Hardin said in a statement that “the criminal investigations have been completed.” N.F.L. teams viewed the decision in Harris County as a green light to pursue Watson via trade, and the Browns gave Watson a guaranteed five-year, $230 million contract, a record for a guaranteed deal. They structured the deal to mitigate Watson’s financial penalty if the N.F.L. suspends him for a violation of its personal-conduct policy by setting his 2022 base salary at just over $1 million, minimizing each potential missed game check.

    The Browns said in a statement on Sunday that they undertook a “comprehensive evaluation process” before trading for Watson and did “extensive” investigative, legal and reference work. The statement acknowledged that “some legal proceedings” were still ongoing, but it was unclear whether the Browns were aware that a case would be brought before the Brazoria County grand jury this week.

    The N.F.L.’s investigation into the allegations against Watson is ongoing. A person who identified himself as a security representative for the N.F.L. requested information from the Houston Police Department on March 15, including witness statements and phone records or social-media messages, and also asked for interviews with the police investigators who worked the case, according to police records.

    Watson invoked his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination in civil depositions given before the decision by the Harris County grand jury, but waived that right and answered questions under oath in depositions last week and this week, Buzbee said.

    Before the deal with the Browns, Watson also met with the Atlanta Falcons, Carolina Panthers and New Orleans Saints last week.

    Kevin Draper contributed reporting.

    Man stuck in Costa Rica after flesh-eating bug infected genitals

    0

    A British man developed a flesh-eating disease that infected his genitals after undergoing a minor medical procedure during a recent business trip to Costa Rica, according to a report.

    Colin Graw, 47, who traveled to the Central American country to pursue a business opportunity, underwent the operation and was discharged the same day, but soon developed intense pain, LancsLive reported.

    Four days later, doctors told him he was suffering from necrotising fasciitis, a rare but serious flesh-eating bacterial infection that affects the tissue under the skin and surrounding muscles and organs.

    Making matters worse, he contracted Fournier’s gangrene, a form of necrotizing fasciitis that affects the scrotum, penis or perineum, according to the outlet.

    Graw underwent grueling surgeries to remove the infected tissues and was left with multiple wounds and intense pain.

    He has been put on antibiotics to fight off the flesh-eating disease but is susceptible to more infections and goes to the hospital three times a week to prevent them, according to LancsLive.

    Colin Graw underwent the operation and was discharged the same day, but soon developed intense pain
    Family handout

    “It’s been absolutely horrific for him, he is in exceptional amounts of pain, he can’t sit properly — he only had a 30 percent chance of survival because it’s such a rare bacterial infection and there aren’t many antibiotics that can treat these types of infections,” his sister Tanja Wilis, 49, told the outlet.

    “He is in Costa Rica, he’s in the public hospital there, he’s got no family, he’s got his girlfriend but he was weeks in hospital where very few people spoke English, absolutely no visitors allowed, no family around dealing with what was a near-death experience fighting for his life for week. It’s just been awful,” the resident of Parbold in the UK added.

    In late January, Willis flew to Costa Rica to be at Graw’s side but was only allowed a brief opportunity to hold her brother’s hand.

    Graw pictured in the hospital in Costa Rica
    Colin Graw has been put on antibiotics to fight off the flesh-eating disease.
    Family handout

    “They’re still trying to fight off infections that are highly resistant to antibiotics. He is too ill to travel so we’re not in a position to get him home,” she told LancsLive.

    “Since the visit, I’ve been in contact with Katya, his partner who he is now at home with, and we communicate via Whatsapp and social media so that I can get regular updates on his progress and treatments,” Willis said.

    “I think he was exceptionally unlucky to contract bacteria like that. He was on the beach one day, and three days later he was in hospital fighting for his life, it happened so quickly,” she said.

    Colin Graw GoFundMe page
    The GoFundMe has raised about $14,000 of its goal of $210,000 as of Thursday.

    “It was just supposed to be a day procedure. He just got an infection and it literally escalated from something minor to him being lying on his death bed,” the sister added.

    The medical costs have so far amounted to about $105,000 but with the additional treatment required, it has been estimated the total will be as high as about $200,000, according to a GoFundMe account she has set up.

    As of Thursday, it has raised about $14,000 of its goal of $210,000.